$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

채식주의자 식품소비가치에 따른 채식기반식품과 채식식당에 대한 인식
Awareness of Vegetarian-based Food (aquafaba) and Vegetarian Restaurant according to the Food Consumption Value of Vegetarians 원문보기

韓國食生活文化學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture, v.36 no.5, 2021년, pp.430 - 440  

김하영 (상명대학교 식품영양학과) ,  최승균 (상명대학교 식품영양학과) ,  강상진 ((주)에이라이프) ,  신원선 (한양대학교 식품영양학과) ,  심윤영 (사스카츄완 대학교 식물과학과) ,  뤠니 제이 티 마틴 (사스카츄완 대학교 식물과학과) ,  김지혜 (성균관대학교 융합생명공학과) ,  조재열 (성균관대학교 융합생명공학과) ,  홍완수 (상명대학교 식품영양학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study was to provide basic data for future research and suggest product development and market segmentation strategies by identifying the perceptions and consumption behaviors of vegetarians in each segment of the vegetarian market. According to food consumption value, a total of...

주제어

표/그림 (7)

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Beacom E, Repar L, Bogue J. 2021. Market-oriented Development of Plant-based Food and Beverage Products: A Usage Segmentation Approach. J. Food Prod. Mark., pp 1-19 

  2. Birchal, Rhaima Aparecida Mendonca da Costa, Moura LRC, Vasconcelos FCW, Cunha, Nina Rosa da Silveira. 2018. The Value Perceived and the Sacrifice Perceived by Vegetarian Food Consumers. Revista Pensamento Contemporaneo em Administracao, 12(1):1 

  3. Choi MH, Shin HJ. 2019. State-of-the-Art of Cultured Meat Research and Engineering Task. KSBB. J., 34(3):127-134. 

  4. Clark LF, Bogdan A. 2019. Plant-Based Foods in Canada: Information, Trust and Closing the Commercialization Gap. Br. Food J., 121(10):2535 

  5. Contini C, Boncinelli F, Marone E, Scozzafava G, Casini L. 2020. Drivers of Plant-Based Convenience Foods Consumption: Results of a Multicomponent Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Food Qual. Prefer., 84:103931 

  6. Corepal, RK, Copeman, J. 2014. The Perceived Barriers and Benefits of Consuming A Plant-Based Diet. Eur. J. Nutr. Food Saf., pp 252-253 

  7. Corrin T, Papadopoulos A. 2017. Understanding the Attitudes and Perceptions of Vegetarian and Plant-Based Diets to Shape Future Health Promotion Programs. Appetite, 109:40-47 

  8. Earle M, Hodson G. 2017. What's Your Beef with Vegetarians? Predicting Anti-Vegetarian Prejudice from Pro-Beef Attitudes Across Cultures. Pers. Individ. Differ., 119:52-55 

  9. Feher A, Gazdecki M, Veha M, Szakaly M, Szakaly Z. 2020. A Comprehensive Review of the Benefits of and the Barriers to the Switch to a Plant-Based Diet. Sustainability, 12(10):4136 

  10. Garnett EE, Balmford A, Sandbrook C, Pilling MA, Marteau TM. 2019. Impact of Increasing Vegetarian Availability on Meal Selection and Sales in Cafeterias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 116(42):20923-20929 

  11. Isabel Miguel, Arnaldo Coelho, Cristela Maia Bairrada. 2021. Modelling Attitude Towards Consumption of Vegan Products. Sustainability, 13(9):9 

  12. Jang HS. 2019. World Agriculture. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea, pp 25-45 

  13. Janssen M, Busch C, Rodiger M, Hamm U. 2016. Motives of Consumers Following a Vegan Diet and their Attitudes Towards Animal Agriculture. Appetite, 105:643-651 

  14. Lea EJ, Crawford D, Worsley A. 2006. Public Views of the Benefits and Barriers to the Consumption of a PlantBased Diet. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 60(7):828-837 

  15. Lee YN, Jang HJ, Choi YW, Choi YS, Oh JE. 2021. A Study on the Consumer Perception and Importance-Performance Analysis of the Vegetarian Meal-Kit Development. J. Korea Contents Assoc., 21(3):324-335 

  16. Lee YJ, Kim TH. 2020. The Influence of Consumption Values on Attitude and Behavioral Intention Towards Vegetarian Restaurant: Focus on Millennial Generation. J. FoodServ. Manag. Soc. Korea., 23(5):315-339 

  17. Makinen OE, Wanhalinna V, Zannini E, Arendt EK. 2016. Foods for Special Dietary Needs: Non-Dairy Plant-Based Milk Substitutes and Fermented Dairy-Type Products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 56(3):339-349 

  18. McClements DJ. 2020. Development of Next-Generation Nutritionally Fortified Plant-Based Milk Substitutes: Structural Design Principles. Foods, 9(4):421. 

  19. Miguel R. 2021. Vegan with Traces of Animal-Derived Ingredients? Improving the Vegan Society's Labelling. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 34(1):1-14 

  20. Mullee A, Vermeire L, Vanaelst B, Mullie P, Deriemaeker P, Leenaert T, De Henauw S, Dunne A, Gunter MJ, Clarys P, Huybrechts I. 2017. Vegetarianism and Meat Consumption: A Comparison of Attitudes and Beliefs between Vegetarian, Semi-Vegetarian, and Omnivorous Subjects in Belgium. Appetite, 114:299-305 

  21. Mustafa F, He Y, Shim YY, Reaney MJT. 2018. Aquafaba, wastewater from chickpea canning, functions as an egg replacer in sponge cake. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech., 53(10):2247-2255 

  22. Park M, Lee Y, Kim K, Park S, Han J. 2019. Actual Conditions of the Food Industry's Application of Food Tech and Its Tasks. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea, pp 105-121 

  23. Park M, Park S, Lee Y. 2020. Current status of alternative food and countermeasures. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea, pp 2-12 

  24. Poore J, Nemecek T. 2018. Reducing Food's Environmental Impacts through Producers and Consumers. Science, 360(6392):987 

  25. Radnitz C, Beezhold B, DiMatteo J. 2015. Investigation of Lifestyle Choices of Individuals Following a Vegan Diet for Health and Ethical Reasons. Appetite, 90:31-36 

  26. Raggiotto F, Mason MC, Moretti A. 2018. Religiosity, Materialism, Consumer Environmental Predisposition. some Insights on Vegan Purchasing Intentions in Italy. Int. J. Consum. Stud., 42(6):613-626 

  27. Salehi G. 2018. Exploring ethical purchase decision-making toward vegan food products. Doctoral degree thesis, Comillas Pontifical University, pp.67-84 

  28. Sethi S, Tyagi S, Anurag R. 2016. Plant-Based Milk Alternatives an Emerging Segment of Functional Beverages: A Review. J. Food Sci. Technol., 53(9):3408-3423 

  29. Shim YY, Mustafa R, Shen J, Ratanapariyanuch K, Reaney MJT. 2018. Composition and properties of aquafaba: water recovered from commercially canned chickpeas. J. Vis. Exp., 132, e56305, 1-14 

  30. Tosun P, Yanar Gurce M. 2018. Consumer Comments about Meat Anti-Consumption. Br. Food J., 120(10):2439 

  31. Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens FA. 2007. Segmentation Based on Consumers' Perceived Importance and Attitude Toward Farm Animal Welfare. Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food, 15(3):91-107 

  32. Wescombe NJ. 2019. Communicating Veganism: Evolving Theoretical Challenges to Mainstreaming Ideas. Stud. Media Commun., 7:1-8 

  33. Yaxin Z, Oh JE, Cho MS. 2020. A Cross-cultural Study of Influence Factors of Meat Substitutes between Korea and China. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 35(5):440-449 

  34. Yoon S, Cho H, Lee K. 2021. Substitute meat. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, Eumseong, Korea, pp 1-4 

  35. BBC news. 2019. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/korean/news-49298940., [accessed July 20, 2021.] 

  36. Henrik Maass. 2018. Meat substitutes and lentil pasta: Legume products on the rise in Europe University of Hohenheim. Available from: https://www.uni-hohenheim.de/en/pressrelease?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D39041&cHash7d3379678828c2cddf90799cde96b63c, [accessed July 11, 2021.] 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로