[논문]A Comparison of Diagnostic Stability of the ASIA Impairment Scale Versus Frankel Classification Systems for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Kirshblum, Steven; Botticello, Amanda; Benedetto, John; Donovan, Jayne; Marino, Ralph; Hsieh, Shelly; Wagaman, Nicole

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.016

A Comparison of Diagnostic Stability of the ASIA Impairment Scale Versus Frankel Classification Systems for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, v.101 no.9, 2020년, pp.1556 - 1562

Kirshblum, Steven (Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School) , Botticello, Amanda (Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School) , Benedetto, John (Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation) , Donovan, Jayne (Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School) , Marino, Ralph (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University) , Hsieh, Shelly (Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School) , Wagaman, Nicole (University of Missouri-Columbia)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Abstract Objective To determine whether the “sacral sparing” definition for completeness of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a more stable definition than the previously used Frankel Classification. Design Retrospective analysis of individuals enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database between 2011 and 2018. Setting SCIMS centers. Participants Individuals (N=804) with traumatic SCI who were at least 16 years old at time of injury, were admitted to rehabilitation within 30 days, had American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A-D at admission, and had complete neurologic data at the time of admission and 1 year. Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Frankel and AIS scores were computed for a cohort of 804 eligible cases. Stability was compared between the 2 classification systems by calculating the proportions of cases in which regression (conversion to a more severe impairment level) was observed. Results A larger proportion of individuals classified with “incomplete” injuries (grades B-D) at the time of admission using the Frankel system regressed to complete status at 1 year compared with the AIS criteria (9.4% vs 2.0%). Those with grade B injuries regressed to grade A more often using the Frankel system compared with the AIS system (19.7% to 5.4%). A larger proportion of people diagnosed as Frankel grade C or D regressed to Frankel grade A compared with individuals diagnosed as AIS grade C or D who regressed to AIS grade A (5.0% to 1.1%). Conclusions More individuals diagnosed with neurologically incomplete SCI regressed to complete status at 1 year when using the Frankel system compared with AIS classification, which is based on sacral sparing. This reinforces the finding that the “sacral sparing” definition is a more stable classification in traumatic SCI.

주제어

참고문헌 (25)

2019 International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury patients
Paraplegia Frankel 7 179 1969 The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia
1982 Standards for neurological classification of spinal injury patients
1990 Standard for neurological classification of spinal injured patients. 3rd ed
Spinal Cord Waters 29 573 1991 10.1038/sc.1991.85 Definition of complete spinal cord injury

상세보기
Clin Ortho Rel Res Staufer 112 9 1975 Diagnosis and prognosis of acute cervical spinal cord injury
1992 Standard for neurological classification of spinal injured patients. 4th ed
J Spinal Cord Med Kirshblum 34 535 2011 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695 International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011)

상세보기
2015 International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury patients. 7th ed
Spinal Cord Maynard 35 266 1997 10.1038/sj.sc.3100432 International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury patients

상세보기
2000 International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury patients. 6th ed
Spinal Cord van Middendorp 47 809 2009 10.1038/sc.2009.44 Is determination between complete and incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury clinically relevant? Validation of the ASIA sacral sparing criteria in a prospective cohort of 432 patients

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Zariffa 93 905 2012 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.024 Functional motor preservation below the level of injury in subjects with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade A spinal cord injuries

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Chen 97 1797 2016 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.027 Spinal cord injury model systems: review of program and national database from 1970 to 2015

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Chen 97 1610 2016 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.017 changing demographics and injury profile of new traumatic spinal cord injuries in the United States, 1972-2014

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Marino 80 1391 1999 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90249-6 Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems

상세보기
Spine J Zariffa 12 389 2012 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.03.028 Sacral sparing in SCI: beyond the S4-S5 and anorectal examination

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Marino 97 1642 2016 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.006 Reliability and validity of s3 pressure sensation as an alternative to deep anal pressure in neurologic classification of persons with spinal cord injury

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Kirshblum 97 1647 2016 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.012 Patterns of sacral sparing components on neurologic recovery in newly injured persons with traumatic spinal cord injury

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Marino 92 369 2011 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.027 Upper- and lower-extremity motor recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: an update from the National Spinal Cord Injury Database

상세보기
J Neurotrauma Spiess 26 2027 2009 10.1089/neu.2008.0760 Conversion in ASIA Impairment Scale during the first year after traumatic spinal cord injury

상세보기
Spinal Cord Steeves 49 257 2011 10.1038/sc.2010.99 Extent of spontaneous motor recovery after traumatic cervical sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury

상세보기
J Neurosurg Spine El Teche 28 436 2018 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17107 The natural history of complete spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of 1162 patients and a meta-analysis of modern data

상세보기
Dis Colon Rectum De Ocampo 50 1639 2007 10.1007/s10350-007-0257-y Rectoanal sensorimotor response in humans during rectal distension

상세보기
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Kirshblum 92 376 2011 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.242 The impact of sacral sparing in motor complete spinal cord injury

상세보기

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

A Comparison of Diagnostic Stability of the ASIA Impairment Scale Versus Frankel Classification Systems for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (25)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 URL 링크

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트