최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Sustainability, v.11 no.16, 2019년, pp.4495 -
Yun, JinHyo Joseph , Jeong, EuiSeob , Zhao, Xiaofei , Hahm, Sung Deuk , Kim, KyungHun
Responding to the lack of empirical research on the effect of collective intelligence on open innovation in the fourth industrial revolution, we examined the relationship between collective intelligence and open innovation. Collective intelligence or crowd innovation not only produces creative ideas...
Levy Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace 1997
Silver, David, Huang, Aja, Maddison, Chris J., Guez, Arthur, Sifre, Laurent, van den Driessche, George, Schrittwieser, Julian, Antonoglou, Ioannis, Panneershelvam, Veda, Lanctot, Marc, Dieleman, Sander, Grewe, Dominik, Nham, John, Kalchbrenner, Nal, Sutskever, Ilya, Lillicrap, Timothy, Leach, Madeleine, Kavukcuoglu, Koray, Graepel, Thore, Hassabis, Demis. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, vol.529, no.7587, 484-489.
Yun, JinHyo Joseph, Won, DongKyu, Park, Kyungbae. Dynamics from open innovation to evolutionary change. Journal of open innovation : technology, market, and complexity, vol.2, no.1, 1-22.
Sternberg Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity 1995
Woolley, Anita Williams, Chabris, Christopher F., Pentland, Alex, Hashmi, Nada, Malone, Thomas W.. Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science, vol.330, no.6004, 686-688.
Downes Learning networks and connective knowledge Collective Intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of Web-Based Communities and Networking 2010 1
Surowiecki The Wisdom of Crowds 2005
Mergel, Ines, Desouza, Kevin C.. Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector: The Case of Challenge.gov. Public administration review, vol.73, no.6, 882-890.
Malone, Thomas W., Laubacher, Robert, Dellarocas, Chrysanthos. The collective intelligence genome. IEEE engineering management review, vol.38, no.3, 38-52.
Lane Collective Intelligence for Competitive Advantage: Crowdsourcing and Open Innovation 2010
Collm Managing crowd innovation in public administration Int. Public Manag. Rev. 2012 13 1
Bonabeau Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2009 50 45
Vieweg Collective Intelligence in Disaster: Examination of the Phenomenon in the Aftermath of the 2007 Virginia Tech. Shooting 2008
Wolpert An introduction to collective intelligence arXiv 1999
Simon, Herbert A.. Bradie on Polanyi on the Meno Paradox. Philosophy of science, vol.43, no.1, 147-150.
Polanyi The Tacit Dimension 2009
Huizingh, E.K.R.E.. Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, vol.31, no.1, 2-9.
Franzoni, C., Sauermann, H.. Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research policy, vol.43, no.1, 1-20.
Yun, JinHyo Joseph. How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian Dynamics of Open Innovation. Journal of open innovation : technology, market, and complexity, vol.1, no.1, 1-20.
Seltzer, Ethan, Mahmoudi, Dillon. Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing : Challenges and Opportunities for Planning. Journal of planning literature, vol.28, no.1, 3-18.
van de Vrande, V., Vanhaverbeke, W., Gassmann, O.. Broadening the scope of open innovation: past research, current state and future directions. International journal of technology management : Journal international de la gestion technologique, vol.52, no.3, 221-235.
Hayek The use of knowledge in society Am. Econ. Rev. 1945 35 519
Lee, MinHwa, Yun, JinHyo Joseph, Pyka, Andreas, Won, DongKyu, Kodama, Fumio, Schiuma, Giovanni, Park, HangSik, Jeon, Jeonghwan, Park, KyungBae, Jung, KwangHo, Yan, Min-Ren, Lee, SamYoul, Zhao, Xiaofei. How to Respond to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Second Information Technology Revolution? Dynamic New Combinations between Technology, Market, and Society through Open Innovation. Journal of open innovation : technology, market, and complexity, vol.4, no.3, 21-.
Howe Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business 2008
MARKOWITZ, HARRY M.. Foundations of Portfolio Theory. The Journal of finance, vol.46, no.2, 469-477.
Markowitz Portfolio selection J. Financ. 1952 7 77
McAfee Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future 2017
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System www.cryptovest.co.uk
Agarwal, Rajshree, Ganco, Martin, Ziedonis, Rosemarie H.. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic management journal, vol.30, no.13, 1349-1374.
Sternitzke, C., Bartkowski, A., Schramm, R.. Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools. World patent information, vol.30, no.2, 115-131.
Somaya Patents, licensing, and entrepreneurship: Effectuating innovation in multi-invention contexts Technological Know-How, Organizational Capabilities, and Strategic Management 2008 287
Galison, Peter, Hevly, Bruce, Weinberg, Alvin M.. Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Physics today, vol.45, no.11, 89-90.
Ma, Z., Lee, Y.. Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980-2005. Technovation, vol.28, no.6, 379-390.
Briggs, K.. Co-owner relationships conducive to high quality joint patents. Research policy, vol.44, no.8, 1566-1573.
Belderbos, R., Cassiman, B., Faems, D., Leten, B., Van Looy, B.. Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners. Research policy, vol.43, no.5, 841-852.
Fier Is it worth all the trouble? an assessment of the economic value of firm patent applications with shared intellectual property rights in the biotechnology industry Technology Transfer in a Global Economy 2012 123
Yun, Jinhyo Joseph, Mohan, Avvari V., Zhao, Xiaofei. Collectivism, Individualism and Open Innovation: Introduction to the Special Issue on ‘Technology, Open Innovation, Markets and Complexity’. Science, technology and society : an international journal devoted to the developing world, vol.22, no.3, 379-387.
Yun, J.J., Avvari, M.V., Jeong, E.S., Lim, D.W.. Introduction of an objective model to measure open innovation and its application to the information technology convergence sector. International journal of technology, policy and management, vol.14, no.4, 383-400.
Hagedoorn, John, Cloodt, Myriam. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?. Research policy, vol.32, no.8, 1365-1379.
Brouwer, Erik, Kleinknecht, Alfred. Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent. : An exploration of CIS micro data. Research policy, vol.28, no.6, 615-624.
Chen, Yu-Shan, Chang, Ke-Chiun. The nonlinear nature of the relationships between the patent traits and corporate performance. Scientometrics, vol.82, no.1, 201-210.
Jaffe, Adam B., Trajtenberg, Manuel, Henderson, Rebecca. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. The Quarterly journal of economics, vol.108, no.3, 577-598.
Park, Yongtae, Lee, Sungjoo, Lee, Sora. Patent analysis for promoting technology transfer in multi-technology industries: the Korean aerospace industry case. The Journal of technology transfer, vol.37, no.3, 355-374.
Chen, Y.S., Chang, K.C.. The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value - The case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological forecasting and social change, vol.77, no.1, 20-33.
Suzuki, Jun, Kodama, Fumio. Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan : Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research policy, vol.33, no.3, 531-549.
Ejermo Patent Diversity as a Predictor of Regional Innovativeness in Sweden 2003
Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., Veugelers, R.. Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research policy, vol.45, no.3, 707-723.
Yun, Jinhyo, Jeong, EuiSeob, Lee, YoungKyu, Kim, KyungHun. The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea. Sustainability, vol.10, no.7, 2459-.
Mowery, David C, Nelson, Richard R, Sampat, Bhaven N, Ziedonis, Arvids A. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, vol.30, no.1, 99-119.
Buganza Investigating Inter.-Industry Differences in the Implementation of Open Innovation, in Open Innovation Research, Management and Practice World Sci. 2013 23 323
Pavitt, K.. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research policy, vol.13, no.6, 343-373.
Kale From imitation to innovation: The evolution of R&D capabilities and learning processes in the Indian pharmaceutical industry Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2007 10.1080/09537320701521317 19 589
Kim, Youngbae, Kim, Linsu, Lee, Jinjoo. Innovation strategy of local pharmaceutical firms in Korea: a multivariate analysis. Technology analysis & strategic management, vol.1, no.1, 29-44.
Shin How does the partner type in R&D alliances impact technological innovation performance? A study on the Korean biotechnology industry Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2016 10.1007/s10490-015-9439-7 33 141
Lechevalier, S., Nishimura, J., Storz, C.. Diversity in patterns of industry evolution: How an intrapreneurial regime contributed to the emergence of the service robot industry. Research policy, vol.43, no.10, 1716-1729.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.