다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Sustainability, v.13 no.14, 2021년, pp.7828 -
Dolins, Sigma (Mobility and Systems, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Lindholmspiren 3A, 41756 Gö) , Strömberg, Helena (teborg, Sweden) , Wong, Yale Z. (Design & Human Factors, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gö) , Karlsson, MariAnne (teborg, Sweden)
AI-Helper
As connected, electric, and autonomous vehicle (AV) services are developed for cities, the research is conclusive that the use of these services must be shared to achieve maximum efficiency. Yet, few agencies have prioritised designing an AV system that focuses on dynamic ridepooling, and there rema...
Haboucha User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2017 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010 78 37
Schwarting Planning and decision-making for autonomous vehicles Annu. Rev. Control. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2018 10.1146/annurev-control-060117-105157 1 187
Becker Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles Transportation 2017 10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9 44 1293
Dias A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services Transportation 2017 10.1007/s11116-017-9797-8 44 1307
10.5822/978-1-61091-906-7_1 Sperling, D., Pike, S., and Chase, R. (2018). Will the Transportation Revolutions Improve Our Lives-Or Make Them Worse?. Three Revolutions, Island Press.
Pakusch, C., Stevens, G., and Bossauer, P. (2019, October 20). Shared Autonomous Vehicles: Potentials for a Sustainable Mobility and Risks of Unintended Effects. Available online: https://wwww.easychair.org/publications/download/6LTq.
OECD, ITF, and CPB (2019, November 27). How Shared Self-Driving Cars Could Change City Traffic (Corporate Partnership Board Report). Available online: http://www.itfoecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/15cpb_self-drivingcars.pdf.
Wang An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: Using an extended technology acceptance model Transportation 2018 10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4 47 397
Gurumurthy Benefits and costs of ride-sharing in shared automated vehicles across Austin, Texas: Opportunities for congestion pricing Transp. Res. Rec. 2019 10.1177/0361198119850785 2673 548
Zhang Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach Sustain. Cities Soc. 2015 10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.006 19 34
Fraedrich Autonomous driving, the built environment and policy implications Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.018 122 162
Clewlow, R.R., and Mishra, G.S. (2021, May 01). Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82w2z91j.
Wong Mobility as a service (MaaS): Charting a future context Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.030 131 5
Hall Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit? J. Urban Econ. 2018 10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.003 108 36
Merat, N., Madigan, R., and Nordhoff, S. (2017). Human Factors, User Requirements, and User Acceptance of Ride-Sharing in Automated Vehicles. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, No. 2017/10, OECD Publishing.
Greenblatt Automated vehicles, on-demand mobility, and environmental impacts Curr. Sustain. Renew. Energy Rep. 2015 2 74
Chavis Development of a mode choice model for general purpose flexible-route transit systems Transp. Res. Rec. 2017 10.3141/2650-16 2650 133
Lavieri Investigating objective and subjective factors influencing the adoption, frequency, and characteristics of ridehailing trips Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2019 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.037 105 100
Smith, A. (2016, August 29). On-Demand: Ridehailing Apps. Online Press of Pew Research Center. Available online: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/05/19/on-demand-ridehailing-apps/.
Buliung Driving factors behind successful carpool formation and use Transp. Res. Rec. 2009 10.3141/2118-05 2118 31
Delhomme Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: Which factors contribute the most to carpooling? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2016 10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.014 42 1
Chen Understanding ridesplitting behavior of on-demand ride services: An ensemble learning approach Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2017 10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.018 76 51
Malodia A study of carpooling behaviour using a stated preference web survey in selected cities of India Transp. Plan. Technol. 2016 10.1080/03081060.2016.1174368 39 538
Tahmasseby Propensity to participate in a peer-to-peer social-network-based carpooling system J. Adv. Transp. 2016 10.1002/atr.1326 50 240
Sarriera To share or not to share: Investigating the social aspects of dynamic ridesharing Transp. Res. Rec. 2017 10.3141/2605-11 2605 109
Amirkiaee Why do people rideshare? An experimental study Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018 10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.025 55 9
Wicki In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: Insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA Environ. Res. Lett. 2019 10.1088/1748-9326/ab30a2 14 084048
Tennant, C., Howard, S., Franks, B., Bauer, M., Stares, S., Pansegrau, P., Stysko-Kunkowska, M., and Cuevas-Badallo, A. (2017). Autonomous Vehicles-Negotiating a Place on the Road: A Study on How Drivers Feel about Interacting with Autonomous Vehicles on the Road, London School of Economics and Political Science.
10.3390/joitmc6040106 Golbaebi, G. (2020). Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: A systematic review of the literature. J Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 6.
Madigan What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems Transp. Res. part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2017 10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007 50 55
Addison Lee Ltd. (2019, May 08). MERGE Greenwich: The MERGE Greenwich Project. Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Research and Development Projects, Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/737778/ccav-research-and-development-projects.pdf.
Barbour Shared automated vehicles: A statistical analysis of consumer use likelihoods and concerns Transp. Policy 2019 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.013 80 86
Sanguinetti, A., Kurani, K., and Ferguson, B. (2019, May 01). Is It OK to Get in a Car with a Stranger? Risks and Benefits of Ride-pooling in Shared Automated Vehicles. UC Office of the President: University of California Institute of Transportation Studies. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1cb6n6r9.
10.4324/9780367816698 Mulley, C., Nelson, J.D., and Ison, S. (2021). Flexible Transport Services. Handbook of Public Transport, Routledge.
Neoh What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis Transportation 2017 10.1007/s11116-015-9661-7 44 423
Taylor “Happy Rides Are All Alike; Every Unhappy Ride Is Unhappy in Its Own Way”: Passengers’ Emotional Experiences While Using a Mobile Application for Ride-Sharing Information in Contemporary Society. iConference 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2019 Volume 11420 706
Krueger, R.A., and Casey, M.A. (2001). Designing and Conducting Focus Group Interviews, The Social Development Family of the World Bank. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.607.4701&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Ho, L., Mulley, C., Lin, H., and Royle, D. How do you tell if a regional area may support an on-demand service? In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo 16), Singapore, 25-29 August 2019.
Merton, R.K., Fiske, M., and Kendall, P.L. (1990). The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures, Free Press. [2nd ed.].
Quarles, N.T., and Kockelman, K.M. (2020, January 23). Americans’ Plans for Acquiring and Using Electric, Shared and Self-Driving Vehicles. Proceedings of the 99th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.
Zhao, J. (2017). Humanizing Travel: Investigating the User Identification of, Attitude towards and Preference for Dynamic Ridesharing Services (No. MITR25-18), New England University Transportation Center, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
Aarhaug Implications of ride-sourcing and self-driving vehicles on the need for regulation in unscheduled passenger transport Res. Transp. Econ. 2018 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.026 69 573
Miner, J.B. (2005). Motivation-hygiene theory. Organizational Behavior One: Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership, ME Sharpe Inc.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.