$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

The Regional Command of the Commons: Japan's Military Power

The Korean journal of defense analysis, v.17 no.1, 2005년, pp.235 - 258  

Ritter, Tripp

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Japan is traditionally viewed as a weak military power. When considered in light of Barry Posen's Command of the Commons model, Japan can be seen as a major power and of particular significance to East Asia. Japan has a “regional” command of the commons. In other words, Japan is predom...

참고문헌 (70)

  1. 10.2307/2539024 Thomas U. Berger, “From Sword to Chrysanthemum: Japan's Culture of Anti-Militarism” International Security , Vol. 17, No. 4 (Spring 1993), pp. 119-50. 

  2. 2003. Report on Allied Contributions to the Common Defense 12Washington, DC: Department of Defense. Department of Defense 

  3. Information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), available athttp://www.sipri.org/contents/milap/milex/mex_major_spenders.pdf. 

  4. 10.1162/0162288041762968 Jennifer Lind, “Pacifism or Passing the Buck?” International Security , Vol. 29, No. 1 (Summer 2004), pp. 92-101. 

  5. 10.1162/016228803322427965 Barry Posen, “Command of the Commons,” International Security , Vol. 28, No. 1 (Summer 2003), pp. 5-46. 

  6. For information on the Invincible class carriers, available athttp://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/invincible.htm 

  7. “The Russian Nuclear Fleet Might Disappear in Ten Years,” Bellona Northern Fleet Report , Nov. 2004. 

  8. For information on the Chinese variant of the Sovremenny, available athttp://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/haizhou.htm. 

  9. Brown, Harold. 2003. Chinese Military Power 27New York: Council of Foreign Relations. 

  10. For information on the Arleigh Burke, available athttp://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/ddg-51.htm.For information on the Kongo, available athttp://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/kongo.htm. 

  11. For information on AEGIS, available athttp://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/weaps/aegis.htm. 

  12. Lind, “Pacifism or Passing the Buck?” p. 89. 

  13. See,http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/kongo.htm. 

  14. Adam Ward, “Japan's Push For Missile Defense,” IISS Strategic Comment , October 2003. 

  15. David Miller, “Navy Mourns End of Sea Power Dream,” Jane's Defence Weekly , Nov. 4, 1995. 

  16. 10.1515/9781685851965 Wooley, Peter. 2000. Japan's Navy-Politics and Paradox 1971-2000 66Lynne Reinner: London. 

  17. Ibid, p. 81. 

  18. Otto Kreisher, “As Underwater Threat Re-emerges, Navy Renews Emphasis on ASW” Seapower , October 2004. 

  19. Manara, Nicole. Aug. 5 2004. Military Trends in the United Kingdom Aug. 5, 9Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies. 

  20. “Japan Eyes Helicopter Carrier,” Mainichi Shimbun , Japan, Aug. 30, 2003. 

  21. Nimitz class carriers (97,000 tons, 85 aircraft) Wasp Class Amphibious Carrier (40,500 tons, 20-40 aircraft), Giuseppe Garibaldi class carrier (26,600 tons, 8-12 aircraft), Illustrious class carrier (20,600 tons, 20-30 aircraft) For information, available athttp://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/. 

  22. For information on the Charles DeGaulle, available athttp://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/cdg.htm. 

  23. Congressional Budget Office. February 2001. Budget Options February, 137Washington, DC: CBO. 

  24. Richard Scot, “Seventy crew confirmed dead in Chinese Ming-class submarine accident,” Jane's Defence Weekly , May 27, 2003. 

  25. Lind, “Pacifism or Passing the Buck?” p. 97. 

  26. Posen, “Command of the Commons,” p. 15. 

  27. For details on F-15J and other foreign variants, available athttp://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-15-fms.htm 

  28. See,http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-15-variants.htm. 

  29. “In Brief-Japanese F-15s in Refueling Exercise,” Jane's Defence Weekly , May 27, 2003. 

  30. See International Institute for Strategic Studies, Military Balance 2004 (IISS, London, 2004). 

  31. The United States and Asian Security Chuen Cristina 187 2002 

  32. Brown, “Chinese Military Power,” p. 26. 

  33. Lind, “Pacifism or Passing the Buck?” p. 98. 

  34. Fumio Ota, “Jointness in the Japanese Self Defense Forces,” Joint Forces Quarterly , No. 27 (Winter 2000/2001), pp. 57-60. 

  35. Desmond Balland Euan Graham, “Japanese SIGINT takes off,” Jane's Intelligence Review , December 2000. 

  36. Robert Hewson, “New ‘Mainstay’ AEW&C aircraft flying in China,” Jane's Defence Weekly , April 21, 2004. 

  37. Paul Thompson, “The War Machine That Isn't,” Japan Times, June 20, 2004. 

  38. 10.55540/0031-1723.2205 William Rapp, “Past its Prime? The Future of the U.S.Japan Alliance,” Parameters (Summer 2004), p. 110. 

  39. Gary Stoller, “JDAM smart bombs prove to be accurate-and a good buy,” USA Today , March 24, 2003. 

  40. For Maverick statistics, available athttp://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/agm-65-specs.htm. 

  41. C1C Matthew Hurley, “The BEKAA Valley Air Battle, June 1982: Lessons Mislearned?” Aerospace Power Journal (Winter 1989). 

  42. Robert Karniol, “Japan considers options following satellite setback,” Jane's Defence Weekly , Dec. 10, 2003. 

  43. Lewis, James A. January 2004. China as a Military Space Competitor January, 3Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies. 

  44. 10.21236/ADA422203 Hayden, COL Dale. April 2003. The International Development of Space and the Impact on U.S. Space Policy April, 18Boston: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. 

  45. Lewis, China as a Military Space Competitor , pp. 4-6. 

  46. Guy Toremans, “Japan puts naval emphasis on MCM,” Jane's Navy International , Sept. 1, 2002. 

  47. Vice Adm. Albert Konetzni, Jr. “Mine Warfare” CHIPS Magazine (Winter 2003). 

  48. 10.1162/0162288041588304 Lyle Goldstein and William Murray, “Undersea Dragons, China's Maturing Submarine Force” International Security , Vol. 28, No. 4 (Spring 2004), p. 185. 

  49. 10.21236/ADA391117 O'Donogue, Patrick M. 2000. Theater Missile Defense in Japan: Implications For the U.S.China-Japan Strategic Relationship 11-13. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute. pp. 

  50. The Tests of War and the Strains of Peace Brown Harold 1998 

  51. “GSDF's tank forces may be scaled down,” Kyodo News , June 24, 2004. 

  52. Tadashi Okano, “Japan plans first special ops unit,” Jane's Defence Weekly , Feb. 26, 2003. 

  53. Ian Bostock, “Asia's amphibious capability assessed,” Jane's Intelligence Review. 

  54. Chinworth, Michael. 1992. Inside Japan's Defense 47Brasseys: Washington. 

  55. Akira Hattori, Reconstruction and Rationalization of the Japanese Defense Industry , a paper presented at ECAAR panel June 2000, available athttp://www.ecaar.org/Articles/hattori.pdf. 

  56. Michael Chinworth, Inside Japan's Defense , p. 20. 

  57. Green, Michael. 1995. Arming Japan 23-25. Columbia University: New York. pp. 

  58. Akira Hattori, Reconstruction and Rationalization of the Japanese Defense Industry , p. 3. 

  59. Robert Hewson, “Air-to-Air Missiles: Command of the Air,” Jane's Defence Weekly , May 28, 2003. 

  60. Paul Thompson, “Vast Budget Fuels Huge Arms Industry,” Japan Times , June 20, 2004. 

  61. For information on the Tornado, available athttp://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/tornado.htm. 

  62. Michael Chinworth, Inside Japan's Defense , p. 141. 

  63. See,http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/kongo.htm. 

  64. Swaine, Michael and Swanger, Rachel. 2001. Takashi Kawakami Japan and Ballistic Missile Defense 6RAND: Los Angeles, CA. 

  65. 10.1162/016228800560291 Daniel Byman and Matthew Waxman “Kosovo and the Great Air Power Debate,” International Security , Vol. 24, No. 4 (Spring 2000), p. 7. 

  66. Lessons of Modern War-Volume II: The Iran-Iraq War Cordesman Anthony 1 1990 

  67. 10.1162/016228800560453 Michael O'Hanlon, “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan,” International Security , Vol. 25, No. 2 (Fall 2000), pp. 51-86. 

  68. 10.1162/isec.23.4.49 Thomas Christensen, “China, the U.S.Japan Alliance and the Security Dilemma in East Asia,” International Security , Vol. 23, No. 4 (Spring 1999), pp. 58-60. 

  69. 10.1162/isec.23.4.81 Robert Ross, “The Geography of Peace,” International Security , Vol. 23, No. 4 (Spring 1999), pp. 81-118. 

  70. “Backing Off: Due Process,” Asahi Shimbun , Nov. 9, 2004. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트