최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Evaluation and program planning, v.63, 2017년, pp.18 - 28
Kim, E. , Kim, S. , Kim, H.
For decades, efforts have been made globally to measure the performance of large-scale public projects and to develop a framework to perform such measurements due to the complexity and dynamics of R&D and stakeholder interests. Still, limitations such as the use of a simply modified model and the la...
African Journal of Business Management Ahmadabadi 6 26 7736 2012 Research and development project evaluation based on an integrated common set of weights in data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach
Research Evaluation Arnold 21 5 332 2012 10.1093/reseval/rvs025 Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme
Evaluation and Program Planning Ayob 58 20 2016 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.006 The historical path of evaluation as reflected in the content of Evaluation and Program Planning
Project Management Journal Barclay 40 4 74 2009 10.1002/pmj.20138 Toward a more practical approach to evaluating programs: The multi-objective realization approach
Research Policy Bayona-Saez 39 10 1375 2010 10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.007 Assessing the effectiveness of the Eureka Program
Public Administrative Review Behn 63 5 586 2003 10.1111/1540-6210.00322 Why measure performance? Different purpose require different measures
International Journal of Project Management Bertolini 24 5 422 2006 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.005 Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract
Administrative Science Quarterly Brass 29 4 518 1984 10.2307/2392937 Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization
International Journal of Public Sector Management Brown 16 3 230 2003 10.1108/09513550310472311 Change management practices: Is a hybrid model a better alternative for public sector agencies?
International Journal of Production Research Bullinger 40 15 3533 2002 10.1080/00207540210161669 Analysing supply chain performance using a balanced measurement method
Chelimsky 1985 Program evaluation: Patterns and directions
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries Chung 21 1 44 2011 10.1002/hfm.20214 Evaluation of radio-frequency identification projects in public sectors of Korea
R&D Management Coccia 31 4 453 2001 10.1111/1467-9310.00231 A basic model for evaluating R&D performance: Theory and application in Italy
Evaluation and Program Planning Cousins 44 1 2014 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.001 Government and voluntary sector differences in organizational capacity to do and use evaluation
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work Darby 7 1-2 5 2010 10.1080/15433710903175833 GPRA and the development of performance measures
Davies 2005 Paper presented at the Economics and Social Research Council Symposium on Assessing Non-Academic Impact of Research Assessing the impact of social science research: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues
Hospitality Research Journal Dev 14 3 23 1991 10.1177/109634809101400304 Franchising and other operating arrangement in the lodging industry: A strategic comparison
Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly Denton 41 1 94 2000 10.1177/001088040004100127 Implementing a balanced scorecard approach to managing hotel operation: The case of White Lodging Services
Macroeconomic Dynamics Diewert 15 4 537 2011 10.1017/S136510051000012X Capitalizing R&D expenditure
Evaluation Drew 17 4 383 2011 10.1177/1356389011421699 Using social network analysis to evaluate a complex policy network
Dunn 1994 Public policy analysis: An introduction
Eickelmann 253 2001 Information technology evaluation methods and management A comparative analysis of the balanced scorecard as applied in government and industry organizations
Evaluation Research Society Standards Committee 7 1982 Standards for evaluation practice Standards for program evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation Fetterman 28 2 179 2007 10.1177/1098214007301350 Empowerment evaluation: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
Evaluation Georghiou 1 2 171 1995 10.1177/135638909500100204 Assessing the framework programmes: A meta-evaluation
Research Policy Georghiou 29 4-5 657 2000 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00094-3 Evaluating technology programs: Tools and methods
Research Evaluation Graham 21 5 354 2012 10.1093/reseval/rvs027 Evaluating health research impact: Development and implementation of the Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions impact framework
International Journal of Operations & Production Management Greatbanks 27 8 846 2007 10.1108/01443570710763804 The impact of balanced scorecards in a public sector environment: Empirical evidence from Dunedin City Council, New Zealand
Evaluation Greene 7 1 25 2001 10.1177/13563890122209504 The merits of mixing methods in evaluation
International Journal of Production Economics Haner 80 1 31 2002 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00240-2 Innovation quality-a conceptual framework
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management Harris 13 3 120 2001 10.1108/09596110110388909 Key performance indicator European hotel properties: General manager's choice and company profile
Iansiti 2004 The Keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, & sustainability
Jansen 29 2013 Business network management as a survival strategy: A tale of two software ecosystems
Kaplan 1999 The balanced scorecard for public-sector orgarnisations
Harvard Business Review Kaplan 70 71 1992 The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance
International Journal of Management Reviews Kerssens-van Drongelen 2 2 111 2000 10.1111/1468-2370.00034 Performance measurement in industrial R&D
Omega Kim 30 1 19 2002 10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00049-4 An effective R&D performance measurement system: Survey of Korean R&D researchers
Oxford Review of Economic Policy Klein 13 4 29 1997 10.1093/oxrep/13.4.29 The risk premium for evaluating public projects
Social Psychology Quarterly Krackhardt 51 2 123 1988 10.2307/2786835 Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation
Industrial Management & Data Systems Leem 104 1 78 2004 10.1108/02635570410514115 A classification of mobile business models and its applications
Evaluation and Program Planning Melkers 20 1 57 1997 10.1016/S0149-7189(96)00037-7 Politics and the political setting as an influence on evaluation activities: National research and technology policy programs in the United States and Canada
Scientometrics Meyer 51 1 163 2001 10.1023/A:1010572914033 Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology
American Journal of Evaluation Miller 27 3 296 2006 10.1177/109821400602700303 Taking stock of empowerment evaluation: An empirical review
Nachmias 1979 Public policy evaluation: Approaches and methods
Information & Management Motiwalla 42 5 651 2005 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.001 An intra- and inter-industry analysis of e-business effectiveness
International Journal of Public Sector Management Northcott 25 3 166 2012 10.1108/09513551211224234 Using the balanced scorecard to manage performance in public sector organizations: Issues and challenges
Olve 1999 Performance drivers: A practical guide to using the balanced scorecard
Asian Journal of Technology Innovation Osawa 14 2 93 2006 10.1080/19761597.2006.9668620 An empirical analysis of the valley of death: Large-scale R&D project performance in a Japanese diversified company
International Journal of Project Management Patanakul 34 3 452 2016 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.001 What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects?
International Journal of Project Management Pillai 20 2 165 2002 10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00056-9 Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment
Scott 1991 Social network analysis: A handbook
Sedera 1 2001 Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Conference on Information Systems A balanced scorecard approach to enterprise systems performance measurement
Research Evaluation Shishido 21 5 344 2012 10.1093/reseval/rvs029 Research on derivative effects created by Japanese national R&D projects
International Journal of Service Industry Management Silvestro 1 2 54 1990 10.1108/EUM0000000002803 Quality measurement in service
Stern 2005 Evaluation research methods
Public Policy and Administration Talbot 14 3 15 1999 10.1177/095207679901400302 Public performance - towards a new model?
Evaluation and Program Planning Tang 34 4 343 2011 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.04.002 Optimizing an immersion ESL curriculum using analytic hierarchy process
Evaluation and Program Planning Varmazyar 58 125 2016 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005 A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach
Wasserman 1994 Social network analysis: Methods and applications
Evaluation and Program Planning Wu 34 1 37 2011 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.001 Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard
R&D Management Zaidman 17 4 269 1987 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1987.tb00061.x Project evaluation: Externalities must not be disregarded
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.