$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Development of an evaluation framework for publicly funded R&D projects: The case of Korea's Next Generation Network

Evaluation and program planning, v.63, 2017년, pp.18 - 28  

Kim, E. ,  Kim, S. ,  Kim, H.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

For decades, efforts have been made globally to measure the performance of large-scale public projects and to develop a framework to perform such measurements due to the complexity and dynamics of R&D and stakeholder interests. Still, limitations such as the use of a simply modified model and the la...

참고문헌 (64)

  1. African Journal of Business Management Ahmadabadi 6 26 7736 2012 Research and development project evaluation based on an integrated common set of weights in data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach 

  2. Research Evaluation Arnold 21 5 332 2012 10.1093/reseval/rvs025 Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme 

  3. Evaluation and Program Planning Ayob 58 20 2016 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.006 The historical path of evaluation as reflected in the content of Evaluation and Program Planning 

  4. Project Management Journal Barclay 40 4 74 2009 10.1002/pmj.20138 Toward a more practical approach to evaluating programs: The multi-objective realization approach 

  5. Research Policy Bayona-Saez 39 10 1375 2010 10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.007 Assessing the effectiveness of the Eureka Program 

  6. Public Administrative Review Behn 63 5 586 2003 10.1111/1540-6210.00322 Why measure performance? Different purpose require different measures 

  7. International Journal of Project Management Bertolini 24 5 422 2006 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.005 Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract 

  8. Administrative Science Quarterly Brass 29 4 518 1984 10.2307/2392937 Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization 

  9. International Journal of Public Sector Management Brown 16 3 230 2003 10.1108/09513550310472311 Change management practices: Is a hybrid model a better alternative for public sector agencies? 

  10. International Journal of Production Research Bullinger 40 15 3533 2002 10.1080/00207540210161669 Analysing supply chain performance using a balanced measurement method 

  11. Chelimsky 1985 Program evaluation: Patterns and directions 

  12. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries Chung 21 1 44 2011 10.1002/hfm.20214 Evaluation of radio-frequency identification projects in public sectors of Korea 

  13. R&D Management Coccia 31 4 453 2001 10.1111/1467-9310.00231 A basic model for evaluating R&D performance: Theory and application in Italy 

  14. Evaluation and Program Planning Cousins 44 1 2014 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.001 Government and voluntary sector differences in organizational capacity to do and use evaluation 

  15. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work Darby 7 1-2 5 2010 10.1080/15433710903175833 GPRA and the development of performance measures 

  16. Davies 2005 Paper presented at the Economics and Social Research Council Symposium on Assessing Non-Academic Impact of Research Assessing the impact of social science research: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues 

  17. Hospitality Research Journal Dev 14 3 23 1991 10.1177/109634809101400304 Franchising and other operating arrangement in the lodging industry: A strategic comparison 

  18. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly Denton 41 1 94 2000 10.1177/001088040004100127 Implementing a balanced scorecard approach to managing hotel operation: The case of White Lodging Services 

  19. Macroeconomic Dynamics Diewert 15 4 537 2011 10.1017/S136510051000012X Capitalizing R&D expenditure 

  20. Evaluation Drew 17 4 383 2011 10.1177/1356389011421699 Using social network analysis to evaluate a complex policy network 

  21. Dunn 1994 Public policy analysis: An introduction 

  22. Eickelmann 253 2001 Information technology evaluation methods and management A comparative analysis of the balanced scorecard as applied in government and industry organizations 

  23. Evaluation Research Society Standards Committee 7 1982 Standards for evaluation practice Standards for program evaluation 

  24. American Journal of Evaluation Fetterman 28 2 179 2007 10.1177/1098214007301350 Empowerment evaluation: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow 

  25. Evaluation Georghiou 1 2 171 1995 10.1177/135638909500100204 Assessing the framework programmes: A meta-evaluation 

  26. Research Policy Georghiou 29 4-5 657 2000 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00094-3 Evaluating technology programs: Tools and methods 

  27. Research Evaluation Graham 21 5 354 2012 10.1093/reseval/rvs027 Evaluating health research impact: Development and implementation of the Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions impact framework 

  28. International Journal of Operations & Production Management Greatbanks 27 8 846 2007 10.1108/01443570710763804 The impact of balanced scorecards in a public sector environment: Empirical evidence from Dunedin City Council, New Zealand 

  29. Evaluation Greene 7 1 25 2001 10.1177/13563890122209504 The merits of mixing methods in evaluation 

  30. International Journal of Production Economics Haner 80 1 31 2002 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00240-2 Innovation quality-a conceptual framework 

  31. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management Harris 13 3 120 2001 10.1108/09596110110388909 Key performance indicator European hotel properties: General manager's choice and company profile 

  32. Iansiti 2004 The Keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, & sustainability 

  33. Jansen 29 2013 Business network management as a survival strategy: A tale of two software ecosystems 

  34. Journal of Marketing Jaworski 57 3 52 1993 10.2307/1251854 Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences 

  35. Kaplan 1999 The balanced scorecard for public-sector orgarnisations 

  36. Harvard Business Review Kaplan 70 71 1992 The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance 

  37. International Journal of Management Reviews Kerssens-van Drongelen 2 2 111 2000 10.1111/1468-2370.00034 Performance measurement in industrial R&D 

  38. ETRI Journal Kim 37 5 1044 2015 10.4218/etrij.15.0115.0059 Developing and evaluating new ICT innovation system: Case study of Korea's smart media industry 

  39. Omega Kim 30 1 19 2002 10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00049-4 An effective R&D performance measurement system: Survey of Korean R&D researchers 

  40. Oxford Review of Economic Policy Klein 13 4 29 1997 10.1093/oxrep/13.4.29 The risk premium for evaluating public projects 

  41. Social Psychology Quarterly Krackhardt 51 2 123 1988 10.2307/2786835 Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation 

  42. Industrial Management & Data Systems Leem 104 1 78 2004 10.1108/02635570410514115 A classification of mobile business models and its applications 

  43. Review of Industrial Organization Love 15 1 43 1999 10.1023/A:1007757110963 The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects 

  44. Evaluation and Program Planning Melkers 20 1 57 1997 10.1016/S0149-7189(96)00037-7 Politics and the political setting as an influence on evaluation activities: National research and technology policy programs in the United States and Canada 

  45. Scientometrics Meyer 51 1 163 2001 10.1023/A:1010572914033 Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology 

  46. American Journal of Evaluation Miller 27 3 296 2006 10.1177/109821400602700303 Taking stock of empowerment evaluation: An empirical review 

  47. Nachmias 1979 Public policy evaluation: Approaches and methods 

  48. Information & Management Motiwalla 42 5 651 2005 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.001 An intra- and inter-industry analysis of e-business effectiveness 

  49. International Journal of Public Sector Management Northcott 25 3 166 2012 10.1108/09513551211224234 Using the balanced scorecard to manage performance in public sector organizations: Issues and challenges 

  50. Olve 1999 Performance drivers: A practical guide to using the balanced scorecard 

  51. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation Osawa 14 2 93 2006 10.1080/19761597.2006.9668620 An empirical analysis of the valley of death: Large-scale R&D project performance in a Japanese diversified company 

  52. International Journal of Project Management Patanakul 34 3 452 2016 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.001 What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects? 

  53. International Journal of Project Management Pillai 20 2 165 2002 10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00056-9 Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment 

  54. Scott 1991 Social network analysis: A handbook 

  55. Sedera 1 2001 Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Conference on Information Systems A balanced scorecard approach to enterprise systems performance measurement 

  56. Research Evaluation Shishido 21 5 344 2012 10.1093/reseval/rvs029 Research on derivative effects created by Japanese national R&D projects 

  57. International Journal of Service Industry Management Silvestro 1 2 54 1990 10.1108/EUM0000000002803 Quality measurement in service 

  58. Stern 2005 Evaluation research methods 

  59. Public Policy and Administration Talbot 14 3 15 1999 10.1177/095207679901400302 Public performance - towards a new model? 

  60. Evaluation and Program Planning Tang 34 4 343 2011 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.04.002 Optimizing an immersion ESL curriculum using analytic hierarchy process 

  61. Evaluation and Program Planning Varmazyar 58 125 2016 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005 A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach 

  62. Wasserman 1994 Social network analysis: Methods and applications 

  63. Evaluation and Program Planning Wu 34 1 37 2011 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.001 Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard 

  64. R&D Management Zaidman 17 4 269 1987 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1987.tb00061.x Project evaluation: Externalities must not be disregarded 

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로