초록 ▼

A diagnostic system for controlling an engine low oil pressure indicator in a hybrid electric vehicle includes a powertrain having an engine and an electric traction motor, an oil pressure sensor/sending unit mechanically connected to the engine, an engine speed sensor/sending unit mechanically conn

A diagnostic system for controlling an engine low oil pressure indicator in a hybrid electric vehicle includes a powertrain having an engine and an electric traction motor, an oil pressure sensor/sending unit mechanically connected to the engine, an engine speed sensor/sending unit mechanically connected to the engine, a controller having connections to the oil pressure sensor and engine speed sensor, a low oil pressure indicator electrically connected to the controller, a mode selector having modes for "off" and "run/start", the controller being configured to prevent activation of the low oil pressure indicator when the mode selector is in the "run/start" mode and the engine is not running.

대표청구항 ▼

A diagnostic system for controlling an engine low oil pressure indicator in a hybrid electric vehicle includes a powertrain having an engine and an electric traction motor, an oil pressure sensor/sending unit mechanically connected to the engine, an engine speed sensor/sending unit mechanically conn

A diagnostic system for controlling an engine low oil pressure indicator in a hybrid electric vehicle includes a powertrain having an engine and an electric traction motor, an oil pressure sensor/sending unit mechanically connected to the engine, an engine speed sensor/sending unit mechanically connected to the engine, a controller having connections to the oil pressure sensor and engine speed sensor, a low oil pressure indicator electrically connected to the controller, a mode selector having modes for "off" and "run/start", the controller being configured to prevent activation of the low oil pressure indicator when the mode selector is in the "run/start" mode and the engine is not running. d, and the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part indicates that no features are currently suppressed; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to unsuppressed; it is determined that there are dependent features on derived parts whose primary exclusion status is suppressed and whose secondary exclusion status is combine-excluded; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to unsuppressed. 10. The system of claim 9 wherein the base part is a non-native part. 11. The system of claim 9 wherein the base part is a non-local part. 12. The system of claim 9 wherein the bridge node is created without modifying the base part. 13. The system of claim 9 wherein the determining comprises determining if the base part has been modified since the last time the host drawing was read. 14. The system of claim 9 wherein: the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part provides that one or more features on the base part are suppressed; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to suppressed; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to suppressed. 15. The system of claim 9 wherein: the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part provides that one or more features of the base part are versioned; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to versioned; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to versioned. 16. The system of claim 9 wherein: a current exclusion status of the bridge node indicates that features on the base part were formerly suppressed, and the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part indicates that no features are currently suppressed; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to unsuppressed; it is determined that there are dependent features on derived parts whose primary exclusion status is suppressed and whose secondary exclusion status is combine-excluded; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to unsuppressed. 17. The system of claim 9 wherein: a current exclusion status of the bridge node indicates that features on the base part were formerly versioned, and the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part indicates that no features are currently versioned; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to unsuppressed; it is determined that there are dependent features on derived parts whose primary exclusion status is versioned and whose secondary exclusion status is combine-excluded; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to unsuppressed. 18. The system of claim 9, the logic further comprising: determining if any databases represented by any bridge nodes have been unloaded from memory; and for all bridge nodes representing unloaded databases, suppressing all features connected to each bridge node via edge ordering connections, and their dependent features. 19. The method of claim 2 wherein: a current exclusion status of the bridge node indicates that features on the base part were formerly versioned, and the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part indicates that no features are currently versioned; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to unsuppressed; it is determined that there are dependent features on derived parts whose primary exclusion status is versioned and whose secondary exclusion status is combine-excluded; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to unsuppressed. 20. The method of claim 2 further comprising: determining if any databases represented by any bridge nodes have been unloaded from memory; and for all bridge nodes representing unloaded databases, suppressing all features connected to each bridge node via edge ordering connections, and their dependent features. 21. A computer-implemented graphics syste m, comprising: (a) a computer; and (b) a feature-based modeler, executed by the computer, having logic for: (1) creating a bridge node, wherein the bridge node maintains a reference to a base part and holds a derived part edge ordering; (2) determining when a drawing needs to updated; (3) determining a disjunctive exclusion status of the base part; (4) updating the exclusion status of the bridge node based on the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part; (5) updating the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts based on the exclusion status of the bridge node; and (6) updating the host drawing utilizing the exclusion status of the base part and the derived part. 22. An article of manufacture embodying logic for updating a drawing in a computer-implemented solid modeling system, the logic comprising: (a) creating a bridge node, wherein the bridge node maintains a reference to a base part and holds a derived part edge ordering; (b) determining when a drawing needs to updated; (c) determining a disjunctive exclusion status of the base part; (d) updating the exclusion status of the bridge node based on the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part; (e) updating the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts based on the exclusion status of the bridge node; and (f) updating the host drawing utilizing the exclusion status of the base part and the derived part. 23. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein the base part is a non-native part. 24. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein the base part is a non-local part. 25. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein the bridge node is created without modifying the base part. 26. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein the determining comprises determining if the base part has been modified since the last time the host drawing was read. 27. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein: the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part provides that one or more features on the base part are suppressed; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to suppressed; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to suppressed. 28. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein: the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part provides that one or more features on the base part are versioned; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to versioned; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to versioned. 29. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein: a current exclusion status of the bridge node indicates that features on the base part were formerly suppressed, and the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part indicates that no features are currently suppressed; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to unsuppressed; and it is determined that there are dependent features on derived parts whose primary exclusion status is suppressed and whose secondary exclusion status is combine-excluded; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to unsuppressed. 30. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein: a current exclusion status of the bridge node indicates that features on the base part were formerly versioned, and the disjunctive exclusion status of the base part indicates that no features are currently versioned; the exclusion status of the bridge node is updated to unsuppressed; it is determined that there are dependent features on derived parts whose primary exclusion status is versioned and whose secondary exclusion status is combine-excluded; and the exclusion status of dependent features on one or more derived parts is updated to unsuppressed. 31. The article of manufacture of claim 22, the logic further comprising: determining if any databases represented by any bridge nodes have been u