초록 ▼

A mechanism is provided that couples to a slide member of at least a two member slide forming a self-closing slide. The mechanism comprises a housing having a slot guiding an actuator. The actuator is spring coupled to the housing. The actuator engages a second slide member of the slide when the sec

A mechanism is provided that couples to a slide member of at least a two member slide forming a self-closing slide. The mechanism comprises a housing having a slot guiding an actuator. The actuator is spring coupled to the housing. The actuator engages a second slide member of the slide when the second slide member approaches a closed position. The spring generates a force for moving the actuator and the engaged second slide along the slot to a slide closed position.

대표청구항 ▼

A mechanism is provided that couples to a slide member of at least a two member slide forming a self-closing slide. The mechanism comprises a housing having a slot guiding an actuator. The actuator is spring coupled to the housing. The actuator engages a second slide member of the slide when the sec

A mechanism is provided that couples to a slide member of at least a two member slide forming a self-closing slide. The mechanism comprises a housing having a slot guiding an actuator. The actuator is spring coupled to the housing. The actuator engages a second slide member of the slide when the second slide member approaches a closed position. The spring generates a force for moving the actuator and the engaged second slide along the slot to a slide closed position. d round of game with said BANKER cards at said BANKER position, each of said players who invested in said respective TIE box wins against said Host in said round of game; (m) starting from said first action player, collecting said Investment of each of said players who loses against said Host in said round of game; and (n) starting from said first action player, paying to each of said players who wins against said Host in said round of game until said Capital is totally paid out, wherein when said Capital, starting from said first action player, is totally paid out for some of said players who win against said Host in said round of game, the rest of said players who win against said Host in said round of game are neither gain nor lose said investments thereof even though the rest of said players have lost said round of game. 2. The method, as recited in claim 1, wherein, in the step (p), a same amount of said Investment of each of said players who wins against said Host in said round of game is paid by said Host from said Capital until said Capital is totally paid out.3. The method, as recited in claim 2, in step (e), further providing a Side Bet boxes including an ODD box, an EVEN box, an ABOVE box, a BELOW box, and a plurality of POINT VALUE boxes, said ODD box representing point value of “1”, “3”, “5”, “7”, and “9”, said EVEN box representing point values of “0”, “2”, “4”, “6”, and “8”, said BELOW box representing point values of “0”, “1”, “2”, “3”, and “4”, said ABOVE box representing point values of “5”, “6”, “7”, “8”, and “9”, and said POINT VALUE boxes representing point values of “5”, “6”, “7”, “8”, and “9” respectively in such a manner that the step (l) further comprises a step of determining whether each of said players wins against said Host in said round of game, starting from said action player, by checking whether said players invested in said respective Side Bet boxes, wherein when said higher comparison point value of said round of game matches said point value in said respective Side Bet box in said round of game, each of said players who invested in said respective Side Bet box wins said round of game over said Host.4. The method, as recited in claim 3, wherein each of said players excluding said Host must invest said Investment at said BANKER box, PLAYER box, or TIE box before investing on said Side Bet boxes.5. The method, as recited in claim 3, wherein, in step (g), three cards of said deck are dealt to said BANKER position and another three cards of said deck are dealt to said PLAYER position, wherein said comparison value for each of said BANKER cards and said PLAYER cards is counted as a last digit of said total sum of points of each of said BANKER cards and PLAYER cards when said total sum of points is more than nine.6. The method, as recited in claim 5, wherein said deck of cards includes 36 cards, and wherein each deck of cards includes four sets of face value cards and four set of numerical value cards, wherein each set of said face cards includes an Ace card, a Jack card, a Queen card, and a King card, and each set of numerical value cards includes a 2 card, a 3 card, a 4 card, a 5 card, and a 6 card, a numerical value of each said numerical value cards counting as a point value thereof, said Ace card counting as a point value of “1”, and a numerical value of said Jack card, Queen card, and King card counting as a point value of “0”.7. The method, as recited in claim 6, wherein, in the step (d), said Host is selectively assigned from said players for two continuous rounds of game, and then another one of said players must be selected as said Host for next two continuous rounds of game.8. The method, as recited in claim 5, wherein said deck of cards includes 40 cards, and wherein each deck of cards includes four sets of face value cards and four set of numerical value cards, wherein each set of face cards includes an Ace card, a Jack card, a Queen card, and a King card, and each set of numerical value cards includes a 2 card, a 3 card, a 4 card, a 5 card, 6 card, and a 7 card, a numerical value of each said numerical value cards counting as a point value thereof, said Ace card counting as a point value of “1”, and a numerical value of said Jack card, Queen card, and King card counting as a point value of “0”.9. The method, as recited in claim 8, wherein, in the step (d), said Host is selectively assigned from said players for two continuous rounds of game, and then another one of said players must be selected as said Host for next two continuous rounds of game.10. The method, as recited in claim 3, wherein two cards of said deck are dealt to said BANKER position and another two cards of said deck are dealt to said PLAYER position, wherein said total sum of points for each of said BANKER cards and said PLAYER cards must be lesser than or equal to twenty-one.11. The method, as recited in claim 10, wherein said deck of cards includes 52 cards, and wherein each deck of cards includes four sets of face value cards and four set of numerical value cards, wherein each set of said face cards includes an Ace card, a Jack card, a Queen card, and a King card, and each set of numerical value cards includes a 2 card, a 3 card, a 4 card, a 5 card, a 6 card, 7 card, 8 card, and 9 card, a numerical value of each said numerical value cards counting as a point value thereof, said Ace card counting as a point value of “1” or “11”, and a numerical value of said Jack card, Queen card, and King card counting as a point value of “10”.12. The method, as recited in claim 10, wherein the step (g) further comprises the steps of: (g.1) dealing at least an additional first hitting card, having a point value, from said deck of cards to said PLAYER position until said total value of said PLAYER cards is equal to or above sixteen, and then summing up said total value of said PLAYER cards and said point value of said first hitting card to form said comparison point for said PLAYER cards; and (i.2) dealing at least an additional second hitting card, having a point value, from said deck of cards to said BANKER position when said total value of said BANKER cards is equal to or above sixteen, and then summing up said total value of said BANKER cards and said point value of said second hitting card to form said comparison point for said BANKER cards. 13. The method, as recited in claim 12, wherein, in step (d), said Host is selectively assigned from said players for two continuous rounds of game, and then another one of said players must be selected as said Host for next two continuous rounds of game.14. A method of playing a Super Baccarat card game, which comprises the steps of: (a) providing at least two players for said card game; (b) providing a BANKER box, a PLAYER box, and a TIE box for each of said players; (c) providing at least a deck of 36 cards, wherein each deck of cards comprises four sets of face value cards and four set of numerical value cards, wherein each set of said face cards includes an Ace card, a Jack card, a Queen card, and a King card, and each set of numerical value cards includes a 2 card, a 3 card, a 4 card, a 5 card, and a 6 card, a numerical value of each said numerical value cards counting as a point value thereof, said Ace card counting as a point value of “1”, and a numerical value of said Jack card, Queen card, and King card counting as a point value of “0”; (d) selecting a Host from said players; (e) investing a Capital by said Host and an Investment by each of said players other than said Host at said respective BANKER box, PLAYER box, or TIE box; (f) shuffling said deck of cards; (g) dealing three cards of said deck of cards to a BANKER position serving as three BANKER cards and dealing another three cards of said deck of cards to a PLAYER position serving as three PLAYER cards; (h) determining total values of said BANKE R cards and said PLAYER cards respectively by summing up points of each of said two BANKER cards and said two PLAYER cards respectively to form a total sum of points; (i) determining a comparison point value for each of said BANKER cards and said PLAYER cards based on said total point values of said BANKER cards and said P LAYER cards, wherein said comparison value for each of said BANKER cards and said PLAYER cards is counted as a last digit of said total sum of points of each of said BANKER cards and PLAYER cards when said total sum of points is more than nine; (j) comparing said comparison point values of said BANKER cards at said BANKER position and said PLAYER cards at said PLAYER position, wherein whichever said BANKER cards or said PLAYER cards has a higher comparison point wins said round of game, wherein when said comparison point value of said BANKER cards equals to said comparison point value of said PLAYER cards, said round of game is tie; (k) determining which of said players is a first action player to play against said Host by (k.1) determining an action number, which is said higher comparison point value of said two comparison point values of said BANKER cards and said PLAYER cards, and(k.2) determining said first action player by counting said action number among said players starting at said Host; (l) determining whether each of said players wins against said Host in said round of game, starting from said action player, by checking whether said players invested in said BANKER boxes or PLAYER boxes in front of said players, wherein when said BANKER cards at said BANKER position win said round of game over said PLAYER cards at said PLAYER position, each of said players who invested in said respective BANKER box wins against said Host in said round of game, wherein when said PLAYER cards at said PLAYER position win said round of game over said BANKER cards at said BANKER position, each of said players who invested in said respective PLAYER box wins against said Host in said round of game, wherein when said PLAYER cards at said PLAYER position tie said round of game with said BANKER cards at said BANKER position, each of said players who invested in said respective TIE box wins against said Host in said round of game; (m) starting from said first action player, collecting said Investment of each of said players who loses against said Host in said round of game; and (n) starting from said first action player, paying to each of said players who wins against said Host in said round of game until said Capital is totally paid out, wherein when said Capital, starting from said first action player, is totally paid out for some of said players who win against said Host in said round of game, the rest of said players who win against said Host in said round of game are neither gain nor lose said investments thereof even though the rest of said players have lost said round of game. 15. The method, as recited in claim 14, wherein, in the step (h), when said total value of either said BANKER cards or said PLAYER cards equals to 8 or 9, said total point value is counted as Natural comparison point and said BANKER cards or said PLAYER cards wins said round of game.16. The method, as recited in claim 15, wherein said deck of cards further includes at least a Joker card and each set of numerical value cards further includes a 7 card, wherein said Joker cards acts as a wild card that selectively represents a point value from 0 to 9 in such a manner that when a hand of each of said BANKER cards and said PLAYER cards consists of said Joker card, said total point value of said hand of said BANKER cards or said PLAYER cards counts as a natural comparison point value of “9” which is greater than said comparison point value “9” without said joker card.17. The method, as recited in claim 16, in the step (b) further providing a Side Bet boxes wherein each of said Side bet boxes represents at least a predetermined poi nt value and wherein, in the step (l), further comprises a step of determining whether each of said players wins against said Host in said round of game, starting from said action player, by checking whether said players invested in said respective Side Bet boxes, wherein when said higher comparison point value of said round of game matches said point value in said respective Side Bet box in said round of game, each of said players who invested in said respective Side Bet box wins said round of game over said Host.18. The method, as recited in claim 17, Wherein said Side Bet boxes includes an ODD box, an EVEN box, an ABOVE box, a BELOW box, and a plurality of POINT VALUE boxes, said ODD box representing point value of “1”, “3”, “5”, “7”, and “9”, said EVEN box representing point values of “0”, “2”, “4”, “6”, and “8”, said BELOW box representing point values of “0”, “1 ”, “2”, “3”, and “4”, said ABOVE box representing point values of “5”, “6”, “7”, “8”, and “9” and said POINT VALUE boxes representing point values of “0”, “1”, “2”, “3”, “4”, “5”, “6”, “7”, “8”, and “9” respectively.19. The method, as recited in claim 15, wherein said deck of cards further includes at least a Joker card and each set of numerical value cards further includes a 7 card, wherein said Joker cards acts as a wild card that selectively represents a point value either 1 or 7 in such a manner that when a hand of each of said BANKER cards and said PLAYER cards consists of said Joker card, said total point value of said hand of said BANKER cards or said PLAYER cards counts by summing up said point value of said Joker card and said point value of another two said BANKER cards or said PLAYER cards.20. The method, as recited in claim 19, in the step (b) further providing a Side Bet boxes wherein each of said Side bet boxes represents at least a predetermined point value and wherein, in the step (l), further comprises a step of determining whether each of said players wins against said Host in said round of game, starting from said action player, by checking whether said players invested in said respective Side Bet boxes, wherein when said higher comparison point value of said round of game matches said point value in said respective Side Bet box in said round of game, each of said players who invested in said respective Side Bet box wins said round of game over said Host.21. The method, as recited in claim 20, wherein said Side Bet boxes includes an ODD box, an EVEN box, an ABOVE box, a BELOW box, and a plurality of POINT VALUE boxes, said ODD box representing point value of “1”, “3”, “5”, “7”, and “9”, said EVEN box representing point values of “0”, “2”, “4”, “6”, and “8”, said BELOW box representing point values of “0”, “1”, “2”, “3”, and “4”, said ABOVE box representing point values of “5”, “6”, “7”, “8”, and “9” and said POINT VALUE boxes representing point values of “0”, “1”, “2”, “3”, “4”, “5”, “6”, “7”, “8”, and “9” respectively.22. The method, as recited in claim 15, in the step (b) further providing a Side Bet boxes wherein each of said Side bet boxes represents at least a predetermined point value and wherein, in the step (l), further comprises a step of determining whether each of said players wins against said Host in said round of game, starting from said action player, by checking whether said players invested in said respective Side Bet boxes, wherein when said higher comparison point value of said round of game matches said point value in said respective Side Bet box in said round of game, each of said players who invested in said respective Side Bet box wins said round of game over said Host.23. The method, as recited in claim 22, wherein said Side Bet boxes includes an ODD box, an EVEN box, an ABOVE box, a BELOW box, and a plurality of POINT VALUE boxes, said ODD box representing point value of “1”, “3”, “5”, “7”, and