초록 ▼

A method of detecting errors in air data sensing systems having multi-function probes being used in combinations to define probe systems includes a step (A) of, for each probe system, making a first prediction of an aircraft parameter as a function of local angles of attack at two member probes of t

A method of detecting errors in air data sensing systems having multi-function probes being used in combinations to define probe systems includes a step (A) of, for each probe system, making a first prediction of an aircraft parameter as a function of local angles of attack at two member probes of the particular system, and making a second prediction of the aircraft parameter as a function of local pressure ratios at the two member probes of the particular system. A step (B) is performed in which, for each of the probe systems, the first and second predictions of the aircraft parameter are compared to determine whether the first and second predictions are within a predetermined threshold of each other. Then, a step (C) is performed in which, for each of the probe systems, if the first and second predictions of the aircraft parameter are not within the predetermined threshold of each other, then the particular probe system is identified as having a malfunctioning member probe.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A method of detecting errors in air data sensing systems having a plurality of multi-function probes, the plurality of multi-function probes being used in combinations to define a plurality of probe systems each having at least two of the plurality of multi-function probes as members, the method

1. A method of detecting errors in air data sensing systems having a plurality of multi-function probes, the plurality of multi-function probes being used in combinations to define a plurality of probe systems each having at least two of the plurality of multi-function probes as members, the method comprising:(A) for each of the plurality of probe systems, making a first prediction of a first aircraft parameter as a function of local angles of attack at the at least two member probes of the particular system, and making a second prediction of the first aircraft parameter as a function of local pressure ratios at the at least two member probes of the particular system;(B) for each of the plurality of probe systems, comparing the first and second predictions of the first aircraft parameter to determine whether the first and second predictions are within a predetermined threshold of each other; and(C) for each of the plurality of probe systems, if the first and second predictions of the first aircraft parameter are not within a predetermined threshold of each other, then identifying the particular probe system as having a malfunctioning member probe. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein if in step (C) two of the plurality of probe systems are found to have a malfunctioning member probe, then further comprising step (D) of identifying as a malfunctioning probe a probe which is a member probe in each of the two probe systems found to have a malfunctioning member probe. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (A) for each of the plurality of probe systems, making the second prediction of the first aircraft parameter as a function of local pressure ratios at the at least two member probes of the particular system further comprises making the second prediction of the first aircraft parameter as a function of the pressure ratio Psl/qcl at each of the at least two member probes, wherein Psl is local static pressure and qcl is local impact pressure. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (A) for each of the plurality of probe systems, making the second prediction of the first aircraft parameter further comprises making the second prediction of the first aircraft parameter also as a function of a value of a second aircraft parameter. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein in step (A) for each of the plurality of probe systems, making the second prediction of the first aircraft parameter further comprises making the second prediction of the first aircraft parameter using an iterative method. 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the first aircraft parameter and the second aircraft parameter are respectively an aircraft angle of attack and an aircraft angle of sideslip. 7. The method of claim 4, wherein the first aircraft parameter and the second aircraft parameter are respectively an aircraft angle of sideslip and an aircraft angle of attack. 8. The method of claim 4, wherein the first aircraft parameter is one of an aircraft angle of attack and an aircraft angle of sideslip, and wherein the second aircraft parameter is an aircraft Mach number. 9. A multi-function probe configured to implement the method of claim 1.