Method and system for predicting performance of a drilling system of a given formation
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
E21B-047/00
E21B-044/00
출원번호
US-0177829
(2002-06-21)
발명자
/ 주소
Goldman,William A.
Matthews, III,Oliver
King,William W.
Weaver,Gary E.
Pruitt,Gerald L.
출원인 / 주소
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
대리인 / 주소
Baker Botts L.L.P.
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
67인용 특허 :
75
초록▼
A method and apparatus for predicting the performance of a drilling system for the drilling of a well bore in a given formation includes generating a geology characteristic of the formation per unit depth according to a prescribed geology model, obtaining specifications of proposed drilling equipmen
A method and apparatus for predicting the performance of a drilling system for the drilling of a well bore in a given formation includes generating a geology characteristic of the formation per unit depth according to a prescribed geology model, obtaining specifications of proposed drilling equipment for use in the drilling of the well bore, and predicting a drilling mechanics in response to the specifications as a function of the geology characteristic per unit depth according to a prescribed drilling mechanics model. Responsive to a predicted-drilling mechanics, a controller controls a parameter in the drilling of the well bore. The geology characteristic includes at least rock strength. The specifications include at least a bit specification of a recommended drill bit. Lastly, the predicted drilling mechanics include at least one of bit wear, mechanical efficiency, power, and operating parameters. A display is provided for generating a display of the geology characteristic and predicted drilling mechanics per unit depth, including either a display monitor or a printer.
대표청구항▼
What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus for predicting the performance of a drilling system comprising: first input device for receiving data representative of a geology characteristic of a formation per unit depth, the geology characteristic including at least rock strength; second input device for r
What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus for predicting the performance of a drilling system comprising: first input device for receiving data representative of a geology characteristic of a formation per unit depth, the geology characteristic including at least rock strength; second input device for receiving data representative of specifications of proposed drilling equipment of the drilling system for use in drilling a well bore in the formation, the specifications including at least a specification of a drill bit; processor operatively connected to said first and second input devices for determining a predicted drilling mechanics in response to the specifications data of the proposed drilling equipment as a function of the geology characteristic data per unit depth according to a drilling mechanics model and outputting data representative of the predicted drilling mechanics, the predicted drilling mechanics including at least one selected from the group consisting of bit wear, mechanical efficiency, power, and operating parameters, said processor further for outputting control parameter data responsive to the predicted drilling mechanics data, the control parameter data being adaptable for use in a recommended controlling of a control parameter in drilling of the well bore with the drilling system, the control parameter including at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, rpm, pump flow rate, and hydraulics; and third input device for receiving data representative of a real, time measurement parameter during the drilling of the well bore, the measurement parameter including at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, rpm, pump flow rate, and hydraulics, wherein said processor is further operatively connected to said third input device and configured for history matching the measurement parameter data with a back calculated value of the measurement parameter data, wherein the back calculated value of the measurement parameter data is a function of the drilling mechanics model and at least one control parameter, and wherein responsive to a prescribed deviation between the measurement parameter data and the back calculated value of the measurement parameter data, said processor is configured to perform at least one selected from the group consisting of a) adjust the drilling mechanics model, and b) modify control parameter data of a control parameter. 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein adjusting the drilling mechanics model includes modifying the model for at least one of the formation and the drilling system. 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein modifying control parameter data of a control parameter alters a recommended control of at least one drilling condition to improve a drilling performance of at least one component of the drilling system. 4. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a device operatively connected to said processor for providing an indication of potential bit performance. 5. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a controller responsive to the control parameter data for controlling the control parameter in the drilling of the well bore with the drilling system. 6. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a device responsive to at least one of the geology characteristic data and the predicted drilling mechanics data, the device configured to provide an indicator of a corresponding at least one of the geology characteristic and predicted drilling mechanics per unit depth. 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the geology characteristic includes at least one characteristic selected from the group consisting of rock strength, log data, lithology, porosity, and shale plasticity. 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the proposed drilling equipment specifications include at least one specification selected from the group consisting of a drill bit, drill string, down hole motor, top drive motor, rotary table assembly, mud system, and mud pump. 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the operating parameters include at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, rotary rpm (revolutions-per-minute), cost, rate of penetration, and torque. 10. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the indicator of the geology characteristic includes at least one graphical representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation, a percentage graph representation, and a band representation, and the indicator of the predicted drilling mechanics includes at least one graphical representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation, a percentage graph representation, and a band representation. 11. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein bit wear is determined as a function of cumulative work done according to a bit wear model and expressed in the form of at least one representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation and a percentage graph representation, wherein the curve representation of bit wear may include at least one representation selected from the group consisting of bit work expressed as specific energy level at the bit, cumulative work done by the bit, and optional work losses due to abrasivity, and the percentage graph representation is indicative of a bit wear condition at a given depth, further wherein the percentage graph of bit wear is coded, including a first code representative of expired bit life, and a second code representative of remaining bit life. 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein bit mechanical efficiency is determined as a function of a torque/weight-on-bit signature for the given bit according to a mechanical efficiency model and expressed in the form of at least one representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation and a percentage graph representation, wherein the curve representation of bit mechanical efficiency includes total torque and cutting torque at the bit, and the percentage graph representation of bit mechanical efficiency graphically illustrates total torque, total torque including cutting torque and frictional torque components, further wherein the percentage graph representation of bit mechanical efficiency is coded, including a first code for illustrating cutting torque, a second code for illustrating frictional unconstrained torque, and a third code for illustrating frictional constrained torque. 13. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein mechanical efficiency is further represented in the form of a percentage graph illustrating drilling system operating constraints that have an adverse impact upon mechanical efficiency, the drilling system operating constraints corresponding to constraints that result in an occurrence of frictional constrained torque, the percentage graph further for indicating a corresponding percentage of impact that each constraint has upon the frictional constrained torque component of the mechanical efficiency at a given depth, wherein the drilling system operating constraints can include maximum torque-on-bit (TOB), maximum weight-on-bit (WOB), minimum bit revolutions-per-minute (RPM), maximum bit revolutions-per-minute (RPM), maximum penetration rate (ROP), in any combination, and an unconstrained condition, further wherein the percentage graph representation of drilling system operating constraints on mechanical efficiency is coded, including different codes for identifying different constraints. 14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein power is expressed in the form of at least one representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation and a percentage graph representation, wherein the curve representation for power includes power limit and operating power level, the power limit corresponding to a maximum power to be applied to the bit and the operating power level including at least one of the following selected from the group consisting of constrained operating power level, recommended operating power level, and predicted operating power level, and the percentage graph representation of power illustrates drilling system operating constraints that have an adverse impact upon power, the drilling system operating constraints corresponding to those constraints that result in a power loss, the power constraint percentage graph further for indicating a corresponding percentage of impact that each constraint has upon the power at a given depth, further wherein the percentage graph representation of drilling system operating constraints on power is coded, including different codes for identifying different constraints. 15. The apparatus of claim 7, further comprising: a device configured to generate an indicator of the proposed drilling equipment details, in addition to at least one of the geology characteristic and predicted drilling mechanics, the proposed drilling equipment details including at least one recommended bit used in predicting the performance of the drilling system. 16. A computer implemented method for predicting the performance of a drilling system comprising: receiving data representative of a geology characteristic of a formation per unit depth, the geology characteristic including at least rock strength; receiving data representative of specifications of proposed drilling equipment of the drilling system for use in drilling a well bore in the formation, the specifications including at least a specification of a drill bit; determining a predicted drilling mechanics in response to the specifications data of the proposed drilling equipment as a function of the geology characteristic data per unit depth according to a drilling mechanics model and outputting data representative of the predicted drilling mechanics, the predicted drilling mechanics including at least one selected from the group consisting of bit wear, mechanical efficiency, power, and operating parameters; determining control parameter data in response to the predicted drilling mechanics data, the control parameter data being adaptable for use in a recommended controlling of a control parameter in drilling of the well bore with the drilling system, the control parameter including at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, rpm, pump flow rate, and hydraulics; receiving data representative of a real-time measurement parameter during the drilling of the well bore, the measurement parameter including at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, rpm, pump flow rate, and hydraulics; and history matching the measurement parameter data with a back calculated value of the measurement parameter data, wherein the back calculated value of the measurement parameter data is a function of at least one selected from the group consisting of the drilling mechanics model and at least one control parameter, and responsive to a prescribed deviation between the measurement parameter data and the back calculated value of the measurement parameter data, said determining step further for performing at least one selected from the group consisting of a) adjusting the drilling mechanics model and b) modifying control parameter data of a control parameter. 17. The method of claim 17, wherein adjusting the drilling mechanics model includes modifying the model for at least one of the formation and the drilling system. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein modifying control parameter data of the control parameter alters a recommended control of at least one drilling condition to improve a drilling performance of at least one component of the drilling system. 19. The method of claim 17, further comprising providing an indicator of potential bit performance based upon the predicted drilling mechanics. 20. The method of claim 17, further comprising: controlling the control parameter in the drilling of the well bore with the drilling system in response to the control parameter data. 21. The method of claim 17, wherein the geology characteristic includes at least one characteristic selected from the group consisting of rock strength, log data, lithology, porosity, and shale plasticity. 22. The method of claim 17, wherein the proposed drilling equipment specifications include at least one specification selected from the group consisting of a drill bit, drill string, down hole motor, top drive motor, rotary table assembly, mud system, and mud pump. 23. The method of claim 17, wherein the operating parameters include at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, bit rpm (revolutions-per-minute), cost, rate of penetration, and torque. 24. The method of claim 17, wherein the mechanical efficiency of the predicted drilling mechanics includes total torque, the total torque including cutting torque and frictional torque at the bit. 25. The method of claim 17, further comprising changing a drill bit from a first bit selection to a second bit selection in response to a change indictor based upon the predicted drilling mechanics. 26. The method of claim 17, further comprising: providing an indicator of at least one of the geology characteristic and predicted drilling mechanics per unit depth in response to a corresponding at least one of the geology characteristic data and the predicted drilling mechanics data. 27. The method of claim 28, wherein providing an indicator of the geology characteristic includes displaying at least one graphical representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation, a percentage graph representation, and a band representation, and providing an indicator of the predicted drilling mechanics includes displaying at least one graphical representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation, a percentage graph representation, and a band representation. 28. The method of claim 29, wherein bit wear is determined as a function of cumulative work done according to a bit wear model and expressed in the form of at least one representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation and a percentage graph representation, wherein the curve representation of bit wear includes at least one representation selected from the group consisting of bit work expressed as specific energy level at the bit, cumulative work done by the bit, and optional work losses due to abrasivity, and the percentage graph representation is indicative of a bit wear condition at a given depth, further wherein the percentage graph representation of bit wear is coded, including a first code representative of expired bit life, and a second code representative of remaining bit life. 29. The method of claim 28, wherein bit mechanical efficiency is determined as a function of a torque/weight-on-bit signature for the given bit according to a mechanical efficiency model and expressed in the form of at least one representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation and a percentage graph representation, wherein the curve representation of bit mechanical efficiency includes total torque and cutting torque at the bit, and the percentage graph representation of bit mechanical efficiency graphically illustrates total torque, total torque including cutting torque and frictional torque components, further wherein the percentage graph representation of bit mechanical efficiency is coded, including a first code for illustrating cutting torque, a second code for illustrating frictional unconstrained torque, and a third code for illustrating frictional constrained torque. 30. The method of claim 31, wherein mechanical efficiency is further represented in the form of a percentage graph illustrating drilling system operating constraints that have an adverse impact upon mechanical efficiency, the drilling system operating constraints corresponding to constraints that result in an occurrence of frictional constrained torque, the percentage graph further for indicating a corresponding percentage of impact that each constraint has upon the frictional constrained torque component of the mechanical efficiency at a given depth, wherein the drilling system operating constraints can include maximum torque-on-bit (TOB), maximum weight-on-bit (WOB), minimum bit revolutions-per-minute (RPM), maximum bit revolutions-per-minute (RPM), maximum penetration rate (ROP), in any combination, and an unconstrained condition, and the percentage graph representation of drilling system operating constraints on mechanical efficiency is coded, including different codes for identifying different constraints. 31. The method of claim 28, wherein power is expressed in the form of at least one representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation and a percentage graph representation, wherein the curve representation for power includes power limit and operating power level, the power limit corresponding to a maximum power to be applied to the bit and the operating power level including at least one of the following selected from the group consisting of constrained operating power level, recommended operating power level, and predicted operating power level, and the percentage graph representation of power illustrates drilling system operating constraints that have an adverse impact upon power, the drilling system operating constraints corresponding to those constraints that result in a power loss, the power constraint percentage graph further for indicating a corresponding percentage of impact that each constraint has upon the power at a given depth, further wherein the percentage graph representation of drilling system operating constraints on power is coded, including different codes for identifying different constraints. 32. The method of claim 28, further comprising: providing an indicator of proposed drilling equipment details, in addition to at least one of the geology characteristic and predicted drilling mechanics, the proposed drilling equipment details including at least one recommended bit used in predicting the performance of the drilling system. 33. A computer program stored on a computer-readable medium for execution by a computer for predicting the performance of a drilling system, said computer program comprising: instructions for receiving data representative of a geology characteristic of a formation per unit depth, the geology characteristic including at least rock strength; instructions for receiving data representative of specifications of proposed drilling equipment of the drilling system for use in drilling a well bore in the formation, the specifications including at least a specification of a drill bit; instructions for determining a predicted drilling mechanics in response to the specifications data of the proposed drilling equipment as a function of the geology characteristic per unit depth according to a drilling mechanics model and outputting data representative of the predicted drilling mechanics, the predicted drilling mechanics including at least one selected from the group consisting of bit wear, mechanical efficiency, power, and operating parameters; instructions for determining a control parameter data in response to the predicted drilling mechanics data, the control parameter data being adaptable for use in a recommended controlling of a control parameter in drilling of the well bore with the drilling system, the control parameter including at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, rpm, pump flow rate, and hydraulics; instructions for receiving data representative of a real-time measurement parameter during the drilling of the well bore, the measurement parameter including at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, rpm, pump flow rate, and hydraulics; and instructions for history matching the measurement parameter data with a back calculated value of the measurement parameter data, wherein the back calculated value of the measurement parameter data is a function of at least one selected from the group consisting of the drilling mechanics model and at least one control parameter, and said instructions for determining the control parameter data further including instructions, responsive to a prescribed deviation between the measurement parameter data and the back calculated value of the measurement parameter data, for performing at least one selected from the group consisting of a) adjusting the drilling mechanics model, b) modifying control parameter data of a control parameter, and c) initiating performance of an alarm operation. 34. The computer program of claim 33, wherein adjusting the drilling mechanics model includes modifying the model for at least one of the formation and the drilling system. 35. The computer program of claim 33, wherein modifying control parameter data of the control parameter alters a recommended control of at least one drilling condition to improve a drilling performance of at least one component of the drilling system. 36. The computer program of claim 33, further comprising instructions for providing an indicator of potential bit performance based upon the predicted drilling mechanics. 37. The computer program of claim 33, further comprising instructions for controlling the control parameter in the drilling of the well bore with the drilling system in response to the control parameter data. 38. The computer program of claim 33, wherein the proposed drilling equipment specifications include at least one specification selected from the group consisting of a drill bit, drill string, down hole motor, top drive motor, rotary table assembly, mud system, and mud pump. 39. The computer program of claim 33, wherein the operating parameters include at least one selected from the group consisting of weight-on-bit, bit rpm (revolutions-per-minute), cost, rate of penetration, and torque. 40. The computer program of claim 33, wherein the mechanical efficiency of the predicted drilling mechanics includes total torque, the total torque including cutting torque and frictional torque at the bit. 41. The computer program of claim 33, further comprising instructions for providing an indicator for changing a drill bit from a first bit selection to a second bit selection in response to a change indication based upon the predicted drilling mechanics. 42. The computer program of claim 33, further comprising: instructions for providing an indicator of at least one of the geology characteristic and predicted drilling mechanics per unit depth in response to a corresponding at least one of the geology characteristic data and the predicted drilling mechanics data. 43. The computer program of claim 42, wherein providing the indicator of the geology characteristic includes displaying at least one graphical representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation, a percentage graph representation, and a band representation, and providing the indicator of the predicted drilling mechanics includes displaying at least one graphical representation selected from the group consisting of a curve representation, a percentage graph representation, and a band representation.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (75)
Grimshaw Kenneth P. (Christchurch NZX), Adaptive control of a dynamic system or process.
Kevin L. Alft ; Fred G. Delonti ; Christopher Dean Rettig ; Paul A. Cartwright, Automated bore planning method and apparatus for horizontal directional drilling.
Dahlem James Steven ; Riederer Paul Ronald,GBX ; Cuillier Bruno,FRX, Cascade method and apparatus for providing engineered solutions for a well programming process.
Paske William C. (Missouri City TX) Rodney Paul F. (Spring TX) Ormsby Ronald D. (Houston TX), Drill bit and other downhole tools having electro-negative surfaces and sacrificial anodes to reduce mud balling.
Cornett Rickey R. (Dobson NC) Walsh R. Victor (Winston-Salem NC) Willard Ronald S. (Winston-Salem NC) Johnston Michael Z. (Kernersville NC) Saluta Jaime P. (Winston-Salem NC) Tylak Daniel J. (Lewisvi, Intelligent computer integrated maintenance system and method.
Zhilikov Valentin V. (poselok Malakhovka ; Bykovskoe shosse ; 35 ; kv. 5 Moskovskaya oblast SUX) Motsokhein Boris I. (B.Cherkizovskaya ulitsa ; 9 ; korpus I ; kv. I52 Moscow SUX) Parfenov Boris M. (B, Method and apparatus for controlling drilling process.
Tabanou Jacques R. (Houston TX) Antoine J. N. (Vaux-Le-Penil FRX), Method and apparatus for detecting and quantifying hydrocarbon bearing laminated reservoirs on a workstation.
Cooley Craig Hodges ; Curry David Alexander,GBX ; Ledgerwood ; III Leroy William, Method and apparatus for determining potential for drill bit performance.
Goldman William A. ; Smith Lee Morgan ; Mathews ; III Oliver ; Arab Kambiz ; King William W. ; Murrell Kelley M. ; Weaver Gary E., Method and system for predicting performance of a drilling system for a given formation.
William A. Goldman ; Oliver Matthews, III ; William W. King ; Gary E. Weaver ; Gerald L. Pruitt, Method and system for predicting performance of a drilling system for a given formation.
Bible Matthew (Houston TX) Lesage Marc (Missouri City TX) Falconer Ian (The Meadows TX), Method for detecting drilling events from measurement while drilling sensors.
Holbrook Phil (Houston TX) Robertson Homer A. (Woodlands TX) Hauck Michael L. (Houston TX), Method for determining pore pressure and horizontal effective stress from overburden and effective vertical stresses.
David P. Moran ; James A. Robertson, Method for determining preferred drill bit design parameters and drilling parameters using a trained artificial neural network, and methods for training the artificial neural network.
Wiener Jacky M. (Englewood CO) Moll Robert F. (Englewood CO) Rogers John A. (Castle Rock CO), Method for estimating formation permeability from wireline logs using neural networks.
King Charles H. ; Pinckard Mitchell D. ; Krishnamoorthy Kalimuthu ; Benton Denise F., Method of and system for optimizing rate of penetration in drilling operations.
Millheim Keith K. (Tulsa OK) Mount ; II Houston B. (Tulsa OK) Rai Chandra S. (Tulsa OK) Sondergeld Carl H. (Broken Arrow OK), Method of exploration for hydrocarbons.
Steiger Ronald P. (Houston TX) Leung Peter K. (Sugar Land TX), Methods for determining in situ shale strengths, elastic properties, pore pressures, formation stresses, and drilling fl.
Case Charles (West Redding CT) Watson Charles (Danbury CT) Lawrence Richard (Stormville NY), Sensitivity function technique for modeling nuclear tools.
Huang, Sujian, Simulating the dynamic response of a drilling tool assembly and its application to drilling tool assembly design optimization and drilling performance optimization.
Veeningen, Daan; Givens, Kris, Method and apparatus and program storage device adapted for automatic qualitative and quantitative risk assessment based on technical wellbore design and earth properties.
Veeningen, Daan; Givens, Kris, Method and apparatus and program storage device adapted for visualization of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment based on technical wellbore design and earth properties.
Goldman,William A.; Matthews, III,Oliver; King,William W.; Weaver,Gary E.; Pruitt,Gerald L., Method and system for predicting performance of a drilling system for a given formation.
Goldman,William A.; Matthews, III,Oliver; King,William W.; Weaver,Gary E.; Pruitt,Gerald L., Method and system for predicting performance of a drilling system for a given formation.
Yeten, Burak; Castellini, Alexandre, Method for history matching and uncertainty quantification assisted by global optimization techniques utilizing proxies.
Calhoun,William Malcolm; Caicedo,Hector Ulpiano; Ewy,Russell Thomas, Method for predicting rate of penetration using bit-specific coefficient of sliding friction and mechanical efficiency as a function of confined compressive strength.
Calhoun, William Malcolm; Caicedo, Hector Ulpiano; Ewy, Russell Thomas, Method for predicting rate of penetration using bit-specific coefficients of sliding friction and mechanical efficiency as a function of confined compressive strength.
Marx, Trent; Reid, Gary William; Leung, Henry; Liu, Xiaoxiang, Methods and systems for improved drilling operations using real-time and historical drilling data.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.