초록 ▼

A process control system for controlling at least one process actuator includes a first process model for driving at least one process actuator in such a manner that at least one process desired manipulating variable is generated for driving at least one process actuator; a second process model, whi

A process control system for controlling at least one process actuator includes a first process model for driving at least one process actuator in such a manner that at least one process desired manipulating variable is generated for driving at least one process actuator; a second process model, which generates a process actual variable from at least one process actual manipulating variable of the at least one process actuator; and another process element for generating a comparison process actual variable. The first process model can be mapped by inverting the second process model, and a process actual variable difference, which is formed from a process actual variable and a comparison process actual variable, is fed via a control unit to the first and second process models. The process element is designed as a third process model with higher reproduction precision and includes at least one non-invertible process component.

대표청구항 ▼

What is claimed is: 1. A process control system for controlling at least one process actuator, the process control system comprising: a first process model for driving the at least one process actuator in such a manner that, from at least one process desired variable fed to the first process model,

What is claimed is: 1. A process control system for controlling at least one process actuator, the process control system comprising: a first process model for driving the at least one process actuator in such a manner that, from at least one process desired variable fed to the first process model, at least one process desired manipulating variable is generated for driving the at least one process actuator; a second process model which generates a process actual variable from at least one process actual manipulating variable of the at least one process actuator; and a process element for generating a comparison process actual variable; wherein the first process model can be mapped by inverting the second process model; wherein a process actual variable difference which is formed from the process actual variable and the comparison process actual variable is fed via a control unit to the first and the second process model; and wherein the process element is configured as a third process model with higher process reproduction precision than the first and second process models, and includes at least one non-invertible process component. 2. The process control system, as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: a measuring device configured to measure the comparison process actual variable, whereby an additional process actual variable difference formed from the measured comparison process actual variable and the comparison process actual variable and determined via the third process model is fed via another control unit to the third process model. 3. The process control system, as claimed in claim 2, wherein the third process model comprises a plurality of individual process submodels including an air filter model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of an air filter unit, a throttle flap model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of a throttle flap arrangement, a suction pipe container model for reproducing pressure ratios inside a suction pipe and an intake valve model for reproducing an intake valve air mass flow in an area of an intake valve arrangement. 4. The process control system, as claimed in claim 1, wherein the third process model comprises a plurality of individual process submodels including an air filter model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of an air filter unit, a throttle flap model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of a throttle flap arrangement, a suction pipe container model for reproducing pressure ratios inside a suction pipe and an intake valve model for reproducing an intake valve air mass flow in an area of an intake valve arrangement. 5. The process control system, as claimed in claim 4, wherein the throttle flap model generates the air mass flow in the area of the throttle flap arrangement based on determined variables of at least a current pressure ratio over the throttle flap and an associated throttle flap angle. 6. The process control system, as claimed in claim 5, wherein the intake valve model generates the air mass flow in the area of the intake valve based on determined variables of at least a suction pipe pressure, an exhaust gas counter pressure, an actual value of an intake valve lift, an actual value of an intake timing and an actual value of the exhaust timing. 7. The process control system, as claimed in claim 4, wherein the intake valve model generates the air mass flow in the area of the intake valve based on determined variables of at least a suction pipe pressure, an exhaust gas counter pressure, an actual value of an intake valve lift, an actual value of an intake timing and an actual value of the exhaust timing. 8. The process control system, as claimed in claim 7, wherein the intake valve model for generating the air mass flow in the area of the intake valve comprises nonlinear absorption characteristics. 9. A method for controlling at least one process actuator, comprising the acts of: generating at least one process desired manipulating variable from at least one process desired variable fed into a first process model; driving the at least one process actuator, based on the at least one process desired manipulating variable; generating, in a second process model, a process actual variable from at least one process actual manipulating variable of the at least one process actuator; generating a comparison process actual variable in a process element; mapping the first process model by inverting the second process model; and inputting, via a control unit, a process actual variable difference which is formed from the process actual variable and the comparison process actual variable, to the first and second process models; wherein the process element is configured as a third process model with higher process reproduction precision than the first and second process models, and includes at least one non-invertible process component. 10. The method as claimed in claim 9, further comprising the acts of: measuring the comparison process actual variable; and inputting to the third process model, via another control unit, an additional process actual variable difference formed from the measured comparison process actual variable and the comparison process actual variable and determined via the third process model. 11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the third process model comprises a plurality of individual process submodels including an air filter model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of an air filter unit, a throttle flap model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of a throttle flap arrangement, a suction pipe container model for reproducing pressure ratios inside a suction pipe and an intake valve model for reproducing an intake valve air mass flow in an area of an intake valve arrangement. 12. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the third process model comprises a plurality of individual process submodels including an air filter model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of an air filter unit, a throttle flap model for reproducing an air mass flow in an area of a throttle flap arrangement, a suction pipe container model for reproducing pressure ratios inside a suction pipe and an intake valve model for reproducing an intake valve air mass flow in an area of an intake valve arrangement. 13. The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the throttle flap model generates the air mass flow in the area of the throttle flap arrangement based on using determined variables of at least a current pressure ratio over the throttle flap and an associated throttle flap angle. 14. The method as claimed in claim 12, futher comprising the act of: measuring the comparison process actual variable; and inputting to the third process model, via another control unit, an additional process actual variable difference formed from the measured comparison process actual variable and the comparison process actual variable and determined via the process model. 15. The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the intake valve model generates the air mass flow in the area of the intake valve using determined variables of at least a suction pipe pressure, an exhaust gas counter pressure, an actual value of an intake valve lift, an actual value of an intake timing and an actual value of the exhaust timing. 16. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the intake valve model for generating the air mass flow in the area of the intake valve comprises nonlinear absorption characteristics.