Method and system for data fusion using spatial and temporal diversity between sensors
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G01S-007/02
G01S-007/48
G01S-013/86
G01S-013/00
G06F-017/40
출원번호
UP-0129395
(2005-05-16)
등록번호
US-7576681
(2009-08-31)
발명자
/ 주소
Chen, Hai Wen
Olson, Teresa L.
출원인 / 주소
Lockheed Martin Corporation
대리인 / 주소
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
9인용 특허 :
24
초록▼
A method and system provide a multi-sensor data fusion system capable of adaptively weighting the contributions from each one of a plurality of sensors using a plurality of data fusion methods. During a predetermined tracking period, the system receives data from each individual sensor and each data
A method and system provide a multi-sensor data fusion system capable of adaptively weighting the contributions from each one of a plurality of sensors using a plurality of data fusion methods. During a predetermined tracking period, the system receives data from each individual sensor and each data fusion method is performed to determine a plurality of reliability functions for the system based on combining each sensor reliability function which are individually weighted based on the S/N (signal-to-noise) ratio for the received data from each sensor, and a comparison of predetermined sensor operation characteristics for each sensor and a best performing (most reliable) sensor. The system may dynamically select to use one or a predetermined combination of the generated reliability functions as the current (best) reliability function which provides a confidence level for the multi-sensor system relating to the correct classification (recognition) of targets and decoys.
대표청구항▼
What is claimed is: 1. A method for integrating data received from a plurality of sensors, comprising: receiving data from a plurality of sensors having overlapping scanning areas; determining a plurality of reliability functions for the plurality of sensors, the plurality of reliability functions
What is claimed is: 1. A method for integrating data received from a plurality of sensors, comprising: receiving data from a plurality of sensors having overlapping scanning areas; determining a plurality of reliability functions for the plurality of sensors, the plurality of reliability functions being based upon individually weighted reliability functions for each sensor; selecting one or a predetermined combination of said plurality of reliability functions as a current reliability function based on the selected one or predetermined combination satisfying predetermined thresholds; and based upon data from the sensors and at least one selected reliability function, determining whether or not there is an object of interest within the overlapping scanning areas. 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the individually weighted reliability functions are based upon the relative received operating characteristics between each sensor. 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining to delay said selecting for a predetermined time period based on said selected at least one failing to satisfy said predetermined threshold. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said plurality of reliability functions from using one of a predetermined additive, multiplicative, and fuzzy logic calculation combing each sensor reliability function. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said individual weighting based on a predetermined parameter for the plurality of sensors satisfying a predetermined threshold, and determining said plurality of reliability functions, based on using said plurality of predetermined calculations for a single sensor reliability function, when said predetermined parameter fails to satisfy said predetermined threshold. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said plurality of reliability functions based on differences between probabilities of classification for each sensor as compared to a single sensor having the highest probability of classification. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of sensors includes at least one of a laser, IR (infrared), and RF (radio frequency) sensor. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said plurality of reliability functions based on determining a single sensor, as compared to the plurality of sensors, as having the best performance for at least one predetermined sensor parameter. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein said at least one predetermined sensor parameter is selected from the group comprising operating characteristics of said single sensor and S/N ratio for said single sensor. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein said single sensor is one of a laser, IR, and RF sensor. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said selecting includes selecting said current reliability function to increase the probability of classifying one of a target and decoy above a predetermined threshold. 12. A method according to claim 1, wherein the overlapping scanning areas form a search area within which the object of interest is located. 13. A method for integrating data received from a plurality of sensors, comprising: receiving data from a plurality of sensors; determining a plurality of reliability functions for the plurality of sensors, the plurality of reliability functions being based upon individually weighted reliability functions for each sensor; and selecting one or a predetermined combination of said plurality of reliability functions as a current reliability function based on the selected one or predetermined combination satisfying predetermined thresholds; wherein said determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said plurality of reliability functions from using one of a predetermined additive, multiplicative, and fuzzy logic calculation combing each sensor reliability function; and wherein said determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining empty sets and ignorance sets for the received data from the plurality of sensors based on said predetermined multiplicative calculation. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said predetermined multiplicative calculation includes a Dempster-Shafer data fusion method. 15. A method according to claim 13, wherein each sensor includes an overlapping scanning area and the overlapping scanning areas form a search area within which the object of interest is located. 16. A method for integrating data received from a plurality of sensors, comprising: receiving data from a plurality of sensors; determining a plurality of reliability functions for the plurality of sensors, the plurality of reliability functions being based upon individually weighted reliability functions for each sensor; and selecting one or a predetermined combination of said plurality of reliability functions as a current reliability function based on the selected one or predetermined combination satisfying predetermined thresholds; wherein said determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said individual weighting based on a predetermined parameter for the plurality of sensors satisfying a predetermined threshold, and determining said plurality of reliability functions, based on using said plurality of predetermined calculations for a single sensor reliability function, when said predetermined parameter fails to satisfy said predetermined threshold; wherein said predetermined parameter is a false alarm rate for the plurality of sensors. 17. A method according to claim 16, wherein each sensor includes an overlapping scanning area and the overlapping scanning areas form a search area within which the object of interest is located. 18. A multi-sensor system, comprising: a plurality of sensors for receiving data having overlapping scanning areas; and at least one controller for performing the steps of: determining a plurality of reliability functions for the plurality of sensors, the plurality of reliability functions being based upon individually weighted reliability functions for each sensor; selecting one or a predetermined combination of said plurality of reliability functions as a current reliability function based on the selected at least one satisfying a predetermined threshold; and based upon data from the sensors and at least one selected reliability function, determining whether or not there is an object of interest within the overlapping scanning areas. 19. The system of claim 18, wherein said controller to determine said individual weighting based on a predetermined parameter for the plurality of sensors satisfying a predetermined threshold, and said controller to determine said plurality of reliability functions, based on using said plurality of predetermined calculations for a single sensor reliability function, when said predetermined parameter fails to satisfy said predetermined threshold. 20. The system of claim 18, wherein said plurality of sensors includes at least one of a laser, IR (infrared) sensor, and RF (radio frequency) sensor. 21. A system according to claim 18, wherein the overlapping scanning areas form a search area within which the object of interest is located. 22. A method for integrating data received from a plurality of sensors, comprising: receiving data from a plurality of sensors; determining a S/N (signal-to-noise) ratio for each sensor based on signal measurements of the received data; determining a plurality of reliability functions for the plurality of sensors, the plurality of reliability functions being based upon individually weighted reliability functions for each sensor; and selecting one or a predetermined combination of said plurality of reliability functions as a current reliability function based on the selected one or predetermined combination satisfying predetermined thresholds; wherein said controller to determine said individual weighting based on a predetermined parameter for the plurality of sensors satisfying a predetermined threshold, and said controller to determine said plurality of reliability functions, based on using said plurality of predetermined calculations for a single sensor reliability function, when said predetermined parameter fails to satisfy said predetermined threshold; wherein said predetermined parameter is a false alarm rate for the plurality of sensors. 23. A method according to claim 22, wherein each sensor includes an overlapping scanning area and the overlapping scanning areas form a search area within which the object of interest is located. 24. A computer program product comprising a machine-readable medium having stored thereon a plurality of executable instructions for causing a processor to carry out the operation of: receiving data from a plurality of sensors having overlapping scanning areas; determining a plurality of reliability functions for the plurality of sensors, the plurality of reliability functions being based upon individually weighted reliability functions for each sensor; and selecting at least one or a predetermined combination of said plurality of reliability functions to use as a current reliability function based on the selected at least one satisfying a predetermined threshold; and based upon data from the sensors and at least one selected reliability function, determining whether or not there is an object of interest within the overlapping scanning areas. 25. The computer program product of claim 24, wherein determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said individual weighting based on a predetermined parameter for the plurality of sensors satisfying a predetermined threshold. 26. The computer program product of claim 24, wherein determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said plurality of reliability functions based on differences between probabilities of classification for each sensor as compared to a single sensor having the highest probability of classification. 27. The computer program product of claim 24, wherein determining a plurality of reliability functions includes determining said plurality of reliability functions from using one of a predetermined additive, multiplicative, and fuzzy logic calculation combining each sensor reliability function. 28. The computer program product of claim 24, wherein selecting at least one or a predetermined combination of said plurality of reliability functions includes selecting said current reliability function to increase the probability of classifying the object of interest, which corresponds to either a target or a decoy. 29. The computer program product according to claim 24, wherein the overlapping scanning areas form a search area within which the object of interest is located.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (24)
Linsenmayer Glenn R. (Reston VA), Communication adaptive multi-sensor system.
Kahn Twassul A. (Cypress TX) Kiowski John W. (Houston TX) Lang Douglas G. (Bellaire TX), Method and apparatus for obtaining a composite field response to a variable source array using weighting coefficients.
Audouin, Olivier; Manzanedo, Maria; Noirie, Ludovic; Penninckx, Denis; Benveniste, Albert; Cerou, Frederic; Moustakides, George, Method of measuring the error rate of an optical transmission system and apparatus for implementing the method.
Butler Millard T. (Albuquerque NM) Cave Steven P. (Albuquerque NM) Creager James D. (Albuquerque NM) Johnson Charles M. (Albuquerque NM) Mathes John B. (Albuquerque NM) Smith Kirk J. (Albuquerque NM), Minefield reconnaissance and detector system.
Flament Bruno (Grenoble FRX) Blanpain Roland (Entre-Deux-Guiers FRX), Process and apparatus for extracting a useful signal having a finite spatial extension at all times and which is variabl.
Maren Alianna J. ; Akita Richard M. ; Colbert Bradley D. ; Donovan David J. ; Glover Charles W. ; Mathia Karl ; Pap Robert M. ; Priddy Kevin L. ; Robinson Timothy W. ; Saeks Richard E., Sensor fusion apparatus and method.
Tgavalekos, Nora T.; Scannell, Brian J.; Begin, Elizabeth M.; Adams, George C.; Rosenthal, Samuel H.; Gittler, Seanna J.; Scheid, Eric; Johnson, Arthur B.; Nelson, Kenric P., Determining confidence of object identification.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.