System and process for gathering, recording and validating requirements for computer applications
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G06F-003/048
G06F-003/023
출원번호
UP-0484541
(2002-07-26)
등록번호
US-7861158
(2011-02-24)
국제출원번호
PCT/US2002/023816
(2002-07-26)
§371/§102 date
20040122
(20040122)
국제공개번호
WO03/010684
(2003-02-06)
발명자
/ 주소
Martin, Maurice
Brickley, Stephen
Amdour, Leon
Kravets, Alex
Fan, Brian
Infante, Dominic
Larking, Stuart
Aldama, Paul
출원인 / 주소
IRISE
대리인 / 주소
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
28인용 특허 :
83
초록▼
The system includes a novel software application interactive representation modeling language, a software application (82) operative to use the modeling language to create, read and modify interactive representation models of the proposed applications, a memory (86) to store requirement data and int
The system includes a novel software application interactive representation modeling language, a software application (82) operative to use the modeling language to create, read and modify interactive representation models of the proposed applications, a memory (86) to store requirement data and interactive representation model data, a software application (92) operative to read and update the interactive representation model data across a computer network, a software application (76) operative to maintain a record of the requirements and to administer operation of the system, a software application (78) operative to render interactive representations of the proposed applications in browser readable format, a software application (82) operative to allow multiple instances of other applications to access interactive representation data and requirement data residing in the memory and a software application (84) operative to allow an individual user's interactions with the system to be broadcast across a networked system to other users.
대표청구항▼
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for collecting and validating requirements for a proposed computer application, comprising: creating a plurality of simulated pages for the proposed computer application at least partly in response to user actions; receiving a plurality of requirements for the
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for collecting and validating requirements for a proposed computer application, comprising: creating a plurality of simulated pages for the proposed computer application at least partly in response to user actions; receiving a plurality of requirements for the proposed computer application wherein the plurality of requirements are configured to communicate to a designer or developer an intended behavior of the proposed computer application; creating a plurality of user interface components for the proposed computer application; in response to at least a first user action, associating one or more requirements with at least one of the simulated pages or user interface components to form a plurality of user interface component requirement associations; and displaying on a computer screen in a computer viewable document; the simulated pages; the user interface components appearing on the simulated pages; the requirements associated with the simulated pages; and the requirements associated with the user interface components, wherein review of the computer viewable document, including displayed simulated pages and displayed requirements associated with the simulated pages, and including displayed user interface components and displayed requirements associated with the user interface components, enables a user to validate the requirements for the proposed computer application. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising identifying a user interface component requirement association by assigning a number to a requirement associated with the first simulated page and assigning a matching number to an associated user interface component. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the computer viewable document is an HTML page. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the simulated pages are interactive. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the simulated pages simulate screen navigation available in the proposed computer application. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the simulated pages simulate computation available in the proposed computer application. 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the simulated pages simulate storage and retrieval available in the proposed computer application. 8. The method of claim 1 further including storing the requirements, the simulated pages, the user interface components and the associations in a single, electronic system of record. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the computer viewable document corresponds to a single computer viewable document. 10. A computer system that simulates and validates behavior for a proposed computer application, the computer system comprising: a first component configured to interact with user actions, wherein the first component is further configured to create a plurality of simulated pages for the proposed computer application at least partly in response to the user actions; a second component configured to receive a plurality of requirements for the proposed computer application; a third component configured to create a plurality of user interface components for the proposed computer application; a fourth component configured to respond to at least a first user action and to associate one or more requirements with at least one of the simulated pages or user interface components to form a plurality of user interface component requirement associations in response to the first user action; and a fifth component configured to generate a display of a computer viewable document, wherein the computer viewable document comprises: the simulated pages; the user interface components appearing on the simulated pages; the requirements associated with the simulated pages; and the requirements associated with the user interface components, wherein review of the computer viewable document enables a user to determine whether said requirements are valid statements of the needs and desires for the proposed computer application. 11. The computer system of claim 10, wherein the fourth component is further configured to identify a user interface component requirement association by assigning a number to a requirement associated with the first simulated page and assigning a matching number to an associated user interface component. 12. The computer system of claim 10, wherein the computer viewable document is an HTML page. 13. The computer system of claim 10, wherein the simulated pages are interactive. 14. The computer system of claim 10, wherein the simulated pages simulate screen navigation available in the proposed computer application. 15. The computer system of claim 10, wherein the simulated pages simulate computation available in the proposed computer application. 16. The computer system of claim 10, wherein the simulated pages simulate storage and retrieval available in the proposed computer application. 17. The computer system of claim 10, further comprising a component configured to store the requirements, the simulated pages, the user interface components, and the associations in a single electronic system of record. 18. The computer system of claim 10, wherein the computer viewable document corresponds to a single computer viewable document. 19. A method of simulating a computer application that is to be developed and validating requirements for the computer application, the method comprising: displaying on a computer display an interactive simulation area comprising one or more user interface components; displaying on the computer display a requirements area comprising one or more requirements, wherein at least one of the requirements is configured to communicate to a designer or developer an intended behavior of the proposed computer application; and associating the one or more user interface components with the one or more requirements such that a user interface component displayed in the simulation area is visually associated with a displayed requirement of the requirements area. 20. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising displaying an association between a user interface component and a displayed requirement by performing at least one of: displaying on the computer display an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the user interface component; or displaying on the computer display the identifier in the requirements area approximately adjacent to the associated requirement. 21. The method as defined in claim 20, wherein the identifier is automatically assigned by a simulation application. 22. The method as defined in claim 21, wherein the identifier corresponds to an automatically assigned cross reference number. 23. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein the interactive simulation area and the requirements area are displayed together, and wherein manipulation of a scrollbar by a user changes a viewable area including at least a first view and a second view, such that in the first view, the interactive simulation area is visible, and in the second view, the requirements area is visible. 24. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising displaying the interactive simulation area, displaying the requirements area, and associating the one or more user interface components with the one or more requirements using a computer program with a consistent user interface. 25. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising automatically generating hypertext markup language (HTML) code corresponding to content for at least one of the simulation area or the requirements area. 26. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein the interactive simulation area and the requirements area are displayed together, and further comprising changing from displaying the interactive simulation area and displaying the requirements area to displaying the interactive simulation area but not the requirements area at least partly in response to a user actuating a control. 27. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising displaying an “add requirement” area configured to permit a user to add a requirement and associate the requirement with a selected user interface component of the interactive simulation area. 28. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising: displaying on the computer display an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the user interface component; monitoring a position of a cursor manipulated by a pointing device, wherein the cursor is determined to be adjacent the identifier in the interactive simulation area; and at least partly in response to receiving an indication of a selection of an identifier displayed in the interactive simulation area from the pointing device, selecting for display a requirement corresponding to the identifier in the requirements area. 29. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising: displaying on the computer display an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the user interface component; monitoring a position of a cursor manipulated by a pointing device, wherein the cursor is determined to be adjacent the identifier in the interactive simulation area; and at least partly in response to receiving an indication of a selection of an identifier displayed in the interactive simulation area from the pointing device: receiving one or more attributes to form a requirement for the requirements area; and associating the requirement with the identifier. 30. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein the one or more requirements corresponds to one or more statements or to one or more portions of a statement regarding a desired behavior of the computer application that is to be developed. 31. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a page. 32. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a form. 33. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a dynamic table, which accepts user inputs for simulated functioning of the computer application to be developed. 34. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a text input primitive. 35. The method as defined in claim 19, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a button. 36. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising at least one component that simulates computation available in a computer application. 37. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising at least one component that simulates storage and retrieval available in a computer application. 38. The method as defined in claim 19, further comprising: selecting user interface components to be described in a report; including an image corresponding to the selected user interface components in the report; selectively retrieving requirements corresponding to the selected user interface components; and including the selectively retrieved requirements in the report. 39. The method as defined in claim 38, wherein the report further comprises a summarization of control flow connections that originate from primitives of the selected user interface components. 40. The method as defined in claim 38, wherein the report further comprises names of decision primitives. 41. The method as defined in claim 38, wherein the report further comprises names and types of decision primitives originating or terminating from one or more pages corresponding to the selected user interface components. 42. The method as defined in claim 38, further comprising generating the report as an HTML document. 43. A method of simulating and validating behavior for a computer application that is to be developed, the method comprising: displaying on an electronic display an interactive simulation area comprising one or more user interface components that simulate a behavior of the computer application to be developed; displaying a requirements area comprising one or more statements, where a statement describes a desired behavior for a user interface component; and associating the one or more user interface components with the one or more statements such that a user interface component displayed in the simulation area is associated with a displayed statement of the requirements area, and such that an association between the user interface component and the displayed statement is maintained. 44. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein at least one of the one or more statements corresponds to a requirement. 45. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising displaying the association between a user interface component and a displayed statement by performing at least one of: displaying an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the corresponding user interface component; or displaying the identifier in the requirements area approximately adjacent to the associated statement. 46. The method as defined in claim 45, wherein the identifier is automatically assigned by a simulation application. 47. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein the identifier corresponds to an automatically assigned cross reference number. 48. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein the interactive simulation area and the requirements area are displayed together, and wherein manipulation of a scrollbar by a user changes a viewable area including at least a first view and a second view, such that in the first view, the interactive simulation area is visible, and in the second view, the requirements area is visible. 49. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising displaying the interactive simulation area, displaying the requirements area, and associating the one or more user interface components with the one or more statements using a computer program with a consistent user interface. 50. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising automatically generating hypertext markup language (HTML) code corresponding to content for at least one of the simulation area or the requirements area. 51. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein the interactive simulation area and the requirements area are displayed together, and further comprising changing from displaying the interactive simulation area and displaying the requirements area to displaying the interactive simulation area but not the requirements area at least partly in response to a user actuating a control. 52. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising displaying an “add requirement” area configured to permit a user to add a statement and associate the statement with a selected user interface component of the interactive simulation area. 53. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising: displaying on the computer display an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the user interface component; monitoring a position of a cursor manipulated by a pointing device, wherein the cursor is determined to be adjacent the identifier in the interactive simulation area; and at least partly in response to receiving an indication of a selection of an identifier displayed in the interactive simulation area from the pointing device, selecting for display a statement corresponding to the identifier in the requirements area. 54. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising: displaying on the computer display an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the user interface component; monitoring a position of a cursor manipulated by a pointing device, wherein the cursor is determined to be adjacent the identifier in the interactive simulation area; and at least partly in response to receiving an indication of a selection of an identifier displayed in the interactive simulation area from the pointing device: receiving one or more attributes to form a statement for the requirements area; and associating the statement with the identifier. 55. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein the one or more statements corresponds to one or more statements or to one or more portions of a statement regarding a desired or necessary behavior of the computer application that is to be developed. 56. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a page. 57. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a form. 58. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a table. 59. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a text input primitive. 60. The method as defined in claim 43, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a button. 61. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising at least one component that simulates computation available in a computer application. 62. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising at least one component that simulates storage and retrieval available in a computer application. 63. The method as defined in claim 43, further comprising generating a report, further comprising: selecting user interface components to be described in the report; including an image corresponding to the selected user interface components in the report; selectively retrieving statements corresponding to the selected user interface components; and including the selectively retrieved statements in the report. 64. The method as defined in claim 63, wherein the report further comprises a summarization of control flow connections that originate from primitives of the selected user interface components. 65. The method as defined in claim 63, wherein the report further comprises names of decision primitives. 66. The method as defined in claim 63, wherein the report further comprises names and types of decision primitives originating or terminating from one or more pages corresponding to the selected user interface components. 67. The method as defined in claim 63, further comprising generating the report as an HTML document. 68. A computer system that simulates and validates behavior for a computer application that is to be developed, the computer system comprising: a first component configured to generate a display of an interactive simulation area comprising one or more user interface components that simulate a behavior of the computer application to be developed, wherein the first component is further configured to generate a display of a requirements area comprising one or more statements, where a statement describes a desired behavior for a user interface component; and a second component configured to associate the one or more user interface components with the one or more statements such that a user interface component displayed in the simulation area is associated with a displayed statement of the requirements area, and such that an association between the user interface component and the displayed statement is maintained. 69. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein at least one of the one or more statements corresponds to a requirement. 70. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the first component is further configured to generate a display of the association between a user interface component and a displayed statement, and where the first component is further configured to generate at least one of: a display of an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the corresponding user interface component; or a display of the identifier in the requirements area approximately adjacent to the associated statement. 71. The computer system as defined in claim 70, wherein the computer system is configured to automatically assign the identifier. 72. The computer system as defined in claim 71, wherein the computer system is configured to automatically assign a cross reference number to an identifier. 73. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the first component is further configured to display the interactive simulation area and the requirements area together, and in response to a manipulation of a scrollbar by a user, the first component is further configured to change a viewable area including at least a first view and a second view, such that in the first view, the interactive simulation area is visible, and in the second view, the requirements area is visible. 74. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the first component is further configured to generate, with a consistent user interface, the display of the interactive simulation area, the display of the requirements area, and a display for assignment of association. 75. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the first component is further configured to automatically generate hypertext markup language (HTML) code corresponding to content for at least one of the simulation area or the requirements area. 76. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the first component is further configured to display the interactive simulation area and the requirements area together, and where the first component is further configured, at least partly in response to a user actuating a control, to change the generated display of the interactive simulation area and the requirements area to a generated display of the interactive simulation area without the requirements area. 77. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the first component is further configured to generate a display of an “add requirement” area configured to permit a user to add a statement and associate the statement with a selected user interface component of the interactive simulation area. 78. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the computer system is further configured to: generate a display of an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the user interface component; monitor a position of a cursor manipulated by a pointing device, wherein the cursor is determined to be adjacent the identifier in the interactive simulation area; and at least partly in response to a selection of an identifier displayed in the interactive simulation area from the pointing device, generate for display a statement corresponding to the identifier in the requirements area. 79. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the computer system is further configured to: generate a display of an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the user interface component; monitor a position of a cursor manipulated by a pointing device, wherein the cursor is determined to be adjacent the identifier in the interactive simulation area; and at least partly in response to a selection of an identifier displayed in the interactive simulation area from the pointing device: to receive one or more attributes for a statement for the requirements area; and to associate the statement with the identifier. 80. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the one or more statements corresponds to one or more statements or to one or more portions of a statement regarding a desired or necessary behavior of the computer application that is to be developed. 81. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a page. 82. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a form. 83. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a table. 84. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a text input primitive. 85. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein at least one of the user interface components is a button. 86. The computer system as defined in claim 68, further comprising at least one component that simulates computation available in a computer application. 87. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein at least one component that simulates storage and retrieval available in a computer application. 88. The computer system as defined in claim 68, wherein the computer system is further configured to generate a report of selected user interface components, where the report includes: an image corresponding to the selected user interface components in the report; and statements corresponding to the selected user interface components. 89. The computer system as defined in claim 88, wherein the report further comprises a summarization of control flow connections that originate from primitives of the selected user interface components. 90. The computer system as defined in claim 88, wherein the report further comprises names of decision primitives. 91. The computer system as defined in claim 88, wherein the report further comprises names and types of decision primitives originating or terminating from one or more pages corresponding to the selected user interface components. 92. The computer system as defined in claim 88, wherein the computer system is further configured to generate the report as an HTML document. 93. A computer system that is configured to simulate and validate behavior for a computer application that is to be developed, the computer system comprising: a means for displaying on an electronic display an interactive simulation area comprising one or more user interface components that simulate a behavior of the computer application to be developed; a means for displaying a requirements area comprising one or more statements, where a statement describes a desired behavior for a user interface component; and a means for associating the one or more user interface components with the one or more statements such that a user interface component displayed in the simulation area is associated with a displayed statement of the requirements area, and such that an association between the user interface component and the displayed statement is maintained. 94. The computer system as defined in claim 93, wherein at least one of the one or more statements corresponds to a requirement. 95. The computer system as defined in claim 93, further comprising a means for displaying the association between a user interface component and a displayed statement, where the means for displaying comprises at least one of: a means for displaying an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the corresponding user interface component; or a means for displaying the identifier in the requirements area approximately adjacent to the associated statement. 96. A first computer program embodied in a computer-readable medium for simulating and validating behavior for a second computer application that is to be developed, the first computer program comprising: instructions configured to display on an electronic display an interactive simulation area comprising one or more user interface components that simulate a behavior of the second computer application to be developed; instructions configured to display a requirements area comprising one or more statements, where a statement describes a desired behavior for a user interface component; and instructions configured to associate the one or more user interface components with the one or more statements such that a user interface component displayed in the simulation area is associated with a displayed statement of the requirements area, and such that an association between the user interface component and the displayed statement is maintained. 97. The first computer program as defined in claim 96, wherein at least one of the one or more statements corresponds to a requirement. 98. The first computer program as defined in claim 96, further comprising instructions configured to display the association between a user interface component and a displayed statement, further comprising at least one of: instructions configured to display an identifier in the interactive simulation area approximately adjacent to the corresponding user interface component; or instructions configured to display the identifier in the requirements area approximately adjacent to the associated statement.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (83)
LaRoche David C. ; Anderson Timothy A., Application testing with virtual object recognition.
Bahrs, Peter C.; Chancey, Raphael Poole; Feigenbaum, Barry Alan; Modh, Manish Mahesh; Sundberg, Sean Michael; Woolfrey, John Allen Hubert; Brown, Michael Wilfrid, Controlling presentation of a GUI, using view controllers created by an application mediator, by identifying a destination to access a target to retrieve data.
Peaslee John M. (Chino Hills CA) Malacarne Jeffrey C. (Chino Hills CA), Dual programmable block texturing and complex clipping in a graphics rendering processor.
Turpin William Monroe ; Brown Kevin Lane ; Bogrett Steven Ward, Graphical programming system and methods for assisting a user with creating screen objects on a screen device.
Cunningham Robert E. (Palo Alto CA) Bonar Jeffery G. (Pttsburgh PA) Corbett John D. (Pittsburgh PA), Interactive method of developing software interfaces.
Huang, Yun-Wu; Johnson, Robert David; Martin, Sean James; Martin, Simon L.; Matsa, Moshe Morris Emanuel; Pollak, Roger A.; Ponzo, John J.; Woan, Ronald So-tse, Methods and apparatus for a web application processing system.
Schaeffer Arnold (Belmont CA) Anderson David R. (Cupertino CA) Palevich Jack H. (Sunnyvale CA) Rosenstein Larry S. (Santa Clara CA), Object-oriented collaboration system.
Eick Stephen G. (Naperville IL) Lucas Paul J. (Naperville IL) Wills Graham J. (Lisle IL), Object-oriented functionality class library for use in graphics programming.
Myers Jr., Kenneth N.; Plunkett, Galen P.; Beckley, Jennie D.; Mroczek, Debra Ann; Nguyen, Quynh Anh, Product catalog for use in a collaborative engineering environment and method for using same.
Pommier Theresa M. ; Schwartz Krista S. ; Carleton Allison A. ; Fitzpatrick Catherine M., Remote collaboration system with multiple host computers using multiple applications.
Bly Sara A. (Mountain View CA) Farrand A. Brady (Berkeley CA) Hodges Jeffery D. (Newark CA) Kupfer Michael D. (Mountain View CA) Lewis Brian T. (Palo Alto CA) Maybury William J. (Torrance CA) Tallan , Representation of collaborative multi-user activities relative to shared structured data objects in a networked workstat.
Wang Xuguang (Provo UT) Red Walter E. (Provo UT) Manley Peter H. (Alpine UT), Robot end-effector terminal control frame (TCF) calibration method and device.
Keller Steven ; Gorzela Richard ; Strom Daniel ; Hughes David ; Holt James, Software development system with an executable working model in an interpretable intermediate modeling language.
Fontana James Albert ; Iyengar Sridhar Srinivasa ; Pitchford Anthony Reginald ; Smith Norman Roy ; Tolbert Douglas Marshall, Software system development framework.
Rance Cleaveland ; Scott A. Smolka ; Philip M. Lewis ; Y. S. Ramakrishna, Specification and verification for concurrent systems with graphical and textual editors.
Chang Roger A. (Irving TX) Smith Andrew J. (Trophy Club TX) Torres Robert J. (Colleyville TX), System and method for computer aided software engineering.
Beckett, Stephen; Lamberti, Santino; Palmer, Todd; Beckett, Becky; Yoder, Henry; Donnelly, Ray; McDougald, Danny; House, Donald, System and method for visual application development without programming.
Judd Robert P. (Rochester Hills MI) White John F. (Ypsilanti MI) Hickman Peter K. (Ann Arbor MI) Brown Mark E. (Brighton MI) Sauter John A. (Ann Arbor MI), System for combining originally software incompatible control, kinematic, and discrete event simulation systems into a s.
Blasciak Andrew (Colorado Springs CO) Parets Greg (Loveland CO), System of debugging software through use of code markers inserted into spaces in the source code during and after compil.
Schmit, Geoffrey; Brumley, Jonathan; Schwan, Brent; Levy, Jack, System of measurements experts and method for generating high-performance measurements software drivers.
Bentley,Keith; Bentley,Barry; Bentley,Raymond; Gooding,John; Wilson,Sam, System, method and computer program product for collaborative engineering using component and file oriented tools.
Martin,Maurice; Brickley,Stephen; Amdour,Leon; Kravets,Alex; Fan,Brian; Infante,Dominic; Larking,Stuart; Aldama,Paul, Systems and methods for defining a simulated interactive web page.
Okita Glen K. ; Agarwal Suresh K. ; Bodie Margaret K. ; Lin Fung-Wah ; Chan Yiu Man ; McCalmont David T. ; Blatt Robert A., Transaction flow editing tool.
Namma Eimei,JPX ; Kaga Tomomi,JPX, Virtual WWW server for enabling a single display screen of a browser to be utilized to concurrently display data of a plurality of files which are obtained from respective servers and to send command.
Fowlow Brad G. ; Nuyens Greg B. ; Ludolph Frank, Visual composition tool for constructing application programs using distributed objects on a distributed object network.
Dickman Bernard N. (Middletown NJ) Mond Nancy E. (East Brunswick NJ) Patel Arunkumar R. (Sommerset NJ), Visual programming of telephone network call processing logic.
Montag Bruce C. (San Antonio TX) Wenzel Dennis J. (San Antonio TX) Weyrauch Richard P. (San Antonio TX), Weather effects generator for simulation systems.
Hsu, Victor; Smith, Martin; Hashem, Samir, System for exportable graphical designs with interactive linked comments between design and playback environments.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.