초록 ▼

A method to balance a wheel assembly. In a first aspect, corrective balance weights and position thereof are determined by a balancer and a closest corrective balance weight thereto is chosen, as well as one of higher and one of lower weight increment for each plane; chosen weights are paired to pro

A method to balance a wheel assembly. In a first aspect, corrective balance weights and position thereof are determined by a balancer and a closest corrective balance weight thereto is chosen, as well as one of higher and one of lower weight increment for each plane; chosen weights are paired to provide minimized residual and then attached to the planes of the wheel assembly. In a second aspect, imbalance weights are determined by a balancer; a pair of corrective balance weights, one at least ½ the determined imbalance weight are chosen, each separated by determined position angles to minimize residual and then respectively attached to the corrective balance plane(s) of the wheel assembly.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A method to balance a wheel assembly having a first balance corrective plane and a second balance corrective plane, comprising the steps of: selecting predetermined discrete sizes of balance weights for all available candidate corrective balance weights;measuring the wheel assembly for an imbalan

1. A method to balance a wheel assembly having a first balance corrective plane and a second balance corrective plane, comprising the steps of: selecting predetermined discrete sizes of balance weights for all available candidate corrective balance weights;measuring the wheel assembly for an imbalance; andbalancing the assembly, comprising the steps of: creating a first multiplicity of the candidate corrective balance weights for the first balance corrective plane and a second multiplicity of the candidate corrective balance weights for the second balance corrective plane;creating a multiplicity of pair-wise combinations of the candidate corrective balance weights by selecting one candidate corrective balance weight from the first multiplicity and one candidate corrective balance weight from the second multiplicity of the candidate corrective balance weights for multiplicity of all possible pair-wise combinations of selections, said pair-wise combinations including one candidate corrective balance weight each from the first multiplicity of the candidate corrective balance weights and the second multiplicity of the candidate corrective balance weights;evaluating the multiplicity of pair-wise combinations of the candidate corrective balance weights for minimization of couple and static forces and couple and static balance residuals;selecting a unitary corrective pair-wise combination of corrective balance weights from the multiplicity of pair-wise combinations of the candidate corrective balance weights based on the step of evaluating the multiplicity of pair-wise combinations;affixing the selected first corrective balance weight from the first multiplicity of the unitary corrective pair-wise combination of corrective balance weights to the assembly at the first corrective plane; andaffixing the selected second corrective balance weight from the second multiplicity of the unitary corrective pair-wise combination of corrective balance weights to the assembly at the second corrective plane. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: said first corrective plane is perpendicular to a spin axis of the assembly;said second corrective plane is perpendicular to the spin axis of the assembly and axially displaced from that of the first corrective plane; andsaid step of measuring imbalance comprises: selecting a first radius within the first corrective plane;selecting a second radius within the second corrective plane; anddetermining a first amount of imbalance weight within the first plane at the first radius and a second amount of imbalance weight within the second plane at the second radius. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein said step of selecting predetermined discrete sizes of balance weights for available candidate corrective balance weights comprises selecting possible discrete sizes that are integer multiples of one of ⅛ ounce, ¼ ounce, 2.5 gram and 5.0 gram. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein said step of creating multiplicities of candidate corrective balance weights, comprises: creating the first multiplicity of the candidate corrective balance weights comprising a first selected candidate corrective balance weight of the first multiplicity closest in available weight value to the first amount of imbalance weight, a second candidate corrective balance weight one increment greater than the first selected candidate corrective balance weight of the first multiplicity, and a third candidate corrective balance weight of the first multiplicity, one increment less than the first selected candidate corrective balance weight of the first multiplicity, provided the weight value thereof is other than zero; andcreating the second multiplicity of candidate corrective balance weights comprising a first selected candidate corrective balance weight of the second multiplicity closest in available weight value to the second amount of imbalance weight, a second candidate corrective balance weight of the second multiplicity one increment greater than the first selected candidate corrective balance weight of the second multiplicity, and a third candidate corrective balance weight of the second multiplicity, one increment less than the first selected candidate corrective balance weight of the second multiplicity, provided the weight value thereof is other than zero. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of selecting predetermined discrete sizes of balance weights for available candidate corrective balance weights comprises selecting possible discrete sizes that are integer multiples of one of ⅛ ounce, ¼ ounce, 2.5 gram and 5.0 gram. 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said step of evaluating the multiplicity of pair-wise combinations of candidate corrective balance weights comprises: establishing a predetermined limit of couple residual imbalance; andminimizing static imbalance residual within the predetermined limit of couple residual imbalance. 7. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of evaluating the multiplicity of pair-wise combinations of the candidate corrective balance weights comprises: establishing a predetermined limit of couple residual imbalance; andminimizing static imbalance residual within the predetermined limit of couple residual imbalance. 8. The method of claim 2, wherein said step of evaluating the multiplicity of pair-wise combinations of the candidate corrective balance weights comprises: establishing a predetermined limit of couple residual imbalance; andminimizing static imbalance residual within the predetermined limit of couple residual imbalance. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of selecting a unitary corrective pair-wise combination of balance weights comprises: establishing a tolerance range of static residual imbalance;selecting the pair-wise combination of the candidate corrective balance weights from one of the pair-wise combinations of the candidate corrective balance weights yielding minimum static residual imbalance within the tolerance range of static residual imbalance. 10. A method to balance a wheel assembly having at least one predetermined corrective balance plane, comprising the steps of: selecting predetermined discrete sizes of balance weights for all available candidate discrete corrective balance weights;measuring the wheel assembly for an imbalance, w0; andbalancing the assembly comprising the steps of: creating a pair of corrective balance weights comprising a first corrective balance weight w1 at an angular location θ1 and a second corrective balance weight w2 at an angular location θ2, wherein θ1 and θ2 are measured with respect to a line reference 180 degrees from that of the measured imbalance, w0, and satisfying: w1*cos(θ1)+w2*cos(θ2)=w0;w1*sin(θ1)=w2*sin(θ2); and(w1+w2)≧w0;affixing w1 to the assembly within the at least one corrective balance plane at the angular location θ1; andaffixing w2 to the assembly within the at least one corrective balance plane at the angular location θ2. 11. The method of claim 10 wherein an overlap of affixed corrective balance weights, w1 and w2 is avoided and a sum of the corrective balance weights, w1+w2 is minimized. 12. The method of claim 11 wherein: the at least one predetermined corrective plane comprises a first corrective plane perpendicular to a spin axis of the assembly; and a second corrective plane perpendicular to the spin axis of the assembly and axially displaced from that of the first corrective plane; andsaid step of measuring imbalance comprises: selecting a first radius within the first corrective plane;selecting a second radius within the second corrective plane; anddetermining a first amount of imbalance weight within the first plane at the first radius and a second amount of imbalance weight within the second plane at the second radius. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the pair of corrective balance weights in the first corrective plane are identical. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the pair of corrective balance weights in the second corrective plane are identical. 15. The method of claim 10 wherein: the predetermined at least one corrective plane comprises a first corrective plane perpendicular to a spin axis of the assembly; and a second corrective plane perpendicular to the spin axis of the assembly and axially displaced from that of the first corrective plane;a first amount of imbalance weight, wo, within the first corrective plane, a first corrective balance weight, w1, and a second corrective balance weight, w2, within the first corrective plane;a second amount of imbalance weight, w0′, within the second corrective plane, a first corrective balance weight, w1′, and a second corrective balance weight, w2′, within the second corrective plane; andsaid step of measuring imbalance comprises: selecting a first radius within the first corrective plane;selecting a second radius within the second corrective plane; anddetermining the first amount of imbalance weight within the first corrective plane at the first radius and the second amount of imbalance weight within the second corrective plane at the second radius. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the pair of corrective balance weights in the first corrective plane are identical. 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the pair of corrective balance weights in the second corrective plane are identical. 18. The method of claim 15, wherein each of the corrective weights of the pair of corrective balance weights are identical. 19. The method of claim 10, wherein each of the corrective weights of the pair of corrective balance weights are identical. 20. The method of claim 10, wherein said step of selecting predetermined discrete sizes of balance weights for available candidate corrective balance weights comprises selecting possible discrete sizes that are integer multiples of one of ⅛ ounce, ¼ ounce, 2.5 gram and 5.0 gram.