Controlling meta-data of information resources
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G06Q-010/00
G06Q-020/00
출원번호
US-0700998
(2003-11-04)
등록번호
US-8392226
(2013-03-05)
발명자
/ 주소
Hamm, Mark D.
Greer, James B.
Johnson, Robert C.
출원인 / 주소
Viabridge, Inc.
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
0인용 특허 :
10
초록▼
Controlling information resources involves accessing a control definition of a number of control definitions associated with a first party and a second party. The first party has a first information resource and the second party has a second information resource, where the first information resource
Controlling information resources involves accessing a control definition of a number of control definitions associated with a first party and a second party. The first party has a first information resource and the second party has a second information resource, where the first information resource is in communication with the second information resource. The control definitions define a practice for monitoring the second information resource, where each control definition has a condition and a consequence. Meta-data is received from a second monitor of the second information resource, where the meta-data describes operation of the second information resource. The condition is applied to the meta-data in order to monitor the second information resource.
대표청구항▼
1. A method for controlling one or more information resources, comprising: establishing, by a processor of a shared control hub, a relationship between a first party and a second party based on information about the first party and the second party prior to initiating a negotiation between the first
1. A method for controlling one or more information resources, comprising: establishing, by a processor of a shared control hub, a relationship between a first party and a second party based on information about the first party and the second party prior to initiating a negotiation between the first party and the second party, the relationship defining at least in part how the first party and the second party negotiate a control definition of one or more control definitions associated with the first party and the second party;initiating, after establishing the relationship between the first party and the second party, by the processor of the shared control hub, the negotiation between the first party and the second party of the control definition of the one or more control definitions associated with the first party and the second party using the established relationship, the shared control hub not a party of the negotiation, the control definition defined according to a shared framework of control, the first party having a first information resource distinct from the processor, the second party having a second information resource distinct from the processor, the first information resource exchanging business information with the second information resource, the one or more control definitions defining a practice for monitoring the first information resource and the second information resource, each control definition of the one or more control definitions having a condition and a consequence;communicating, by the processor, a proposal for the condition of the control definition between the first party and the second party, the proposal proposing a first parameter describing a first vital sign indicating operation of the first information resource and a second parameter describing a second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource;receiving meta-data from a first monitor corresponding to the first information resource and a second monitor corresponding to the second information resource, the meta-data describing the first vital sign indicating operation of the first information resource and the second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource;applying, by the processor, the condition of the control definition of the one or more control definitions to the meta-data in order to monitor the first information resource and the second information resource;determining from the meta-data that there is a violation of the control definition; andnotifying the first party and the second party. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising initiating the consequence in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data. 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising initiating a response process to mitigate damage in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data. 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a template corresponding to the first party, the template comprising a control objective of the first party. 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: generating a template corresponding to the first party, the template comprising a control objective of the first party; andproviding the template to the second party to initiate negotiation between the first party and the second party. 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising negotiating the control definition of the one or more control definitions. 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining a control objective agreed upon by the first party and the second party;generating the control definition of the one or more control definitions in accordance with the control objective; andnegotiating the control definition of the one or more control definitions. 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: establishing a community comprising the first party, the second party, and a third party having a third information resource;collecting data associated with the one or more control definitions; andreporting the data. 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: collecting data associated with the one or more control definitions;generating a statistic using the data; andreporting the statistic. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing access to a third party monitoring service to the second party; andreceiving the meta-data from the second monitor through the third party monitoring service. 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising testing the control definition to determine whether the control definition operates as defined. 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising: identifying an opportunity to change the one or more control definitions; andchanging the one or more control definitions in response to identifying the opportunity. 13. A system for controlling one or more information resources, comprising: a computer memory and a processor of a shared control hub configured to: establish a relationship between a first party and a second party based on information about the first party and the second party prior to initiating a negotiation between the first party and the second party, the relationship defining at least in part how the first party and the second party negotiate a control definition of one or more control definitions associated with the first party and the second party;initiate after establishing the relationship between the first party and the second party, negotiation between the first party and the second party of the control definition of the one or more control definitions associated with the first party and the second party using the established relationship, the shared control hub not a party of the negotiation, the control definition defined according to a shared framework of control, the first party having a first information resource distinct from the processor, the second party having a second information resource distinct from the processor, the first information resource exchanging business information with the second information resource, the one or more control definitions defining a practice for monitoring the first information resource and the second information resource, each control definition of the one or more control definitions having a condition and a consequence;communicate a proposal for the condition of the control definition between the first party and the second party, the proposal proposing a first parameter describing a first vital sign indicating operation of, the first information resource and a second parameter describing a second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource; andreceive meta-data from a first monitor corresponding to the first information resource and a second monitor corresponding to the second information resource, the meta-data describing the first vital sign indicating operation of the first information resource and the second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource;a compliance engine coupled to the memory and to the interface, the compliance engine configured to apply the condition of the control definition of the one or more control definitions to the meta-data in order to monitor the first information resource and the second information resource, the compliance engine configured to determine from the meta-data that there is a violation of the control definition; anda response engine configured to notify the first party and the second party. 14. The system of claim 13, the response engine configured to initiate the consequence in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data. 15. The system of claim 13, the response engine configured to initiate a response process to mitigate damage in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data. 16. The system of claim 13, further comprising a negotiation engine configured to generate a template corresponding to the first party, the template comprising a control objective of the first party. 17. The system of claim 13, further comprising a negotiation engine configured to: generate a template corresponding to the first party, the template comprising a control objective of the first party; andprovide the template to the second party to initiate negotiation between the first party and the second party. 18. The system of claim 13, further comprising a negotiation engine configured to negotiate the control definition of the one or more control definitions. 19. The system of claim 13, further comprising a negotiation engine configured to: determine a control objective agreed upon by the first party and the second party;generate the control definition of the one or more control definitions in accordance with the control objective; andnegotiate the control definition of the one or more control definitions. 20. The system of claim 13, the processor configured to: establish a community comprising the first party, the second party, and a third party having a third information resource;collect data associated with the one or more control definitions; andreport the data. 21. The system of claim 13, the processor configured to: collect data associated with the one or more control definitions;generate a statistic using the data; andreport the statistic. 22. The system of claim 13, the processor configured to: provide access to a third party monitoring service to the second party; andreceive the meta-data from the second monitor through the third party monitoring service. 23. The system of claim 13, further comprising an engine configured to test the control definition to determine whether the control definition operates as defined. 24. The system of claim 13, further comprising an improvement engine configured to: identify an opportunity to change the one or more control definitions; andchange the one or more control definitions in response to identifying the opportunity. 25. One or more computer readable storage media storing with one or more tangible embodied instructions for controlling one or more information resources, the instructions executable by a processor and configured to: establish, by a shared control hub, a relationship between a first party and a second party based on information about the first party and the second party prior to initiating a negotiation between the first party and the second party, the relationship defining at least in part how the first party and the second party negotiate a control definition of one or more control definitions associated with the first party and the second party;initiate, after establishing the relationship between the first party and the second party, by the shared control hub, negotiation between the first party and the second party of the control definition of the one or more control definitions associated with the first party and the second party using the established relationship, the shared control hub not a party of the negotiation, the control definition defined according to a shared framework of control, the first party having a first information resource, the second party having a second information resource, the first information resource exchanging business information with the second information resource, the one or more control definitions defining a practice for monitoring the first information resource and the second information resource, each control definition of the one or more control definitions having a condition and a consequence;communicate a proposal for the condition of the control definition between the first party and the second party, the proposal proposing a first parameter describing a first vital sign indicating operation of the first information resource and a parameter second describing a second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource;receive meta-data from a first monitor corresponding to the first information resource and a second monitor corresponding to the second information resource, the meta-data describing the first vital sign indicating operation of the first information resource and the second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource; andapply the condition of the control definition of the one or more control definitions to the meta-data in order to monitor the first information resource and the second information resource;determine from the meta-data that there is a violation of the control definition; andnotify the first party and the second party. 26. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to initiate the consequence in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data. 27. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to initiate a response process to mitigate damage in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data. 28. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to generate a template corresponding to the first party, the template comprising a control objective of the first party. 29. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to: generate a template corresponding to the first party, the template comprising a control objective of the first party; andprovide the template to the second party to initiate negotiation between the first party and the second party. 30. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to negotiate the control definition of the one or more control definitions. 31. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to: determine a control objective agreed upon by the first party and the second party;generate the control definition of the one or more control definitions in accordance with the control objective; andnegotiate the control definition of the one or more control definitions. 32. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to: establish a community comprising the first party, the second party, and a third party having a third information resource;collect data associated with the one or more control definitions; andreport the data. 33. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to: collect data associated with the one or more control definitions;generate a statistic using the data; andreport the statistic. 34. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to: provide access to a third party monitoring service to the second party; andreceive the meta-data from the second monitor through the third party monitoring service. 35. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to test the control definition to determine whether the control definition operates as defined. 36. The media of claim 25, the instructions further configured to: identify an opportunity to change the one or more control definitions; andchange the one or more control definitions in response to identifying the opportunity. 37. A method for controlling one or more information resources, comprising: establishing, by a processor of a shared control hub, a relationship between a first party and a second party based on information about the first party and the second party prior to generating a template for negotiation between the first party and the second party, the relationship defining at least in part how the first party and the second party negotiate a control definition of one or more control definitions associated with the first party and the second party;generating, after establishing the relationship between the first party and the second party, the template for negotiation between the first party and the second party, the template comprising a control objective of the first party, the first party having a first information resource exchanging business information with a second information resource of the second party;providing the template to the second party to initiate negotiation between the first party and the second party;determining, by the processor of the shared control hub, a control objective agreed upon by the first party and the second party using the established relationship, the shared control hub not a party of the negotiation;generating, by the processor, the control definition of the one or more control definitions in accordance with the control objective, the control definition defined according to a shared framework of control, the one or more control definitions defining a practice for monitoring the first information resource and the second information resource, each control definition of the one or more control definitions having a condition and a consequence;communicate a proposal for the condition of the control definition between the first party and the second party, the proposal proposing a first parameter describing a first vital sign indicating operation of the first information resource and a second parameter describing a second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource;receiving an acceptance of the control definition from the second party;receiving meta-data from a first monitor corresponding to the first information resource and a second monitor corresponding to the second information resource, the meta-data describing the first vital sign indicating operation of the first information resource and the second vital sign indicating operation of the second information resource, the meta-data received by providing access to a third party monitoring service to the second party, and by receiving the meta-data from the second monitor through the third party monitoring service;applying, by the processor, the condition of the control definition of the one or more control definitions to the meta-data in order to monitor the first information resource and the second information resource;determining from the meta-data that there is a violation of the control definition;notifying the first party and the second party;initiating the consequence in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data by initiating a response process to mitigate damage in accordance with the application of the condition to the meta-data, and by initiating a settlement process to share a cost resulting from the violation;establishing a community comprising the first party, the second party, and a third party having a third information resource;collecting data associated with the one or more control definitions;generating a statistic using the data; andreporting the statistic.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (10)
Dan,Asit; Dias,Daniel Manuel; Halim,Nagui; Lam,Linh Hue; Sachs,Martin William, Automated dynamic negotiation of electronic service contracts.
Ainsbury Robert D. ; Al Hussein Hussein K. ; Hinnant Michael C. ; Lahham Muwaffaq M. ; Ludin Stephen L. ; Putterman Daniel S. ; Shotton Frederick R. ; Tejada Wilfredo M., Method and apparatus for performing data collection, interpretation and analysis, in an information platform.
Clarke, Jr., Edward P.; Herger, Lorraine M.; Rosu, Marrcel-Catalin; Schaffa, Frank A.; Stern, Edith H., Method and system of configuring elements of a distributed computing system for optimized value.
Ginter Karl L. ; Shear Victor H. ; Sibert W. Olin ; Spahn Francis J. ; Van Wie David M., Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.