초록 ▼

In an industrial control configuration, various instances can exist that are based upon a definition. A definition can be changed and thus it can be appropriate to alter related instances in accordance with the change. However, changing an instance can cause disruption in other actions even when the

In an industrial control configuration, various instances can exist that are based upon a definition. A definition can be changed and thus it can be appropriate to alter related instances in accordance with the change. However, changing an instance can cause disruption in other actions even when the change is minor. Therefore, various standards can be used to determine if a change to an instance should be propagated automatically or at another time, such as after an operation. The determination can be based on artificial intelligence techniques, user preference, a defined rule set, user instruction, as well as other standards.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A method, comprising: employing a processor executing computer executable instructions embodied on a non-transitory computer readable medium to perform operations, comprising: identifying a change to a definition, wherein the definition comprises logical program code executable on one or more ind

1. A method, comprising: employing a processor executing computer executable instructions embodied on a non-transitory computer readable medium to perform operations, comprising: identifying a change to a definition, wherein the definition comprises logical program code executable on one or more industrial automation control devices; andemploying a rule set to determine a manner in which to propagate the change to one or more instances of the definition on the one or more industrial automation control devices, wherein the rule set specifies to propagate the change to an instance of the one or more instances of the definition if the instance is being employed in a manufacturing operation, and to not propagate the change to the instance of the one or more instances of the definition if the instance is not being employed in the manufacturing operation. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the rule set defines a timeframe at which to propagate the change to the one or more instances of the definition. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the timeframe is immediate. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the timeframe is a delay. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the delay is based upon waiting for a particular state to occur in the manufacturing operation. 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the delay is based upon waiting for an upcoming event to occur associated with in the manufacturing operation. 7. The method of claim 4, wherein the delay is based upon waiting for input from a user. 8. The method of claim 2, wherein the timeframe for a first subset of the one or more instances of the definition is a first timeframe, and the timeframe for a second subset of the one or more instances of the definition is a second timeframe, the first timeframe is different than the second timeframe. 9. The method of claim 2, wherein the timeframe is based upon a length of time to complete the propagation to the one or more instances of the definition. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the rule set specifies to propagate the change to a customized instance of the one or more instances of the definition. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the rule set specifies to propagate the change to local instances of the one or more instances of the definition, and to not propagate the change to remote instances of the one or more instances of the definition. 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the rule set specifies to not propagate the change to the one or more instances of the definition if the change is from an unauthorized source. 13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution, cause at least one device including a processor to perform operations comprising: identifying a change to a definition, wherein the definition comprises logical program code executable on one or more industrial automation control devices; andemploying a rule set to determine a manner in which to propagate the change to one or more instances of the definition on the one or more industrial automation control devices, wherein the rule set specifies to propagate the change to an instance of the one or more instances of the definition if the instance is being employed in a manufacturing operation, and to not propagate the change to the instance of the one or more instances of the definition if the instance is not being employed in the manufacturing operation. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the rule set defines a timeframe at which to propagate the change to the one or more instances of the definition. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the rule set specifies to propagate the change to local instances of the one or more instances of the definition, and to not propagate the change to remote instances of the one or more instances of the definition. 16. A system, comprising: a processor;a memory communicatively coupled to the processor, the memory having stored therein computer-executable instructions, comprising: an identification component configured to identify a change to a definition, wherein the definition comprises logical program code executable on one or more industrial automation control devices; anda resolution component configured to employ a rule set to determine a manner in which to propagate the change to one or more instances of the definition on the one or more industrial automation control devices, wherein the rule set specifies to propagate the change to an instance of the one or more instances of the definition if the instance is being employed in a manufacturing operation, and to not propagate the change to the instance of the one or more instances of the definition if the instance is not being employed in the manufacturing operation. 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the rule set defines a timeframe at which to propagate the change to the one or more instances of the definition. 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the timeframe is a delay based upon waiting for a particular state to occur of a production line in which the one or more instances of the definition is employed. 19. The system of claim 16, wherein the rule set specifies to propagate the change to local instances of the one or more instances of the definition, and to not propagate the change to remote instances of the one or more instances of the definition. 20. The system of claim 16, wherein the rule set further specifies to not propagate the change to the one or more instances of the definition if the change is from an unauthorized source.