An approach is provided for video monitoring. A video server records an event to output a video master and to generate a video proxy of the master. A monitoring server transmits the video proxy to a central monitoring system that is configured to correlate the video proxy with other video proxies fr
An approach is provided for video monitoring. A video server records an event to output a video master and to generate a video proxy of the master. A monitoring server transmits the video proxy to a central monitoring system that is configured to correlate the video proxy with other video proxies from a plurality of sources.
대표청구항▼
1. A method comprising: receiving a first video proxy of a first master surveillance video of a monitored event, captured by a first monitoring system;receiving a second video proxy of a second master surveillance video of the monitored event, captured by a second monitoring system, wherein the firs
1. A method comprising: receiving a first video proxy of a first master surveillance video of a monitored event, captured by a first monitoring system;receiving a second video proxy of a second master surveillance video of the monitored event, captured by a second monitoring system, wherein the first and second video proxies are of lower resolution than the first and second master surveillance videos;correlating video information, associated with the first video proxy and the second video proxy, to determine a level of correlation;generating, based on the level of correlation, an alert related to the monitored event;storing the first master surveillance video and the second master surveillance video in a database;receiving a request for access to a mapped portion of the first master surveillance video or the second master surveillance video based on frame information derived from the correlating, andtransmitting the mapped portion to the first monitoring system and the second monitoring system in response to the request. 2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising: transmitting the alert to the first monitoring system and the second monitoring system. 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the correlating is an activity of a workflow. 4. A method according to claim 1, wherein, when the first video proxy is generated in a first format that is compatible with the first monitoring system, and the second video proxy is generated in a second format that is compatible with the second system, the first format being different from the second format, the method further comprising: converting the first video proxy into the second format, orconverting the second video proxy into the first format. 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first monitoring system includes a local database, the first monitoring system being configured to compare content of the local database, related to the monitored event, with the first video proxy. 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the second monitoring system includes a local database configured to store video information, the second monitoring system being configured to compare content of the local database, related to the monitored event, with the second video proxy, the comparison being concurrent with the comparison performed by the first monitoring system. 7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the database is a centralized database. 8. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first master surveillance video and the second master surveillance video are output from live feeds of the monitored event. 9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the request is processed by a workflow engine configured to determine a format of the mapped portion in response to the request, the method further comprising: transmitting the mapped portion, at a specified time, in the determined format. 10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first video proxy is received by a network device including a handheld computer, a wireless personal digital assistant (RDA) device, or a personal computer. 11. A system comprising: a first processing module configured to receive a first video proxy of a first master video of an event under surveillance, obtained at a first monitoring system, and to receive a second video proxy of a second master video of the event under surveillance, obtained at a second monitoring system, wherein the first and second video proxies are of lower resolution than the first and second master videos;a second processing module configured to correlate video information associated with the first video proxy and the second video proxy, to determine a level of correlation, and generate, based on the level of correlation, an alert related to the event under surveillance; anda database configured to store the first video master and the second video master, and receive a request for access to a mapped portion of the first video master or the second video master based on frame information derived from the correlation, and the first processing module being further configured to transmit the mapped portion to the first monitoring system and the second monitoring system in response to the request. 12. A system according to claim 11, wherein the second processing module is further configured to transmit the alert to the first monitoring system and the second monitoring system. 13. A system according to claim 11, wherein the correlation is an activity of a workflow. 14. A system according to claim 11, wherein, when the first video proxy is generated in a first format that is compatible with the first monitoring system and the second video proxy is generated in a second format that is compatible with the second monitoring system, the first format and the second format being different, the second processing module being further configured to: convert the first video proxy into the second format, orconvert the second video proxy into the first format. 15. A system according to claim 11, wherein the first monitoring system includes a local database, the first monitoring system being configured to compare content of the local database, related to the event under surveillance, with the first video proxy. 16. A system according to claim 15, wherein the second monitoring system includes a local database, the second monitoring system being configured to compare content of the local database, related to the event under surveillance, with the second video proxy, the comparison being concurrent with the comparison performed by the first monitoring system. 17. A system according to claim 11, wherein the database is a centralized database. 18. A system according to claim 11, wherein the first video master and the second video master are output from live feeds of the event under surveillance. 19. A system according to claim 11, further comprising: a workflow engine configured to process the request to determine a format of the mapped portion in response to the request, and transmit the mapped portion to the first monitoring system at a specified time and in the determined format. 20. A system according to claim 11, wherein the first video proxy is received by a network device including a handheld computer, a wireless personal digital assistant (PDA) device, or a personal computer. 21. A method comprising: recording an event, under surveillance, to output a high resolution video master;generating a lower resolution video proxy, relative to the video master;transmitting the video proxy to a central monitoring system that is configured to correlate the video proxy with other video proxies, received from a plurality of sources of other recordings of the event under surveillance;receiving, from the central monitoring system, an alert related to the event under surveillance, based on a level of correlation, between the video proxy and at least one of the other video proxies, determined at the central monitoring system;receiving a request for access to a mapped portion of the high resolution video master based on frame information derived from the correlating of the video proxy with the at least one other video proxy, andtransmitting the mapped portion in response to the request. 22. A method according to claim 21, wherein the central monitoring system is further configured to coordinate output of the alert to the plurality of sources. 23. A method according to claim 21, further comprising: transmitting the video master to the central monitoring system for storage. 24. A method according to claim 23, further comprising: reviewing the video proxy for a desired sequence of frames; andtransmitting a request, to the central monitoring system, for a portion of the stored video master corresponding to the desired sequence. 25. A system comprising: a video server configured to record an event, under surveillance, to output a video master and to generate a video proxy of the video master; anda monitoring server configured to:transmit the video proxy to a central monitoring system that is configured to correlate the video proxy with other video proxies from a plurality of sources associated with recordings of the event under surveillance, andreceive, from the central monitoring system, an alert related to the event under surveillance, based on a level of correlation, between the video proxy and at least one of the other video proxies, determined at the central monitoring system;receive a request for access to a mapped portion of the video master based on frame information derived from the correlating of the video proxy with the at least one other video proxy, andtransmit the mapped portion in response to the request. 26. A system according to claim 25, wherein the central monitoring system is further configured to coordinate output of the alert to the monitoring server and the plurality of sources. 27. A system according to claim 25, wherein the video server is further configured to transmit the video master to the central monitoring system for storage. 28. A system according to claim 27, wherein the monitoring server is further configured to review the video proxy for a desired sequence of frames, and to transmit a request, to the central monitoring system, for a portion of the stored video master corresponding to the desired sequence.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (61)
MacIssac, Brian; Simser, David, Common data model including field interdependencies.
Roger Georges Bitar ; Jean Chen Ho ; Jing-Song Jang ; Erik Allan Kane ; James Louis Keesey ; Angela Go Reyda ; Gerald Johann Wilmot, Complex data query support in a partitioned database system.
Leenstra ; Sr. Richard B. (Bremerton WA) Wurden Edwin H. (Poulsbo WA), Computer driven systems and methods for managing data which use two generic data elements and a single ordered file.
Komine, Hiroaki; Yokoshi, Noriyuki; Yokota, Hiroko, Data management apparatus storing uncomplex data and data elements of complex data in different tables in data storing system.
Vigneaux Stevan ; Wheeler Blair F. ; Mason Philip ; Pierceall Richard M. ; Scott Adrian,GB2 ; Boucher ; Jr. Roland J. ; Morrison William C. ; Hennessy Richard D., Digital multimedia editing and data management system.
Downs Edgar ; Gruse George Gregory ; Hurtado Marco M. ; Lehman Christopher T. ; Milsted Kenneth Louis ; Lotspiech Jeffrey B., Electronic content delivery system.
Bingham Ronald E. (Capitola CA) Dockter Michael J. (Hollister CA) Farber Joel F. (San Jose CA) Seppi Kevin D. (Austin TX), Facility for the generic storage and management of multimedia objects.
Carlin Richard K. ; Frantz ; II Joseph F., Interactive system for remoting creating, editing and administrating an online communcation system for a plurality of on.
Henninger Derek P. (Cupertino CA) Jensen Richard H. (Redwood City CA) Keene Christopher T. (San Francisco CA), Method and apparatus for automatic generation of object oriented code for mapping relational data to objects.
Fraenkel Michael L. ; Singhal Sandeep Kishan, Method and system for portably enabling view synchronization over the world-wide web using frame hierarchies.
Zakrzewski,Radoslaw Romuald; Sadok,Mokhtar; Shirer,Jeffrey James; Zeliff,Robert Lowell, Method for detection and recognition of fog presence within an aircraft compartment using video images.
Srinivasan Uppili Rangarajan ; Tardiveau Max, Method for synchronizing the schema of a database with its representation in an object-oriented repository.
Curtis Allen J. ; Whiteley Stephen T. ; Rassool Reza A., Method of pre-caching or pre-fetching data utilizing thread lists and multimedia editing systems using such pre-caching.
Durflinger Kevin (Lafayette IN) Reid Jon D. (West Lafayette IN) Logan Kim M. (Lafayette IN), Multi-model database management system engine for databases having complex data models.
Anderson Matthew Paul ; Donn Siyi Terry ; Fallside David Couttie ; Ha Tri Q. ; Hembry Douglas Michael ; Ho Jean C. ; Jang Jing-Song ; Mattos Nelson ; Niblack Carlton Wayne ; Petkovic Dragutin ; Tung , Relational database extenders for handling complex data types.
Anderson Matthew Paul ; Donn Siyi Terry ; Fallside David Couttie ; Ha Tri Quac ; Hembry Douglas Michael ; Ho Jean C. ; Jang Jing-Song ; Mattos Nelson ; Niblack Carlton Wayne ; Petkovic Dragutin ; Tun, Relational database extenders for handling complex data types.
Loveman Jason S. ; Allen Mark S. ; White Ronald ; Haynes Charles E., Simultaneous storage and network transmission of multimedia data with video host that requests stored data according to response time from a server.
Namioka Miyoko (Sagamihara JPX) Satoh Kazuhiro (Ebina JPX) Yamamoto Youichi (Kawasaki JPX) Moki Keiji (Kawasaki JPX), System of object oriented inheritance using the temporal status of superclasses.
Ginter Karl L. ; Shear Victor H. ; Sibert W. Olin ; Spahn Francis J. ; Van Wie David M., Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection.
Ginter, Karl L.; Shear, Victor H.; Spahn, Francis J.; Van Wie, David M.; Weber, Robert P., Trusted infrastructure support system, methods and techniques for secure electronic commerce transaction and rights management.
Billau, Ronald L.; Di Luoffo, Vincenzo V.; Dumarot, Dan P.; Paschal, Matthew J.; Schulz, Brandon W.; Woodbury, James E., Automated authorization to access surveillance video based on pre-specified events.
Billau, Ronald L.; Di Luoffo, Vincenzo V.; Dumarot, Dan P.; Paschal, Matthew J.; Schulz, Brandon W.; Woodbury, James E., Automated authorization to access surveillance video based on pre-specified events.
Billau, Ronald L.; Di Luoffo, Vincenzo V.; Dumarot, Dan P.; Paschal, Matthew J.; Schulz, Brandon W.; Woodbury, James E., Distributed control of a heterogeneous video surveillance network.
Billau, Ronald L.; Di Luoffo, Vincenzo V.; Dumarot, Dan P.; Paschal, Matthew J.; Schulz, Brandon W.; Woodbury, James E., Distributed control of a heterogeneous video surveillance network.
Billau, Ronald L.; Di Luoffo, Vincenzo V.; Dumarot, Dan P.; Paschal, Matthew J.; Schulz, Brandon W.; Woodbury, James E., Providing emergency access to surveillance video.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.