Aspects of the disclosure relate to detecting and responding to objects in a vehicle's environment. For example, an object may be identified in a vehicle's environment, the object having a heading and location. A set of possible actions for the object may be generated using map information describin
Aspects of the disclosure relate to detecting and responding to objects in a vehicle's environment. For example, an object may be identified in a vehicle's environment, the object having a heading and location. A set of possible actions for the object may be generated using map information describing the vehicle's environment and the heading and location of the object. A set of possible future trajectories of the object may be generated based on the set of possible actions. A likelihood value of each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories may be determined based on contextual information including a status of the detected object. A final future trajectory is determined based on the determined likelihood value for each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories. The vehicle is then maneuvered in order to avoid the final future trajectory and the object.
대표청구항▼
1. A computer-implemented method comprising: identifying, by one or more computing devices, an object in a vehicle's environment, the object having a heading and location;generating, by the one or more computing devices, a set of possible actions for the object using map information describing the v
1. A computer-implemented method comprising: identifying, by one or more computing devices, an object in a vehicle's environment, the object having a heading and location;generating, by the one or more computing devices, a set of possible actions for the object using map information describing the vehicle's environment and the heading and location of the object;generating, by the one or more computing devices, a set of possible future trajectories of the object based on the set of possible actions;receiving, by the one or more computing devices, contextual information including a status of the detected object;determining, by the one or more computing devices, a likelihood value of each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories based on the contextual information;determining, by the one or more computing devices, a final future trajectory based on the determined likelihood value for each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories; andmaneuvering, by the one or more computing devices, the vehicle in order to avoid the final future trajectory and the object. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the final future trajectory includes: comparing the likelihood value for each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories to a threshold value; anddiscarding a trajectory from the set of trajectories when the likelihood value of that trajectory does not meet the threshold value, wherein the likelihood value of the discarded trajectory is not used to determine the final future trajectory. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the final future trajectory includes: when none of the trajectories of the set of possible future trajectories meet the threshold value, identifying a plurality of waypoints for each trajectory in the set of trajectories, wherein a waypoint includes at least one of a position, a velocity, and a timestamp;determining a trajectory of the vehicle, wherein the trajectory of the vehicle includes a plurality of waypoints; andcomparing, at a same timestamp, each of the waypoints to a waypoint associated with a trajectory of the vehicle in order to determine the final future trajectory. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the final future trajectory includes: identifying a situational relationship between the object and the vehicle;comparing the likelihood value of the trajectories remaining in the set of possible future trajectories to a second threshold different from the first threshold value, anddiscarding a second trajectory from the trajectories remaining in the set of possible future trajectories when the likelihood value of that second trajectory does not meet the second threshold value, wherein the likelihood value of the discarded second trajectory is not used to determine the final future trajectory. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein after discarding the second trajectory, the remaining trajectories of the set of possible future trajectories are each identified as final future trajectories, such that maneuvering the vehicle includes avoiding each of the remaining trajectories of the set of possible future trajectories. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the final future trajectory includes selecting a trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories with a highest likelihood value as the final future trajectory. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the set of possible actions includes discarding an action from the set of possible actions for failing to comply with a model of possible actions for the object. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the set of possible actions is further based on a past trajectory of the object. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the contextual information further describes a status of a second object in the vehicle's environment. 10. A system comprising one or more computing devices configured to: identify an object in a vehicle's environment, the object having a heading and location;generate a set of possible actions for the object using map information describing the vehicle's environment and the heading and location of the object;generate a set of possible future trajectories of the object based on the set of possible actions;receive contextual information including a status of the detected object;determine a likelihood value of each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories based on the contextual information;determine a final future trajectory based on the determined likelihood value for each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories; andmaneuver the vehicle in order to avoid the final future trajectory and the object. 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to determine the final future trajectory by: comparing the likelihood value for each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories to a threshold value; anddiscarding a trajectory from the set of trajectories when the likelihood value of that trajectory does not meet the threshold value, wherein the likelihood value of the discarded trajectory is not used to determine the final future trajectory. 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to determine the final future trajectory by: when none of the trajectories of the set of possible future trajectories meet the threshold value, identifying a plurality of waypoints for each trajectory in the set of trajectories, wherein a waypoint includes at least one of a position, a velocity, and a timestamp;determining a trajectory of the vehicle, wherein the trajectory of the vehicle includes a plurality of waypoints; andcomparing, at a same timestamp, each of the waypoints for each trajectory to a waypoint of the trajectory of the vehicle to determine the final future trajectory. 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to determine the final future trajectory by: identifying a situational relationship between the object and the vehicle;comparing the likelihood value of the trajectories remaining in the set of possible future trajectories to a second threshold different from the first threshold value, anddiscarding a second trajectory from the trajectories remaining in the set of possible future trajectories when the likelihood value of that second trajectory does not meet the second threshold value, wherein the likelihood value of the discarded second trajectory is not used to determine the final future trajectory. 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to, after discarding the second trajectory, identify the remaining trajectories of the set of possible future trajectories as each being final future trajectories, such that maneuvering the vehicle includes avoiding each of the remaining trajectories of the set of possible future trajectories. 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to determine the final future trajectory by selecting a trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories with a highest likelihood value as the final future trajectory. 16. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to determine the final future trajectory by discarding an action from the set of possible actions for failing to comply with a model of possible actions for the object. 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to generate the set of possible actions further based on a past trajectory of the object. 18. The system of claim 10, wherein the contextual information further describes a status of a second object in the vehicle's environment. 19. The system of claim 10, wherein the vehicle is an autonomous vehicle. 20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium on which instructions are stored, the instructions, when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform a method, the method comprising: identifying an object in a vehicle's environment, the object having a heading and location;generating a set of possible actions for the object using map information describing the vehicle's environment and the heading and location of the object;generating a set of possible future trajectories of the object based on the set of possible actions;receiving contextual information including a status of the detected object;determining a likelihood value of each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories based on the contextual information;determining a final future trajectory based on the determined likelihood value for each trajectory of the set of possible future trajectories; andmaneuvering the vehicle in order to avoid the final future trajectory and the object.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (85)
Oda, Tamami; Watanabe, Tomo; Sato, Tsuyoshi, AUTOMATIC VEHICLE GUIDANCE SYSTEM, CONTROL APPARATUS IN AUTOMATIC VEHICLE GUIDANCE SYSTEM, AUTOMATIC VEHICLE GUIDANCE METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE DATA RECORDED MEDIUM IN WHICH AUTOMATIC VEHICLE GUI.
Huang, Jihua; Lin, William C.; Chin, Yuen-Kwok, Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on maneuvers at highway on/off ramps.
Isogai Akira,JPX ; Takagi Kiyokazu,JPX, Automatic deceleration control system, vehicle-to-obstacle distance control system, and system program storage medium for vehicle.
Latarnik Michael (Friedrichsdorf DEX) Kolbe Alexander (Gross Zimmern DEX) Honus Klaus (Frankfurt am Main DEX), Circuit configuration and method for controlling a traction slip control system with brake and/or engine management.
Trepagnier, Paul Gerard; Nagel, Jorge Emilio; Dooner, Matthew Taylor; Dewenter, Michael Thomas; Traft, Neil Michael; Drakunov, Sergey; Kinney, Powell; Lee, Aaron, Control and systems for autonomously driven vehicles.
Trepagnier, Paul Gerard; Nagel, Jorge Emilio; Dooner, Matthew Taylor; Dewenter, Michael Thomas; Traft, Neil Michael; Drakunov, Sergey; Kinney, Powell; Lee, Aaron, Control and systems for autonomously driven vehicles.
Trepagnier, Paul Gerard; Nagel, Jorge Emilio; Dooner, Matthew Taylor; Dewenter, Michael Thomas; Traft, Neil Michael; Drakunov, Sergey; Kinney, Powell; Lee, Aaron, Control and systems for autonomously driven vehicles.
Holloway,Lane Thomas; Kobrosly,Walid M.; Malik,Nadeem; Quiller,Marques Benjamin, Limiting and controlling motor vehicle operation functions enabled for each of a group of drivers of the vehicle.
Christopher Kenneth Hoover Wilson ; Seth Olds Rogers ; Patrick Wyatt Langley, Method and system for autonomously developing or augmenting geographical databases by mining uncoordinated probe data.
Bhogal, Kulvir S.; Peterson, Robert R.; Seacat, Lisa A.; Talbot, Mark W., Method and system to alert user of local law via the Global Positioning System (GPS).
Toepfer Bernhard (Stuttgart DEX) Reiner Michael (Fellbach DEX) Klein Bodo (Borsinghausen DEX), Method of determining a wear-dependent braking force distribution.
Trepagnier, Paul Gerard; Nagel, Jorge Emilio; Kinney, Powell McVay; Dooner, Matthew Taylor; Wilson, Bruce Mackie; Schneider, Jr., Carl Reimers; Goeller, Keith Brian, Navigation and control system for autonomous vehicles.
O Connor, Michael L.; Bell, Thomas; Eglington, Michael L.; Leckie, Lars; Gutt, Gregory M.; Zimmerman, Kurt R., Rapid adjustment of trajectories for land vehicles.
Rao Prithvi N. (Pittsburgh PA) Shin Dong Hun (Pittsburgh PA) Whittaker William L. (Pittsburgh PA) Kleimenhagen Karl W. (Peoria IL) Singh Sanjiv J. (Pittsburgh PA) Kemner Carl A. (Peoria Heights IL) B, System and method for enabling an autonomous vehicle to track a desired path.
Barrett,David S.; Allard,James; Filippov,Misha; Pack,Robert Todd; Svendsen,Selma, System and method for processing safety signals in an autonomous vehicle.
Norris, William Robert; Allard, James; Filippov, Mikhail O.; Haun, Robert Dale; Turner, Christopher David Glenn; Gilbertson, Seth; Norby, Andrew Julian, Systems and methods for switching between autonomous and manual operation of a vehicle.
Nagda, Paresh; Li, Wenbin; Howlett, Julia; Fan, Rodric C.; Yang, Xinnong; Fay, James D., Using location data to determine traffic and route information.
Harumoto,Satoshi; Yamato,Toshitaka; Takeuchi,Hiroshi; Maeno,Yoshihiko; Miyamoto,Naotoshi; Sakiyama,Kazuhiro, Vehicle control apparatus, vehicle control method, and computer program.
Kleen, Andro; Rhede, Johannes; Meinecke, Marc-Michael; Ricknäs, Daniel, Device for displaying information about an imminent takeover of manual control of a vehicle.
Nettleton, Eric; Hennessy, Ross; Durrant-Whyte, Hugh; Göktogan, Ali Haydar, Integrated automation system for regions with variable geographical boundaries.
Duncan, William David; Hyde, Roderick A.; Petroski, Robert C.; Wood, Jr., Lowell L., Vehicle collision management responsive to traction conditions in an avoidance path.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.