Personalized plant asset data representation and search system
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G05B-023/02
G06F-017/30
출원번호
US-0855789
(2007-09-14)
등록번호
US-9323247
(2016-04-26)
발명자
/ 주소
Dillon, Steven R.
Rome, Gregory H.
출원인 / 주소
FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC.
대리인 / 주소
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
0인용 특허 :
149
초록▼
A process control system collects data, or status information, pertaining to assets of a process plant from various sources or functional areas of the plant. The collected information may then be accessed by a user through a user interface routine displaying a graphical user interface to that user's
A process control system collects data, or status information, pertaining to assets of a process plant from various sources or functional areas of the plant. The collected information may then be accessed by a user through a user interface routine displaying a graphical user interface to that user's computer. An asset data and search expert tracks user interaction with plant data by, for example, tracking the types of search fields a user most frequently searches with or the type of information a user more frequently browses for. The expert automatically profiles this tracked information to develop user preferences that are later used in personalizing the reporting of asset data, personalizing searching for asset data, and personalizing the results of such searches.
대표청구항▼
1. A method of reporting status information, the method comprising: receiving, at a process control user interface, a user request from a user and identifying an area or device within a process plant based on the user request, wherein the area or device is associated with a first plurality of status
1. A method of reporting status information, the method comprising: receiving, at a process control user interface, a user request from a user and identifying an area or device within a process plant based on the user request, wherein the area or device is associated with a first plurality of status indicators representing a measurement of health or performance of the area or device, each of the first plurality of status indicators representing a status of the area or device;receiving, from a data source in response to the user request, user-personalized status indicators regarding the area or device, wherein the user-personalized status indicators represent a personalized selection, with respect to the user, of a subset of the first plurality of status indicators based on profile data associated with the user;prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators based on historical user preference data of the user to identify a subset of high priority user-personalized status indicators within the user-personalized status indicators, wherein prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators comprises: (i) automatically tracking user interaction data representing a frequency with which a user has viewed a plurality of previously displayed status indicators, where the plurality of previously displayed status indicators may include one or more of the user-personalized status indicators and where such user tracking occurs automatically without user initiated activation using an internal user interaction tracker capable of uninterrupted tracking of user interactions,(ii) profiling historical data, in response to tracking the user interaction data, to identify the historical user preference data, the historical user preference data identifying one or more of the user-personalized status indicators as correlated to the user based on interaction time with one or more of the previously displayed status indicators, and(iii) designating the one or more user-personalized status indicators correlated to the user as the high priority user-personalized status indicators;generating a user-tailored report that includes the high priority user-personalized status indicators ranked above other of the user-personalized status indicators; anddisplaying, to the user, the user-tailored report that includes the high priority user-personalized status indicators ranked above other of the user-personalized status indicators. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the user interaction data is tracked during a search for the status information regarding an area or device within the process plant. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the user interaction data represents a number of times a user interacts with the plurality of previously displayed status indicators. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the user interaction data represents the frequency within which one or more of the plurality of previously displayed status indicators has been accessed by a user. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of status indicators comprises a health index, a variability index, a usability index, or a performance index. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of status indicators comprises an alert status or urgent event status. 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising continuously tracking the user interaction data. 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising tracking the user interaction data in response to a remote initiation signal. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators identifies the high priority user-personalized status indicators and lower priority user-personalized status indicators, and wherein the report displays only the high priority user-personalized status indicators. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators identifies the high priority user-personalized status indicators and lower priority user-personalized status indicators, and wherein the report displays both the high priority user-personalized status indicators and the lower priority user-personalized status indicators. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators comprises prioritizing based on a single profile parameter of the historical user preference data. 12. The method of claim 11 further comprising: ranking the user-personalized status indicators based on a first profile parameter to determine a first data ranking; andranking the first data ranking based on at least one second profile parameter to produce a second data ranking. 13. The method of claim 1, wherein prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators comprises prioritizing based on multiple profile parameters of the historical user preference data. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the user request is a first search request, wherein the user-personalized status indicators contain initial search results data in response to the first search request, wherein generating the user-tailored report comprises generating a search report containing the high priority user-personalized status indicators, and wherein displaying the user-tailored report comprises displaying the search report containing the high priority user-personalized status indicators. 15. The method of claim 14 further comprising displaying the user-personalized status indicators separately from the search report. 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the high priority user-personalized status indicators represent predicted search results in response to the first search request. 17. The method of claim 16 further comprising: receiving a second search request from the user, the second search request being received after the first search request;prioritizing the high priority user-personalized status indicators of the search report based on the second search request to create a second search report; anddisplaying the second search report to a user. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the second search report contains only a subset of the high priority user-personalized status indicators of the search report. 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the second search report contains all of the high priority user-personalized status indicators of the search report but where the priority of the high priority user-personalized status indicators has been rearranged in the second search report. 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the historical user preference data comprises information regarding past user access to a status indicator regarding an area or device within the process plant. 21. The method of claim 1, further comprising: correlating the user-personalized status indicators to other correlated status indicators for at least one other area or device in the process plant, such that the subset of high priority user-personalized status indicators includes one or more of the other correlated status indicators and such that the status report displayed to the user includes one or more of the other correlated status indicators,displaying a report of the other correlated status indicators to the user. 22. The method of claim 1, wherein displaying the report to the user comprises: displaying at least one graphical illustration of the report illustrating a graphical plot relating to the high priority user-personalized status indicators. 23. The method of claim 22, further comprising displaying a plurality of different graphic illustrations of the report via a plurality of different graphical plots relating to the high priority user-personalized status indicators, each graphical plot plotting the high priority user-personalized status indicators based on a different plot criteria. 24. A method of reporting status information, the method comprising: receiving, at a process control user interface, a user request from a user and identifying an area or device within a process plant based on the user request, wherein the area or device is associated with a first plurality of status indicators, each of the first plurality of status indicators representing a measurement of health or performance of the area or device;receiving, from a data source in response to the user request, user-personalized status indicators regarding the area or device, wherein the user-personalized status indicators represent a personalized selection, with respect to the user, of a subset of the first plurality of status indicators based on profile data associated with the user;prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators based on historical user preference data of the user to identify a subset of high priority user-personalized status indicators within the user-personalized status indicators, wherein prioritizing the user-personalized status indicators comprises:(i) automatically tracking, and storing as historical data, user interaction data representing a frequency with which a user has viewed a plurality of previously displayed status indicators, where the plurality of previously displayed status indicators may include one or more of the user-personalized status indicators and where such user tracking occurs automatically without user initiated activation using an internal user interaction tracker capable of uninterrupted tracking of user interactions,(ii) analyzing the historical data to identify the historical user preference data, the historical user preference data identifying one or more of the user-personalized status indicators as correlated to the user based on interaction time with one or more of the previously displayed status indicators, and;(iii) designating the one or more user-personalized status indicators correlated to the user as the high priority user-personalized status indicators;determining an assurance factor for the higher priority status information;generating a user-tailored report that includes the high priority user-personalized status indicators ranked above other of the user-personalized status indicators;displaying the user-tailored report to the user by displaying only the high priority user-personalized status indicators if the assurance factor is above a threshold value and displaying the high priority user-personalized status indicators and the lower priority user-personalized status indicators if the assurance factor is below a threshold value. 25. An apparatus for reporting status information, the apparatus comprising: a memory storing status indicators on the areas or devices within the plant;a display for displaying a user-tailored report regarding an area or device within the plant; anda status information reporter configured to:a) receive user-personalized status indicators representing a measurement of health or performance of the area or device from a data source in response to a user request, wherein the user-personalized status indicators represent a personalized selection, with respect to the user, of a subset of the user-personalized status indicators based on profile data associated with a user;b) prioritize the user-personalized status indicators based on historical user preference data of the user to identify a subset of high priority user-personalized status indicators within the user-personalized status indicators, where the historical user preference data is determined by(i) automatically tracking user interaction data representing a frequency with which a user has viewed previously displayed status indicators regarding the area or device, without user initiated activation using an internal user interaction tracker capable of uninterrupted tracking of user interactions,(ii) analyzing the user interaction data to identify the historical user preference data, the historical user preference data identifying one or more of the user-personalized status indicators as correlated to the user based on the historical data, and(iii) designating the one or more of the user-personalized status indicators correlated to the user as the high priority user-personalized status indicators;c) correlate the user-personalized status indicators to other correlated status information, such that the subset of higher priority information includes the other correlated status information; andd) generate the user-tailored report that includes the high priority user-personalized status indicators ranked above other of the user-personalized status indicators. 26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the status information reporter is configured to profile historical data, in response to data from tracking the user interactions, to identify the historical user preference data, the historical data representing past user interaction with status indicators regarding the area or device. 27. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the status information reporter is configured to: store the user interaction data regarding user interaction with status information on an area or device within the process plant and displayed by a computer; andanalyze the user interaction data to develop the user preference data. 28. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the user interaction data is data tracked during a search for status indicators regarding the area or device. 29. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the user interaction data represents an amount of time a user interacts with status indicators regarding the area or device. 30. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the user interaction data represents a number of times a user interacts with status indicators regarding the area or device. 31. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the user interaction data represents the frequency within which status indicators regarding the area or device have been accessed by a user. 32. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the user-personalized status indicators regarding the area or device comprise a health index, a variability index, a usability index, or a performance index. 33. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the user-personalized status indicators regarding the area or device comprise an alert status or urgent event status. 34. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the status information reporter is configured to continuously track user interaction data. 35. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the status information reporter is configured to track user interaction data in response to a remote initiation signal. 36. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the status information reporter is configured to report only the high priority user-personalized status indicators. 37. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the status information reporter is configured to report the high priority user-personalized status indicators and lower priority user-personalized status indicators. 38. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the status information reporter is configured to: rank the user-personalized status indicators based on a first profile parameter to determine a first data ranking; andrank the first data ranking based on at least one second profile parameter to produce a second data ranking. 39. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the status information reporter is configured to prioritize the user-personalized status indicators based on multiple profile parameters of the user preference data. 40. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the user preference data comprises information regarding past user access to status indicators regarding the area or device. 41. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the status information reporter is configured to: display a report of the other correlated status information to the user. 42. The apparatus of claim 25, further comprising a display controller configured to: display at least one graphical illustration of the report illustrating a graphical plot of information relating to the high priority user-personalized status indicators. 43. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the display controller is further configured to display a plurality of different graphic illustrations of the report via a plurality of different graphical plots of the information relating to the high priority user-personalized status indicators, each graphical plot plotting the information relating to the high priority user-personalized status indicators based on a different plot criteria.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (149)
Agrawal Mukul (Plymouth MN) Orrock James E. (Eden Prairie MN) Patiath Pradip K. (Brooklyn Park MN) Rachor Lloyd A. (Brooklyn Park MN), Advanced equipment control system.
Holley Steven R. (Phoenix AZ) Cunningham David C. (Carefree AZ) Kral Kevin D. (Streamwood IL), Apparatus and method for minimizing limit cycle using complementary filtering techniques.
Lipner Melvin H. (Monroeville PA) Impink ; Jr. Albert J. (Murrysville PA), Automatic plant state diagnosis system including a display selection system for selecting displays responsive to the dia.
Boehling Warren A. ; Foskett Alan Morton ; Wheeler Alan Reid, Automatically configurable multi-purpose distributed control processor card for an industrial control system.
Bhat Naveen V. (Houston TX) Braden William B. (Houston TX) Heckendoorn Kent E. (Houston TX) Graettinger Timothy J. (Bethel Park PA) Federowicz Alexander J. (Pittsburgh PA) Dubose Paul A. (Chapel Hill, Control system using an adaptive neural network for target and path optimization for a multivariable, nonlinear process.
Rylander Karen S. (Minneapolis MN) Fant Karl M. (Minneapolis MN) Egli Werner H. (Maple Grove MN), Data projection system with compensation for nonplanar screen.
Aggers John R. (Apple Valley MN) Brindle Ralph C. (Minnetonka MN) Kidder Kenneth B. (Coon Rapids MN) Ullestad David C. (Brooklyn Park MN), Distributed environmental/load control system.
Call William L. ; Clawson Laurence A. ; Connolly Paul S. ; Freimark Ronald J. ; Gustin Jay W. ; Hodge Michael L. ; McGaugh Paul ; Moore Donald W. ; Rachlin Elliott H. ; Ramsdell Steven C., Emulator for visual display object files and method of operation thereof.
Suzuki, Tatsuya; Ohashi, Toshijiro; Miyakawa, Seii; Asano, Masaaki; Kubota, Takashi, Evaluation method and its apparatus of work shop and product quality.
Lake Harold ; Prentice David P. ; Greenup John ; Piper Charles ; Korowitz Simon, Industrial field controlling device with controller and expansion modules.
Bob Spriggs ; Bob Hayashida ; Ken Ceglia ; Diana Seymour ; Mike Peden ; Paul Richetta ; Matt Anderson ; Rich Bennington ; Daryl Frogget ; Scott Roby ; Mark Jensen, Industrial plant asset management system: apparatus and method.
Rusnica Leigh Ann ; Kerch Steven Paul ; Thomas Vaughn M. ; Kenney Stephen Joseph ; Brockhoff ; Jr. Charles Stillwell ; Morris Bert C. ; Roth Emilie Matarasso ; Sugibayashi Nobuo, Information display system.
Wojsznis, Wilhelm K.; Blevins, Terrence L.; Seeman, Richard C.; Nixon, Mark J., Integrated optimal model predictive control in a process control system.
Nasr Hatem N. (Edina MN) Sadjadi Firooz A. (St. Anthony MN) Bazakos Michael E. (Bloomington MN) Amehdi Hossien (Edina MN), Knowledge and model based adaptive signal processor.
Killpatrick Joseph E. (Minneapolis MN) Berndt Dale F. (Plymouth MN) Fritze Keith R. (Long Lake MN) Cary Gregory E. (Mounds View MN), Laser gyro dither strippr gain correction method and apparatus.
Qin S. Joe (Austin TX) Dunia Ricardo H. (Austin TX) Hayes Randall L. (Georgetown TX), Method and apparatus for detecting and identifying faulty sensors in a process.
Keeler James D. ; Hartman Eric J. ; O'Hara Steven A. ; Kempf Jill L. ; Godbole Devendra B., Method and apparatus for preprocessing input data to a neural network.
Bonoyer John J. ; Flanagan Todd J., Method and apparatus for self-calibration of a coordinated control system for an electric power generating station.
Piche Stephen ; Keeler James David ; Hartman Eric ; Johnson William D. ; Gerules Mark ; Liano Kadir, Method for steady-state identification based upon identified dynamics.
Malloy ; deceased John R. (late of Drexel Hill PA by Virginia M. Malloy ; executrix) Olsen Arthur M. (Pennsburg PA), Method of digital process variable transmitter calibration and a process variable transmitter system utilizing the same.
Lu Zhuxin J. (Glendale AZ) MacArthur J. Ward (Scottsdale AZ) Horn Brian C. (Phoenix AZ), Method of multivariable predictive control utilizing range control.
Lu Zhuxin J. (19513 N. 73rd La. Glendale AZ 85308), Method of optimal scaling of variables in a multivariable predictive controller utilizing range control.
Scarola Kenneth ; Jamison David S. ; Manazir Richard M. ; Rescorl Robert L. ; Harmon Daryl L., Method of validating measurement data of a process parameter from a plurality of individual sensor inputs.
La Chance Ralph Edward ; Sardell Richard ; Landry Donald Francis ; Waibel Helmut, Methods and systems for providing electronic documentation to users of industrial process control systems.
Degeneff Robert C. (Niskayuna NY) Gutierrez Moises R. (Troy NY), Methods for generating models of non-linear systems and components and for evaluating parameters in relation to such non.
Britt Herbert I. (Cambridge MA) Joshi Amol P. (Marlboro MA) Mahalec Vladimir (Sudbury MA) Piela Peter C. (Brighton MA) Venkataraman Swaminathan (Waltham MA), Plant simulation and optimization software apparatus and method using dual execution models.
Hallee Donald O. (North Easton MA) Lake Harold (Sharon MA) Johansson Kenneth L. (North Grafton MA) Graves Thomas B. (Norton MA), Process control system with improved fault isolation.
Borchers Hans-Werner,DEX ; Otte Ralf,DEX ; Speh Rainer,DEX ; Weisang Claus,DEX, Process diagnosis system and method for the diagnosis of processes and states in an technical process.
Miyagaki Hisanori (Hitachiota JPX) Shimizu Katsuhito (Hitachi JPX) Tobita Haruya (Hitachi JPX) Takita Atsushi (Mito JPX) Kimura Tooru (Hitachi JPX) Sugano Akira (Katsuta JPX) Kikuchi Masayuki (Hitach, Process monitoring and control system and method of process monitoring and control.
Cheney M. Charles ; Korowitz Simon ; Slechta William M. ; Tobol Nathan H., Protection against communications crosstalk in a factory process control system.
MacArthur J. Ward (Minneapolis MN) Wahlstedt David A. (Minneapolis MN) Woessner Michael A. (Minneapolis MN) Foslien Wendy K. (Minneapolis MN), Receding horizon based adaptive control having means for minimizing operating costs.
Wang Qingsu ; Barnett Gerald ; Greig R. Michael ; Cheng Yi, System and method for performing real time data acquisition, process modeling and fault detection of wafer fabrication p.
Steinman Jethro F. ; Kanji M. Gulam ; Chehadeh Yahia C. ; Himmer Richard P. ; Rosa-Bian John J., System and methods for achieving heterogeneous data flow between algorithm blocks in a distributed control system.
Kessel William C. (Watertown MA) Laclaire John L. (Cambridge MA) Lui Andrew L. (West Newton MA) Locke Michael H. (Lakeville MA) Britt Herbert I. (Cambridge MA), System for displaying different subsets of screen views, entering different amount of information, and determining corre.
Bland Dennis L. (Phoenix AZ) Kast John R. (Phoenix AZ), System for making data available to an outside software package by utilizing a data file which contains source and desti.
Boehling Warren A. ; Peck ; III Stephen Albert ; Wheeler Alan Reid, System for replacing control processor by operating processor in partially disabled mode for tracking control outputs.
Bland Dennis L. ; Koontz Sean C. ; Fox Gary L. ; Strilich James A., Systems and methods for providing dynamic data referencing in a generic data exchange environment.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.