초록 ▼

A system and method for controlling processor instruction execution. In one example, a method for synchronizing a number of instructions performed by processors includes instructing a first processor to iteratively execute instructions via a first set of iterations until a predetermined time period

A system and method for controlling processor instruction execution. In one example, a method for synchronizing a number of instructions performed by processors includes instructing a first processor to iteratively execute instructions via a first set of iterations until a predetermined time period has elapsed. A number of instructions executed in each iteration of the first set of iterations is less than a number of instructions executed in a prior iteration of the first set of iterations. The method also includes instructing a second processor to iteratively execute instructions via a second set of iterations until the predetermined time period has elapsed. A number of instructions executed in each iteration of the second set of iterations is less than a number of instructions executed in a prior iteration of the second set of iterations. The method includes determining whether additional instructions are to be executed.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A method for synchronizing a number of instructions performed by a plurality of processors, comprising: instructing a first processor to iteratively execute instructions via a first plurality of iterations until a predetermined time period has elapsed, wherein a number of instructions executed in

1. A method for synchronizing a number of instructions performed by a plurality of processors, comprising: instructing a first processor to iteratively execute instructions via a first plurality of iterations until a predetermined time period has elapsed, wherein a number of instructions executed in each iteration of the first plurality of iterations is less than a number of instructions executed in a prior iteration of the first plurality of iterations;instructing a second processor synchronized with the first processor to iteratively execute instructions via a second plurality of iterations until the predetermined time period has elapsed, wherein a number of instructions executed in each iteration of the second plurality of iterations is less than a number of instructions executed in a prior iteration of the second plurality of iterations;determining a first total number of instructions executed by the first processor during the predetermined time period;determining a second total number of instructions executed by the second processor during the predetermined time period;instructing the second processor to execute a first calculated number of instructions if the second total number of instructions is less than the first total number of instructions; andinstructing the first processor to execute a second calculated number of instructions if the first total number of instructions is less than the second total number of instructions. 2. The method of claim 1, comprising instructing the first processor to delay processing if the first total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the second total number of instructions. 3. The method of claim 1, comprising instructing the second processor to delay processing if the second total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the first total number of instructions. 4. The method of claim 1, comprising instructing a third processor to iteratively execute instructions via a third plurality of iterations until the predetermined time period has elapsed, wherein a number of instructions executed in each iteration of the third plurality of iterations is less than a number of instructions executed in a prior iteration of the third plurality of iterations. 5. The method of claim 4, comprising determining a third total number of instructions executed by the third processor during the predetermined time period. 6. The method of claim 5, comprising instructing the third processor to execute a third calculated number of instructions if the third total number of instructions is less than the first total number of instructions or the second total number of instructions. 7. The method of claim 5, comprising instructing the third processor to delay processing if the third total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the first total number of instructions, and if the third total number of instructions is greater than or equal the second total number of instructions. 8. The method of claim 5, comprising instructing the first processor to execute a second calculated number of instructions if the first total number of instructions is less than the second total number of instructions or the third total number of instructions. 9. The method of claim 5, comprising instructing the first processor to delay processing if the first total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the second total number of instructions, and if the first total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the third total number of instructions. 10. The method of claim 5, comprising instructing the second processor to execute the first calculated number of instructions if the second total number of instructions is less than the first total number of instructions or the third total number of instructions. 11. The method of claim 5, comprising instructing the second processor to delay processing if the second total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the first total number of instructions, and if the second total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the third total number of instructions. 12. A method comprising: receiving input data into a system;providing the input data to a plurality of processors;executing application code using the input data to produce a respective plurality of outputs from the plurality of processors; andapplying a distributed consensus algorithm to the respective plurality of outputs to produce a consensus output;wherein the plurality of processors comprises: a first processor configured to iteratively execute instructions via a lost plurality of iterations until a predetermined time period has elapsed, wherein a number of instructions executed in each iteration of the first plurality of iterations is less than a number of instructions executed in a prior iteration of the first plurality of iterations; anda second processor synchronized with the first processor configured to iteratively execute instructions via a second plurality of iterations until the predetermined time period has elapsed, wherein a number of instructions executed in each iteration of the second plurality of iterations is less than a number of instructions executed in a prior iteration of the second plurality of iterations, wherein executing the input data comprises instructing the second processor to execute a calculated number of instructions if the second total number of instructions is less than the first total number of instructions. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein executing the input data comprises determining a first total number of instructions executed by the first processor during the predetermined time period and determining a second total number of instructions executed by the second processor during the predetermined time period. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein executing the input data comprises instructing the second processor to delay processing if the second total number of instructions is greater than or equal to the first total number of instructions.