System and method for mitigating an occurrence of a dry spot in a field of view of a star tracker
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G01C-025/00
B64G-001/24
G01C-021/02
G06F-017/30
B64G-001/36
출원번호
US-0309324
(2014-06-19)
등록번호
US-9423255
(2016-08-23)
발명자
/ 주소
Jirapong, Ryan
Needelman, David D.
Taylor, Bradley W.
Moran, Patrick J.
Novean, Michael G.
출원인 / 주소
The Boeing Company
대리인 / 주소
Walters & Wasylyna LLC
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
0인용 특허 :
8
초록▼
A system and method for mitigating an occurrence of a dry spot, the method may include: (1) predicting the occurrence of the dry spot by at least one of determining a location of the occurrence of the dry spot, determining a date of the occurrence of the dry spot, and determining a duration of the o
A system and method for mitigating an occurrence of a dry spot, the method may include: (1) predicting the occurrence of the dry spot by at least one of determining a location of the occurrence of the dry spot, determining a date of the occurrence of the dry spot, and determining a duration of the occurrence of the dry spot; (2) generating a visualization of the occurrence of the dry spot, and (3) modifying a star catalog to reduce an impact of the dry spot by at least one of generating a set of modification to modify the star catalog, generating a modification schedule for modifying the star catalog, and uploading the set of modifications to the star catalog.
대표청구항▼
1. A method implemented by a computing device for mitigating an occurrence of a dry spot, said method comprising: predicting said occurrence of said dry spot at a plurality of attitudes, said dry spot occurring when a star tracker cannot identify a minimum number of tracked stars within a field of v
1. A method implemented by a computing device for mitigating an occurrence of a dry spot, said method comprising: predicting said occurrence of said dry spot at a plurality of attitudes, said dry spot occurring when a star tracker cannot identify a minimum number of tracked stars within a field of view because at least one of said minimum number of tracked stars does not have a corresponding star entry in a star catalog;determining whether said dry spot will impact attitude determination performance based on whether said minimum number of tracked stars predicted to be within said field of view are identifiable by corresponding star entries in said star catalog at said plurality of attitudes; andmodifying a said star catalog to reduce impact on said attitude determination performance due to said dry spot by including at least one modification star entry to said star catalog corresponding to said at least one of said minimum number of tracked stars that does not have said corresponding star entry in said star catalog. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating a visualization of said occurrence of said dry spot. 3. The method of claim 2 wherein generating said visualization of said occurrence of said dry spot comprises: generating a plot comprising a plurality of points of right ascensions and declinations to which a boresight of said star tracker points;determining whether a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker corresponds to a minimum number of star entries in said star catalog at each point of said plurality of points;coding said each point based upon a determination of whether said minimum number of star entries in said star catalog corresponds to said plurality of tracked stars;generating a visual representation of said dry spot based upon said coding of said each point; andgenerating a visual representation of a trajectory of said boresight. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein predicting said occurrence of said dry spot comprises at least one of: determining a location of said occurrence of said dry spot;determining a date of said occurrence of said dry spot; anddetermining a duration of said occurrence of said dry spot. 5. The method of claim 4 wherein determining said location of said occurrence of said dry spot comprises: determining said plurality of attitudes of a vehicle;providing said star catalog, said star catalog comprising a plurality of star entries;determining a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker at said plurality of attitudes;determining whether said plurality of tracked stars corresponds to a minimum number of star entries; anddetermining said location of said occurrence of said dry spot based on said plurality of attitudes where said plurality of tracked stars does not correspond to said minimum number of star entries. 6. The method of claim 4 wherein determining said date of said occurrence of said dry spot comprises: determining said plurality of attitudes of a vehicle;providing said star catalog, said star catalog comprising a plurality of star entries;determining a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker at said plurality of attitudes;determining a first attitude of said plurality of attitudes where said plurality of tracked stars does not correspond to a minimum number of star entries; anddetermining said date of occurrence of said dry spot based on a first time coordinate of said first attitude. 7. The method of claim 4 wherein determining said duration of said occurrence of said dry spot comprises: determining said plurality of attitudes of a vehicle;providing said star catalog, said star catalog comprising a plurality of star entries;determining a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker at said plurality of attitudes;determining a first attitude of said plurality of attitudes where said plurality of tracked stars does not correspond to a minimum number of star entries;determining a second attitude of said plurality of attitudes where said plurality of tracked stars does correspond to said minimum number of star entries does, said second attitude occurring after said first attitude;determining a time period between a first time coordinate of said first attitude and a second time coordinate of said second attitude; anddetermining said duration of said occurrence of said dry spot based on said time period. 8. The method of claim 1 wherein modifying said star catalog comprises at least one of: generating a set of modifications to modify said star catalog;generating a modification schedule for modifying said star catalog; anduploading said set of modifications to said star catalog. 9. The method of claim 8 wherein generating said set of modifications to modify said star catalog comprises: determining said plurality of attitudes of a vehicle;providing said star catalog, said star catalog comprising a plurality of star entries;determining a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker at said plurality of attitudes;determining whether said plurality of tracked stars corresponds to a minimum number of star entries;determining a tracked star of said plurality of tracked stars that does not correspond to a star entry of said plurality of star entries;determining a modification star entry corresponding to said tracked star;determining whether said modification star entry can modify said star catalog; andincluding said modification star entry to said set of modifications. 10. The method of claim 9 wherein determining whether said modification star entry can modify said star catalog comprises: determining whether said modification star entry comprises an exclusionary property;excluding said modification star entry when said modification star entry comprises said exclusionary property; andrecommending said modification star entry when said modification star entry does not comprise said exclusionary property. 11. The method of claim 9 wherein determining whether said modification star entry can modify said star catalog comprises: determining whether at least one star entry of said plurality of star entries is replaceable;determining whether said modification star entry is a viable modification to said star catalog; andrecommending said modification star entry when said star entry is replaceable and is said viable modification. 12. The method of claim 8 wherein generating said modification schedule for modifying said star catalog comprises: determining a first time coordinate where a plurality of tracked stars does not correspond to a minimum number of star entries;determining a second time coordinate prior to said first time coordinate;determining whether said second time coordinate meets modification constraints; andrecommending said second time coordinate as a date/time to upload said set of modifications to said star catalog when said second time coordinate meets said modification constraints. 13. The method of claim 1 wherein predicting said occurrence of said dry spot further comprises: providing first magnitude values of a first plurality of stars;providing second magnitude values of a second plurality of stars, said second plurality of stars being a sub-set of said first plurality of stars;converting said first magnitude values of said first plurality of stars to said second magnitude values of said first plurality of stars; andpredicting a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker based on said second magnitude values. 14. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of predicting said occurrence of said dry spot and modifying said star catalog comprises providing said plurality of attitudes of a vehicle, wherein providing said plurality of attitudes comprises: providing first attitude data comprising a plurality of first time coordinates and an associated plurality of first attitudes;providing a regular time duration; andgenerating second attitude data comprising a plurality of second time coordinates and an associate plurality of second attitudes, said plurality of second time coordinates being spaced apart by said regular time duration. 15. A system for mitigating an occurrence of a dry spot, said system comprising: at least one computing device; anda non-transitory medium storing instructions that, when executed by said at least one computing device, causes said at least one computing device to: predict said occurrence of said dry spot at a plurality of attitudes, said dry spot occurring when a star tracker cannot identify a minimum number of tracked stars within a field of view because at least one of said minimum number of tracked stars does not have a corresponding star entry in a star catalog;determine whether said dry spot will impact attitude determination performance based on whether said minimum number of tracked stars predicted to be within said field of view are identifiable by corresponding star entries in said star catalog at said plurality of attitudes; andmodify said star catalog to reduce an impact of said dry spot by including at least one modification star entry to said star catalog corresponding to said at least one of said minimum number of tracked stars that does not have said corresponding star entry in said star catalog. 16. The system of claim 15 wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: generate a plot comprising a plurality of points of right ascensions and declinations to which a boresight of said star tracker points;determine whether a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker corresponds to a minimum number of star entries in said star catalog at each point of said plurality of points;code said each point based upon a determination of whether said minimum number of star entries in said star catalog corresponds to said plurality of tracked stars;generate a visual representation of said dry spot based upon said coding of said each point; andgenerate a visual representation of a trajectory of said boresight. 17. The system of claim 15 wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to determine at least one of: a location of said occurrence of said dry spot;a date of said occurrence of said dry spot; anda duration of said occurrence of said dry spot. 18. The system of claim 15 wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: generate a set of modifications to modify said star catalog;generate a modification schedule for modifying said star catalog; andupload said set of modifications to said star catalog. 19. The system of claim 15 wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: determine said plurality of attitudes of a vehicle;determine a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker at said plurality of attitudes;determine whether said plurality of tracked stars corresponds to a minimum number of star entries;determine a tracked star of said plurality of tracked stars that does not correspond to a star entry of said plurality of star entries;determine a modification star entry corresponding to said tracked star;determine whether said modification star entry can modify said star catalog; andinclude said modification star entry to said set of modifications. 20. The system of claim 19 wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: determine whether said modification star entry comprises an exclusionary property;determine whether at least one star entry of said plurality of star entries is replaceable;determine whether said modification star entry is a viable modification to said star catalog; andrecommend said modification star entry when said modification star entry does not comprise said exclusionary property, said star entry is replaceable, and said modification star entry is said viable modification. 21. The system of claim 15 wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: determine said plurality of attitudes of a vehicle;determine a plurality of tracked stars within said field of view of said star tracker at said plurality of attitudes;determine a first attitude of said plurality of attitudes where said plurality of tracked stars does not correspond to a minimum number of star entries;determine a second attitude of said plurality of attitudes where said plurality of tracked stars does correspond to said minimum number of star entries, said second attitude occurring after said first attitude;determine a location of said occurrence of said dry spot based on said plurality of attitudes where said minimum number of star entries does not correspond to said plurality of tracked stars;determine a date of occurrence of said dry spot based on a first time coordinate of said first attitude; anddetermine a duration of said occurrence of said dry spot based on a time period between a first time coordinate of said first attitude and a second time coordinate of said second attitude. 22. The system of claim 15 wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: determine a first time coordinate where a plurality of tracked stars does not correspond to a minimum number of star entries;determine a second time coordinate prior to said first time coordinate;determine whether said second time coordinate meets modification constraints; andrecommend said second time coordinate as a date/time to upload said set of modifications to said star catalog when said second time coordinate meets said modification constraints. 23. The system of claim 15 further comprising: first magnitude values of a first plurality of stars; andsecond magnitude values of a second plurality of stars, said second plurality of stars being a sub-set of said first plurality of stars,wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: convert said first magnitude values of said first plurality of stars to said second magnitude values of said first plurality of stars; andpredict a plurality of tracked stars within a field of view of a star tracker based on said second magnitude values. 24. The system of claim 15 further comprising: first attitude data comprising a plurality of first time coordinates and an associated plurality of first attitudes; anda regular time duration,wherein said instructions, when executed by said at least one computing device, further cause said at least one computing device to: generate second attitude data comprising a plurality of second time coordinates and an associate plurality of second attitudes, said plurality of second time coordinates being spaced apart by said regular time duration.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (8)
Yoshikawa Shoji,JPX ; Yamada Katsuhiko,JPX ; Sakashita Hiroshi,JPX ; Yonechi Hiroo,JPX, Attitude determination system for artificial satellite.
Needelman,David D.; Li,Rongsheng; Fowell,Richard A.; Lai,Peter C.; Wu,Yeong Wei A.; Eyerly,Bruce N.; French,Jonathan, Method and apparatus for real-time star exclusion from a database.
Achkar Issam-Maurice (Cannes-La-Bocca FRX) Guillermin Pierre (Nice FRX) Renault Herv (Cannes FRX), Method and device for earth acquisition using the pole star for a three-axis stabilized satellite in a low inclination o.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.