초록 ▼

Embodiments of the invention generally relate to weighing scale diagnostic methods employing a comparison of like component operating parameters. In certain embodiments, the difference between any two current operating parameter values may be compared against a maximum allowable difference, and/or t

Embodiments of the invention generally relate to weighing scale diagnostic methods employing a comparison of like component operating parameters. In certain embodiments, the difference between any two current operating parameter values may be compared against a maximum allowable difference, and/or the deviation of current operating parameters from a calculated measure of central tendency may be determined and compared against a maximum allowable deviation. Alternatively or additionally, a standard statistical test for outliers may be employed. An outlying difference or deviation may be indicative of a problem with the associated component. In other embodiments, the current operating parameters of like components may be compared against calibrated parameters and any deviation of the current parameter for a given component may be compared against the total deviation to determine the percentage of deviation attributable to that component.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A diagnostic method for a weighing scale having multiple force measuring devices, comprising: selecting a plurality of like weighing scale components to be monitored;selecting as a diagnostic parameter an operating parameter that is common to the selected like weighing scale components and should

1. A diagnostic method for a weighing scale having multiple force measuring devices, comprising: selecting a plurality of like weighing scale components to be monitored;selecting as a diagnostic parameter an operating parameter that is common to the selected like weighing scale components and should have approximately the same value for each component during normal operation;receiving at a computer device from each of the selected weighing scale components, an output signal representative of the selected diagnostic parameter;at the computer device, calculating a deviation of the output signal value received from each selected weighing scale component with a stored value established during a known good state of weighing scale component operation;at the computer device, calculating a total deviation by summing the calculated output signal value deviations of each selected weighing scale component;at the computer device, comparing the calculated total deviation against a first predetermined threshold value and determining that the calculated total deviation exceeds the first predetermined threshold value;upon determining that the total deviation exceeds the first predetermined threshold value, using the computer device to calculate the percentage of total deviation that is attributable to each selected weighing scale component;subsequently at the computer device, comparing the percentage of total deviation that is attributable to each selected weighing scale component to a second predetermined threshold value; andin response to the percentage of total deviation attributable to a given selected weighing scale component being determined by the computer device to exceed the second predetermined threshold value, using the computer device to indicate a problem with that weighing scale component. 2. The diagnostic method of claim 1, wherein the weighing scale is a vehicle scale. 3. The diagnostic method of claim 1, wherein the weighing scale components to be monitored are the force measuring devices of the weighing scale. 4. The diagnostic method of claim 3, wherein the force measuring devices are load cells. 5. The diagnostic method of claim 3, wherein the selected diagnostic parameter is the zero drift of the force measuring devices. 6. The diagnostic method of claim 5, wherein the calculated deviation of the output signal value received from each force measuring device is the zero drift of each force measuring device. 7. The diagnostic method of claim 5, wherein the calculated total deviation is the total zero drift of the scale. 8. The diagnostic method of claim 5, wherein the first predetermined threshold value is some percentage of scale capacity. 9. The diagnostic method of claim 5, wherein the second predetermined threshold value is some percentage of total zero drift. 10. The diagnostic method of claim 9, wherein the percentage of total zero drift is between 50%-100%. 11. The diagnostic method of claim 1, wherein the indication of a problem includes the identification of a particular weighing-scale component(s). 12. The diagnostic method of claim 1, wherein the stored value is established during weighing scale component calibration.