Disclosed herein are example embodiments for automated hazard handling routine activation. For certain example embodiments, at least one machine, such as an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV), may: (i) detect at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV;
Disclosed herein are example embodiments for automated hazard handling routine activation. For certain example embodiments, at least one machine, such as an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV), may: (i) detect at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV; or (ii) activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one motivation. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, or so forth.
대표청구항▼
1. An unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) comprising: at least one electronic device including at least: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined
1. An unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) comprising: at least one electronic device including at least: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters;circuitry configured for autonomously detecting at least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation based at least partially on autonomous performance of the at least one diagnostic test;circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV including at least preparing at least one request to adjust a flight path based at least partially on the autonomously detecting at least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation, transmitting the at least one request to the at least one remote UFV, and receiving at least one response to the at least one request from the at least one remote UFV; andcircuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment. 2. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further includes: at least one of: circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV;circuitry configured for comparing a position of the UFV with a position of the at least one other UFV; orcircuitry configured for comparing one or more positioning system (PS) coordinates corresponding to the position of the UFV with one or more PS coordinates corresponding to the position of the at least one other UFV. 3. The UFV of claim 2, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV comprises: at least one of: circuitry configured for receiving at the UFV at least one proximity alert with respect to the at least one other UFV;circuitry configured for receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from the at least one other UFV;circuitry configured for receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from a base station that is associated with the UFV; orcircuitry configured for receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from an air traffic coordination unit. 4. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard detection handling operation further includes: at least one of: circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one object;circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one object using at least one accelerometer;circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one object using at least one contact sensor;circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one other UFV; orcircuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one other UFV including at least circuitry configured for identifying the at least one other UFV via at least one comparison including at least one time corresponding to at least one contact detection by the at least one other UFV. 5. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further comprises: circuitry configured for detecting the at least partial loss of functionality for at least one visual spectrum sensor of the UFV. 6. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further comprises: circuitry configured for detecting the at least partial loss of functionality for at least one positioning system (PS) unit of the UFV. 7. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further comprises: circuitry configured for detecting the at least partial loss of functionality for at least one radio of the UFV. 8. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes: at least one of: circuitry configured for consulting at least one map to adjust at least one flight path of the UFV; orcircuitry configured for inspecting at least one map to ascertain at least one three-dimensional representation of one or more hazards to adjust the at least one flight path of the UFV. 9. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes: circuitry configured for beginning a controlled descent responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. 10. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes: circuitry configured for broadcasting at least one indication of a maneuverability quality corresponding to the UFV responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. 11. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes: at least one of: circuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more governmental constraints orcircuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one of (i) one or more speed limits or (ii) one or more altitude restrictions. 12. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes: at least one of: circuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one populated area; orcircuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for the at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more areas having at least one heat signature. 13. The UFV of claim 1, further comprising: circuitry configured for attempting to communicate with a base station that is associated with the UFV via at least one other UFV. 14. The UFV of claim 1, further comprising: circuitry configured for obeying a received communication indicative that at least one particular sensor of the UFV is not to be employed by the UFV. 15. The UFV of claim 1, further comprising: circuitry configured for deactivating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one deactivation command received from a base station that is associated with the UFV including at least one of: circuitry configured for authenticating that the at least one deactivation command was formulated by the base station that is associated with the UFV; orcircuitry configured for verifying that the at least one deactivation command references at least one deactivation code that originated from the base station that is associated with the UFV. 16. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation comprises: circuitry configured for detecting that a directional or focusing capability of at least one camera has ceased to function, with the at least one camera ordinarily usable by a remote human pilot to identify hazards to the UFV. 17. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within at least one of safe, accurate, or recommended operating parameters. 18. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a power train of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters. 19. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a steering assembly of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters. 20. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a wind speed sensor of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters. 21. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a control module of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters. 22. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a positioning system (PS) of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is no longer providing a positioning fix to the UFV. 23. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that at least one wireless communication device of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is no longer receiving communication signals. 24. The UFV of claim 1 further comprising: circuitry configured for obtaining an indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and at least one remote UFV. 25. The UFV of claim 24, wherein the circuitry configured for obtaining an indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and at least one remote UFV comprises: circuitry configured for receiving an indication of at least one hazard via at least one communication transmission. 26. The UFV of claim 24, wherein the circuitry configured for obtaining an indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and at least one remote UFV comprises: circuitry configured for sensing one or more of sensor readings, telemetry signals, or flight attributes; andcircuitry configured for determining an indication of at least one hazard based at least partially one the one or more of sensor readings, telemetry signals, or flight attributes. 27. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV descends and accelerates based at least partly on the UFV transmitting to the at least one remote UFV a flight trajectory that is desired by the UFV and the UFV receiving from the at least one remote UFV an acknowledgment or a non-conflicting flight trajectory that is intended by the at least one remote UFV. 28. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV exchanges among the at least one remote UFV one or more flight path adjustment options. 29. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV sends a prospective local flight path adjustment for the UFV to the at least one remote UFV, and the UFV receives from the at least one remote UFV a prospective remote flight path adjustment for the at least one remote UFV or a revised suggested prospective local fight path adjustment for the UFV that the at least one remote UFV would prefer. 30. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV including at least preparing at least one of an offer and an acceptance, an offer and an acceptance an acknowledgment, an offer and a rejection, an offer and a counter-offer, a suggestion for an alteration to a planned course, an exchange of signals, or a swapping of offers or intentions associated with adjusting the flight path based at least partially on the autonomously analyzing the one or more flight attributes received from the at least one remote UFV and the indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and the at least one remote UFV, transmitting the at least one request to the at least one remote UFV, and receiving at least one response to the at least one request from the at least one remote UFV. 31. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises: circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV receives at least one current GPS coordinate of the at least one remote UFV from the at least one remote UFV after having sent a request to the at least one remote UFV requesting the at least one current GPS coordinate.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (26)
Schultz, Richard R.; Martel, Florent; Lendway, Matthew; Berseth, Brian L., Adaptive surveillance and guidance system for vehicle collision avoidance and interception.
Abraham, Michael R.; Witt, Christian C.; Yelton, Dennis J.; Sanders-Reed, John N.; Musial, Christopher J., Aircraft collision sense and avoidance system and method.
Corcoran, III, James John, Automatic formation flight control system (AFFCS)?a system for automatic formation flight control of vehicles not limited to aircraft, helicopters, or space platforms.
van Tooren, Joost; Heni, Martin; Knoll, Alexander; Beck, Johannes, Collision and conflict avoidance system for autonomous unmanned air vehicles (UAVs).
Roy, Philippe; Yu, Jun; Linden, David S., Methods, apparatus and systems for enhanced synthetic vision and multi-sensor data fusion to improve operational capabilities of unmanned aerial vehicles.
Vian, John Lyle; Mansouri, Ali Reza; Saad, Emad William, System and method for inspection of structures and objects by swarm of remote unmanned vehicles.
Duggan, David S.; Felio, David A.; Pate, Billy B.; Longhi, Vince R.; Petersen, Jerry L.; Bergee, Mark J., Vehicle control system including related methods and components.
Duggan, David; Felio, David; Pate, Billy; Longhi, Vince; Petersen, Jerry; Bergee, Mark, Vehicle control system including related methods and components.
Ono, Masayuki; Shoji, Yoshihiro; Tanoue, Tetsuharu, Detection method for collision of a flying object against an architectural structure, detection apparatus for collision of a flying object against an architectural structure, and facility for closing an opening of an architectural structure.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.