System and method for dynamic queue management using queue protocols
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
H04L-012/863
H04L-012/873
H04L-012/911
출원번호
US-0469994
(2017-03-27)
등록번호
US-9961009
(2018-05-01)
발명자
/ 주소
Sussman, Adam
Bennett, Robert
Denker, Dennis
출원인 / 주소
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
대리인 / 주소
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
1인용 특허 :
174
초록▼
A system and method for efficiently processing and managing data stored in a queue. A processing device may process the data stored in the queue. Queue protocols can be applied to the queue to efficiently process and manage data stored in the queue. Queue protocols may facilitate efficient use of pr
A system and method for efficiently processing and managing data stored in a queue. A processing device may process the data stored in the queue. Queue protocols can be applied to the queue to efficiently process and manage data stored in the queue. Queue protocols may facilitate efficient use of processing resources that process the data stored in one or more queues. A queue protocol may include at least a first protocol for facilitating transfer of data in the queue to another queue processed by another processing device or a second protocol for inhibiting transfer of data in the queue to another queue.
대표청구항▼
1. A computer-implemented method for predicting future system loads by weighting previous request loads for resources, the method comprising: accessing, at a load management server, one or more data sources;querying the one or more data sources for system load data including a first request load and
1. A computer-implemented method for predicting future system loads by weighting previous request loads for resources, the method comprising: accessing, at a load management server, one or more data sources;querying the one or more data sources for system load data including a first request load and a second request load, the first request load representing a first rate of first query requests for a resource, the second request load representing a second rate of second query requests for the resource, the first query requests occurring during a first time period, and the second query requests occurring during a second time period;identifying each of a first attribute associated with the first time period and a second attribute associated with the second time period, each of the first attribute and the second attribute corresponding to a characteristic of the resource;identifying each of a first weight corresponding to the first attribute and a second weight corresponding to the second attribute;determining a future request load on the one or more data sources, the future request load predicting a load of third query requests to occur during a third time period, the third time period being in the future, and the determination of the future request load being based on at least one of the first weight or the second weight; andidentifying a parameter to associate with the resource for the duration of the third time period occurring in the future. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the first request load is larger than the second request load, or the second request load is larger than the first request load. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third request loads correspond to requests for access rights associated with the resource, an access right facilitating entry to a spatial area associated with the resource. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the first weight is proportional to the first request load and the second weight is proportional to the second request load. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the first attribute indicates a first characteristic of the resource during the first time period, wherein the second attribute indicates a second characteristic of the resource during the second time period, and wherein the first weight is determined based on the first attribute and the second weight is determined based on the second attribute. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining the future request load includes generating an estimation of the future request load during the third time period, wherein the estimation is generated using one or more interpolation processes. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining the future request load for the resource includes generating an estimation of the future request load during the third time period, wherein the estimation is generated using one or more extrapolation processes. 8. A system, comprising: one or more data processors; anda non-transitory computer-readable storage medium containing instructions which, when executed on the one or more data processors, cause the one or more data processors to perform operations including:accessing, at a load management server, one or more data sources;accessing, at a load management server, one or more data sources;querying the one or more data sources for system load data including a first request load and a second request load, the first request load representing a first rate of first query requests for a resource, the second request load representing a second rate of second query requests for the resource, the first query requests occurring during a first time period, and the second query requests occurring during a second time period;identifying each of a first attribute associated with the first time period and a second attribute associated with the second time period, each of the first attribute and the second attribute corresponding to a characteristic of the resource;identifying each of a first weight corresponding to the first attribute and a second weight corresponding to the second attribute;determining a future request load on the one or more data sources, the future request load predicting a load of third query requests to occur during a third time period, the third time period being in the future, and the determination of the future request load being based on at least one of the first weight or the second weight; andidentifying a parameter to associate with the resource for the duration of the third time period occurring in the future. 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the first request load is larger than the second request load, or the second request load is larger than the first request load. 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the first, second, and third request loads correspond to requests for access rights associated with the resource, an access right facilitating entry to a spatial area associated with the resource. 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the first weight is proportional to the first request load and the second weight is proportional to the second request load. 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the first attribute indicates a first characteristic of the resource during the first time period, wherein the second attribute indicates a second characteristic of the resource during the second time period, and wherein the first weight is determined based on the first attribute and the second weight is determined based on the second attribute. 13. The system of claim 8, wherein determining the future request load includes generating an estimation of the future request load during the third time period, wherein the estimation is generated using one or more interpolation processes. 14. The system of claim 8, wherein determining the future request load for the resource includes generating an estimation of the future request load during the third time period, wherein the estimation is generated using one or more extrapolation processes. 15. A computer-program product tangibly embodied in a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium, including instructions configured to cause a data processing apparatus to perform operations including: accessing, at a load management server, one or more data sources;querying the one or more data sources for system load data including a first request load and a second request load, the first request load representing a first rate of first query requests for a resource, the second request load representing a second rate of second query requests for the resource, the first query requests occurring during a first time period, and the second query requests occurring during a second time period;identifying each of a first attribute associated with the first time period and a second attribute associated with the second time period, each of the first attribute and the second attribute corresponding to a characteristic of the resource;identifying each of a first weight corresponding to the first attribute and a second weight corresponding to the second attribute;determining a future request load on the one or more data sources, the future request load predicting a load of third query requests to occur during a third time period, the third time period being in the future, and the determination of the future request load being based on at least one of the first weight or the second weight; andidentifying a parameter to associate with the resource for the duration of the third time period occurring in the future. 16. The computer-program product of claim 15, wherein the first request load is larger than the second request load, or the second request load is larger than the first request load. 17. The computer-program product of claim 15, wherein the first, second, and third request loads correspond to requests for access rights associated with the resource, an access right facilitating entry to a spatial area associated with the resource. 18. The computer-program product of claim 15, wherein the first weight is proportional to the first request load and the second weight is proportional to the second request load. 19. The computer-program product of claim 15, wherein the first attribute indicates a first characteristic of the resource during the first time period, wherein the second attribute indicates a second characteristic of the resource during the second time period, and wherein the first weight is determined based on the first attribute and the second weight is determined based on the second attribute. 20. The computer-program product of claim 15, wherein determining the future request load includes generating an estimation of the future request load during the third time period, wherein the estimation is generated using one or more extrapolation processes.
Smith Barry Craig ; Balakrishnan Vinod ; Green Richard Wenman Pennefather, Apparatus and method of allocating flight inventory resources based on the current market value.
Lupien William A. (La Canada ; Flintridge CA) McCormack John P. (West Boxford MA) Schulman H. E. C. (Boston MA), Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets.
Ahlstrom Mark L. (Minneapolis MN) Keller Bruce A. (Vadnais Heights MN) Storch Randy S. (Chicago IL), Computer reservation system with means to rank travel itineraries chosen in terms of schedule/fare data.
Salmon Bardwell C. (Weston MA) Borgman John D. (Acton MA) Holtey Thomas O. (Newton MA), Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers.
Rose Marshall T. ; Stein Lee H. ; Borenstein Nathaniel S. ; Lowery Carlyn M. ; New Darren ; Stefferud Einar, Computerized payment system for purchasing goods and services on the internet.
Stein Lee H. ; Stefferud Einar A. ; Borenstein Nathaniel S. ; Rose Marshall T., Computerized system for facilitating transactions between parties on the internet using e-mail.
Stein Lee H. ; Stefferud Einar A. ; Borenstein Nathaniel S. ; Rose Marshall T., Computerized system for making payments and authenticating transactions over the internet.
Walker Jay S. ; Lech Robert R. ; Van Luchene Andrew S. ; Sparico Thomas M. ; Jorasch James A. ; Schneier Bruce, Conditional purchase offer management system for event tickets.
Trippe Kenneth A. B. (P.O Box 5915 ; Ponce De Leon Blvd. ; Suite 16 Coral Gables FL 33146) Edgar Peter M. (P.O Box 5915 ; Ponce De Leon Blvd. ; Suite 16 Coral Gables FL 33146) Vollrath David (3085 Av, Cruise information and booking data processing system.
Eglen, Jan Alan; Eglen, Jeremy; Bakke, Justin; Dasbach, Garrick; Voils, Josh, Dynamic pricing of items based on category with which the item is associated.
Berent Thomas Gerard ; Hurst Dennis Wayne ; Patton Thomas Edward ; Tabernik Ty J. ; Warpool Julie Elizabeth ; Reig Donald C. ; Whittle William Howard, Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system.
Gold Leslie I. ; Rostagno Agueda A. ; Baron Martin,GBX ; Campbell Iain D.,GBX ; Williams Michael J.,GBX, Fibrin-binding peptide fragments of fibronectin.
Fraser Richard (10 Glen Avon Dr. Riverside CT 06878), Interactive computer system to match buyers and sellers of real estate, businesses and other property using the internet.
Fraser Alexander G. (Bernardsville NJ) Perea Carlos A. (Somerset NJ) Weber Roy P. (Bridgewater NJ), Mediation of transactions by a communications system.
Walker Jay S. ; Schneier Bruce ; Jorasch James A., Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven cond.
Coates, Joshua L.; Bozeman, Patrick E.; Patterson, David A., Method and apparatus for accessing remote storage in a distributed storage cluster architecture.
Gobburu, Venkata T.; Narayanan, Krishnakumar; Challa, Nagesh; Gannage, Michel E., Method and apparatus for acquiring, maintaining, and using information to be communicated in bar code form with a mobile communications device.
Scott E. Sikora ; Nakul M. Lele ; Rajnish Tahiliani ; Ben L. Yip ; Henry Mingkeung Yeung ; Timothy Merrell, Method and apparatus for allocating mixed transaction type messages to resources via an integrated queuing mechanism.
Griffin Gene R. (Crofton MD) Stoll Sheryl K. (Severn MD) LaBarge Ralph S. (Gambrills MD) Seltzer Martin J. (Oyster Bay NY), Method and apparatus for providing travel destination information and making travel reservations.
Alaia Marc ; Becker David J. ; Bernard Anthony F. ; Heckmann Daniel C. ; Kinney ; Jr. Sam E. ; Meakem Glen T. ; Rago Vincent F. ; Reneau Jason ; Roberts Frederick W. ; Rupp William D. ; Stevens Rober, Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots.
Campbell Gregory L. ; Phillips Robert L. ; Zimmerman Jon P.,GBX ; Saleh Richard A.,GBX ; Grimes Richard C. ; Beskow Stefan L., Method and system for determining marginal values for use in a revenue management system.
Charuk,James Michael; Capper,Russell Neill; Jumper,Samuel Waldon; Cafferky,Sean Allan, Method and system for managing real property transactions having internet access and control.
Brown,Michael Wayne; Dutta,Rabindranath; Paolini,Michael A., Method, system, and program for providing information on proximate events based on current location and user availability.
Kurauchi, Nobukazu; Ageishi, Narutoshi; Suzuki, Motoshi; Kajimoto, Kazuo, Resource management system and digital video reproducing/recording apparatus.
Clark Frederick L. ; Moore Larry W. ; Walker Donny Ray ; Clemens John M ; Kanewske ; III William J. ; Smith B. Jane, Sample container segment assembly.
Husemann Dirk,CHX ; Kaiserwerth Matthias, Smart card mechanism and method for obtaining electronic tickets for goods services over an open communications link.
Jay S. Walker ; Sanjay K. Jindal ; Bruce Schneier ; Toby Weir-Jones, System and method for managing third-party input to a conditional purchase offer (CPO).
Donner,Irah H.; Donner,Zachary J.; Donner,Jason J., System and method for reallocating and/or upgrading and/or selling tickets, other even admittance means, goods and/or services.
Hunter, Charles Eric; Ballou, Jr., Bernard L.; Summer, Robert D.; Sparks, Kelly C.; Sykes, Ollin B.; Hebrank, John H., System and method permitting customers to order products from multiple participating merchants.
Merrill William E. (Houston TX) Rhebergen John A. (Houston TX) Delgado Robert (Houston TX), System for displaying selected assembly-facility seating views.
Challa, Nagesh; Gobburu, Venkata T., System, method and apparatus for communicating information between a mobile communications device and a bar code reader.
McKenna William J. (Barrington IL) Silvers Kenneth W. (Frankfort IL) Nickerson Rand B. (Scarborough CAX) Welsh Russell J. (Toronto NJ CAX) Walker Harold R. (Edison NJ) Cullity Joseph A. (Jersey City , Television and market research data collection system and method.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.