A method includes receiving a result of a benchmark leak detection test for a pressure system and determining whether the result indicates that a leak is present in the pressure system. In response to the result of the benchmark leak detection test indicating that a leak is not present in the pressu
A method includes receiving a result of a benchmark leak detection test for a pressure system and determining whether the result indicates that a leak is present in the pressure system. In response to the result of the benchmark leak detection test indicating that a leak is not present in the pressure system, the method includes performing a subsequent leak detection test for the pressure system, comparing a result of the subsequent leak detection test to the result of the benchmark leak detection test, and determining, based on the comparison, whether the subsequent leak detection test indicates that a leak is not present in the pressure system. A time to determine whether a leak is not present based on the comparison is less than a time to determine whether a leak is not present based on the benchmark leak detection test.
대표청구항▼
1. A method for testing a pressure system, comprising: receiving data from a pressure sensor, the data indicative of a first pressure of the pressure system at a first time and a second pressure of the pressure system at a second time;generating a pass/fail indication as a result of whether a percen
1. A method for testing a pressure system, comprising: receiving data from a pressure sensor, the data indicative of a first pressure of the pressure system at a first time and a second pressure of the pressure system at a second time;generating a pass/fail indication as a result of whether a percentage change in pressure from the first pressure to the second pressure is below a threshold; andphysically manipulating a component of the pressure system in response to the pass/fail indication. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the pass/fail indication comprises an indication on a graphical output of a failure or that a leak is present as a result of the percentage change in pressure from the first pressure to the second pressure being above the threshold. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the pass/fail indication comprises an indication on a graphical output of a pass or that a leak is not present as a result of the percentage change in pressure from the first pressure to the second pressure being below the threshold. 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a user input and, as a result, beginning a test of the pressure system. 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving data from a pump indicative of a flow rate of the pump and, as a result, beginning a test of the pressure system. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the pressure system comprises a blowout preventer. 7. A method for testing a pressure system, comprising: receiving data from a pressure sensor, the data indicative of a first pressure of the pressure system at a first time and a second pressure of the pressure system at a second time, wherein a physical configuration of the pressure system between the first and second times is static;generating an indication of a test outcome as a result of whether a leak detection value comprising a ratio of the first pressure and the second pressure is below a threshold, andphysically adjusting a component of the pressure system in response to the indication of the test outcome. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the test outcome comprises an indication on a graphical output of a failure or that a leak is present as a result of the leak detection value being above the threshold. 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the test outcome comprises an indication on a graphical output of a pass or that a leak is not present as a result of the leak detection value being below the threshold. 10. The method of claim 7, further comprising receiving a user input and, as a result, beginning a test of the pressure system. 11. The method of claim 7, further comprising receiving data from a pump indicative of a flow rate of the pump and, as a result, beginning a test of the pressure system. 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the pressure system comprises a blowout preventer. 13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive data from a pressure sensor indicative of a first pressure of a pressure system at a first time and a second pressure of the pressure system at a second time;generate a pass/fail indication as a result of whether a percentage change in pressure from the first pressure to the second pressure is below a threshold; andcause a component of the pressure system to be physically manipulated based on the pass/fail indication. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 wherein the pass/fail indication comprises an indication on a graphical output of a failure or that a leak is present as a result of the percentage change in pressure from the first pressure to the second pressure being above the threshold. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 wherein the pass/fail indication comprises an indication on a graphical output of a pass or that a leak is not present as a result of the percentage change in pressure from the first pressure to the second pressure being below the threshold. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to receive a user input and, as a result, begin a test of the pressure system. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to receive data from a pump indicative of a flow rate of the pump and, as a result, begin a test of the pressure system. 18. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive data from a pressure sensor indicative of a first pressure of the pressure system at a first time and a second pressure of the pressure system at a second time, wherein a physical configuration of the pressure system is static between the first and second times;generate an indication of a test outcome as a result of whether a leak detection value comprising a ratio of the first pressure and the second pressure is below a threshold; andcause a component of the pressure system to be physically adjusted in response to the indication of the test outcome. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 wherein the test outcome comprises an indication on a graphical output of a failure or that a leak is present as a result of the leak detection value being above the threshold. 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 wherein the test outcome comprises an indication on a graphical output of a pass or that a leak is not present as a result of the leak detection value being below the threshold. 21. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to receive a user input and, as a result, begin a test of the pressure system. 22. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to receive data from a pump indicative of a flow rate of the pump and, as a result, begin a test of the pressure system.
Balschat, Klaus; Ender, Helmuth; Gagel, Alfred; Spickermann, Reiner, Method and device for detecting a leakage in a fluid system of a blood treatment apparatus.
Maresca ; Jr. Joseph W. (Sunnyvale CA) Starr James W. (Bound Brook NJ) Wilson Christopher P. (La Honda CA), Methods for detection of leaks in pressurized pipeline systems.
Maresca ; Jr. Joseph W. (Sunnyvale CA) Starr James W. (Bound Brook NJ) Wilson Christopher (La Honda CA), Methods for measuring flow rates to detect leaks.
McGregor,Malcolm D.; Gilbert,Gregory N.; Proett,Mark A.; Fogal,James M.; Welshans,David; Gray,Glenn C.; Simeonov,Svetozar; Marsh,Laban M.; Beique,Jean Michel; Stone,James E., Methods for using a formation tester.
Maresca ; Jr. Joseph W. (Sunnyvale CA) Starr James W. (Bound Brook NJ) Wilson Christopher P. (La Honda CA), Positive displacement pump apparatus and methods for detection of leaks in pressurized pipeline systems.
Kahn Alan R. (Madison WI) Clark Kenneth R. (Cottage Grove WI) Bahr Dennis E. (Middleton WI), Pressure monitoring and leak detection method and apparatus.
Makel Darby B. (Sacramento CA) Jansa Earl D. (Shingle Springs CA) Cahill Daniel V. (Fair Oaks CA) Bickmore Timothy W. (Sacramento CA), Remotely controllable LNG field station management system and method.
Maresca ; Jr. Joseph W. (Sunnyvale CA) Starr James W. (Bound Brook NJ) Wilson Christopher P. (La Honda CA), Temperature compensated methods for detection of leaks in pressurized pipeline systems using gas controlled apparatus.
Maresca ; Jr. Joseph W. (Sunnyvale CA) Starr James W. (Bound Brook NJ) Wilson Christopher P. (La Honda CA), Temperature compensated methods for detection of leaks in pressurized pipeline systems using piston displacement apparat.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.