$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

계시와 현존 - 계시의 매개에 대한 바르트의 변증법적 유비론

Revelation and Presence: Barth’s Dialectical, Analogical Understanding of the Mediation of Revelation

장신논단 no.40 , 2011년, pp.209 - 232   http://dx.doi.org/10.15757/kpjt.2011..40.009009
박형국
초록

This paper is an exploration of Barth’s dialectical, analogical understanding of the mediation of revelation. According to Barth’s understanding of revelation, the Triune God reveals Himself in terms of giving Himself as an object to the creaturely medium.Barth argues that the reality of the Triune God bears a dialectical, analogical relation to such creaturely medium. In Barth’s dialectical, analogical understanding of the mediation of revelation, we find both an explicit meaning and an implicit one with regard to the role of the creaturely medium.Its explicit meaning is that in Barth’s dialectical, analogical understanding of the medium of revelation, the medium plays a role of the thick shield which protects the religious self’s domestication of God’s mystery and difference. This amounts to the passive role. Furthermore, we argue that in Barth’s analogical, dialectical understanding of the mediation of revelation, the mediation of human senses, perception or conception, and language or signs plays a very active role. Thus, we assert that such an emphasis on the mediation of revelation works for the encouragement of human freedom and responsibility. Such an understanding seems to provide the opportunity to rethink a certain stereotyped criticism against Barth’s theology, that is, Barth’s theology too much emphasizes divine transcendence so as to eclipse or reduce human freedom and responsibility.To support such an argument, we try to explicate Barth’s shift from what Barth calls “religion” to “the Word of God” from the perspective of the mediation of revelation.Such a perspective discloses that Barth’s transition is the journey from the mediation of intuition and self-consciousness to the mediation of senses, concepts, and language or signs. In this respect, Barth moves to the direction to stress the thicker mediation of revelation which means the emphasis of human hermeneutical and responsible activity in the event of revelation. However, by pointing to the radical limitation of human senses, concepts and language or signs as the medium of revelation, Barth’s analogical,dialectical understanding seems to offer the space for invoking the operation of God’s grace through the mediate activity of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. Therefore,Barth’s analogical, dialectical doctrine of revelation works for the co-emphasis of both the activity of divine grace through the mediate action of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit and human freedom and responsibility through the encouragement of the activity of the mediation of human senses, concepts, and language or signs.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • 원문 PDF 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일