Locationtracking Electronic surveillance system was recently introduced as an effective means of controlling certain criminal offenders. The law provides that criminals be required to be put an electronic surveillance device on their ankle so that they can be determined of their whereabouts and if they travel outside the permitted area an alarm will sound off. Such an electronic surveillance system goes beyond an introduction of a new criminal control system and gives a meaning that a new criminal control system overall has been established. Such an electronic surveillance system raises concern about violation of civil liberty and risk of double jeopardy, and since it deals with only certain types of criminal offenders there is an issue of infringement of equal rights.It is reasonable that the legal personality of attachment of electronic monitoring device should be regarded as secure disposal. In addition, if the retroactive effects of the attachment of electronic monitoring device are recognized, more reliable, rigorous and objective assessment of specific criminal with high risk of recidivism should be assumed. In order to judge the attachment of electronic monitoring device professionally and objectively, the configuration of depth certification committee of experts such as judges, psychiatrists, criminal psychology expert in the expiration point of prison term. At that time, it should be that a wearer can be took part in the depth certification committee so he can stand for his position about the attachment of electronic monitoring device enough. And the attachment of electronic monitoring device method and the attachment period should be differentiated by synthesizing the seriousness of recidivism risk, opinion of experts. The current specific crimes include sexual crimes, juvenile crime, kidnapping, murder crime etc. but promoting expansions of high risk of future criminal recidivism are being driven. Therefore as the issue of retroactive, exploring the policy options which can derive the national consensus are urgent.
Location tracking Electronic surveillance system was recently introduced as an effective means of controlling certain criminal offenders. The law provides that criminals be required to be put an electronic surveillance device on their ankle so that they can be determined of their whereabouts and if they travel outside the permitted area an alarm will sound off. Such an electronic surveillance system goes beyond an introduction of a new criminal control system and gives a meaning that a new criminal control system overall has been established. Such an electronic surveillance system raises concern about violation of civil liberty and risk of double jeopardy, and since it deals with only certain types of criminal offenders there is an issue of infringement of equal rights.It is reasonable that the legal personality of attachment of electronic monitoring device should be regarded as secure disposal. In addition, if the retroactive effects of the attachment of electronic monitoring device are recognized, more reliable, rigorous and objective assessment of specific criminal with high risk of recidivism should be assumed. In order to judge the attachment of electronic monitoring device professionally and objectively, the configuration of depth certification committee of experts such as judges, psychiatrists, criminal psychology expert in the expiration point of prison term. At that time, it should be that a wearer can be took part in the depth certification committee so he can stand for his position about the attachment of electronic monitoring device enough. And the attachment of electronic monitoring device method and the attachment period should be differentiated by synthesizing the seriousness of recidivism risk, opinion of experts. The current specific crimes include sexual crimes, juvenile crime, kidnapping, murder crime etc. but promoting expansions of high risk of future criminal recidivism are being driven. Therefore as the issue of retroactive, exploring the policy options which can derive the national consensus are urgent.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.