$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

해상운송인의 불법행위책임에 관한 고찰

A Review on Liability in Tort of Sea Carrier under Carriage Contract of Goods by Sea

국제상학 v.29 no.4 , 2014년, pp.53 - 68   http://dx.doi.org/10.18104/kaic.29.4.201412.53
김선옥
초록

Purpose : Where performance of obligations under a contract of carriage is delegated toemployees, agents or a sub-contractors, who are third parties to contract, from contractedcarriers, the shipper may ignore the provisions of the contract and sue them directly in tortwhere the loss or damage to cargo resulted from their negligence. In this case, the thirdparties can not rely on the defences clause in the bill of lading because they are not partiesto the contract of carriage. What is needed by the shipping market is an efficient and fairsystem, which reasonably respects the contractual allocation of risk and prohibits suits againstemployees or agents of the carrier for the same damage. This paper is to review the reasoningthat the third parties can rely on the protection afforded by the terms of the contract. Research design, data, methodology : Research methodology adopted in this paper isthe qualitative approach as it is to interpret legal principles and provisions of theinternational and domestic regulation on liability in tort and to apply them to the actualbusiness fields, especially focusing on carriage contract, through the case study. Results : If the third parties could be sued successfully for negligence without anyprotection from the bill of lading, this would enable the cargo interests to sueregardless of the carrier's protection under the Hague-Visby Rules. Such results areundesirable for various reasons, considering the commercial reality, policy reasons withallocation of risk during carriage and good faith. Conclusions : It is found that, when faced with privity doctrine, the courts haverightly tried to extend the protection clauses in carriage contract to third persons onthe basis of considerable ingenuity in devising a variety of reasons, such as commercialreality, policy reasons and good faith.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • 원문 PDF 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일