$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

과정 중심 문제 해결 보고서(IPDR)와 크로스체킹(Cross-checking) 기반 번역교수법 고찰

Analysis of two useful translation teaching methods based on IPDR and cross-checking.

통역과 번역 v.17 no.1 , 2015년, pp.1 - 38  
김대영
초록

The aim of this study is to analyze two useful educational tools intranslation course for undergraduate level students in Korea. Accordingto many scholars, the translation courses in Korea are result- andprofessor-oriented, often relying on the translation output of a professor. However, many scholars increasingly voice that the translation coursesneed to be student-and process-oriented. Based on the result of thesurvey of Kim(2013), we have supposed that IPDR(Integrated Problemand Decision Reporting) and Peer review, cross-checking programwhich is done in pairs, were the most efficient tools to change thelecturing method from the result- and professor– oriented teachingmethod to the student- and process- oriented teaching method whichultimately leads to progression in students’ translation competence. Consequently, the aim of this study is to analyze the educational valueof these two useful educational tools in translation course forundergraduate level students. Class observation and survey resultsindicate that both tools have allowed students to increase their various translation competencies, leading to effectiveness in conducting studentandprocess-oriented translation training by self –evaluation,self-motivated learning and mutual evaluation by pairs. Despite manymerits, it has been identified that IPDR and cross-checkingmethodology needs to be improved in the following areas; professor’sability to effectively educate students to learn IPDR, simplification ofprocess to address time-consuming cross-check methodology, adjustingthe frequency of IPDR by reflecting the requests from students,developing an evaluation tool for effective cross-checking methodology,and building credibility and consistency in cross-checking. Once theseissues are resolved, these two tools are expected to present significanteducational value.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일