$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

China’s Policy on Forcibly Repatriating North Korean Defectors - China's North Korean Defectors Policy Analysis through Comparison between Cases in China and Thailand

China’s Policy on Forcibly Repatriating North Korean Defectors - China's North Korean Defectors Policy Analysis through Comparison between Cases in China and Thailand -

중국법연구 v.26 , 2016년, pp.291 - 312   http://dx.doi.org/10.22415/clr.2016.26..011
전수미
초록

China ratified the United Nations Convention on the Status of Refugees(1951) and its amending Protocol(1967) in September 1982. However Chinese authorities have considered North Korean refugees as “economic migrant” until now, so forcibly repatriated to North Korea. But Thai authorities send defectors to South Korea in cooperation with South Korean authorities and Chinese authorities. The first reason that Thailand can obey the principle of non-refoulement is, that the relations between South Korea and Thailand is more beneficial than those between North Korea and Thailand. The second reason is, that it does not run counter to Thailand own security. If China intrudes on matters about North Korean defectors like case of Uighurs, Thailand will forcibly repatriate them for its own security and survival. In case of China’s accepting North Korean defectors, the problem ― the internal control of specific ethnic race, Chosun race, becomes difficult for Chinese authorities ― comes up. Besides accepting of defectors can promote large exodus and it will be economic bomb to China. Furthermore, it can be danger to confront militarily and politically on the border of USA and China. For the reason, although China’s trade volume with South Korea is 4th largest, China does not reflect the position of South Korea about North Korean defectors using the economic dominance according to South Korean export-oriented economic policy. Eventually, China violates treaties and international laws and submits to all criticism for its own political and economic stability.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일