$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

An Analysis of the Korean Competition Law Regarding Collective Dominance: A Comparative Perspective

An Analysis of the Korean Competition Law Regarding Collective Dominance: A Comparative Perspective

법학연구 v.49 , 2016년, pp.287 - 312  
최요섭
초록

One of the important objectives of competition law is to prevent anti-competitive effects arising from agreements or abusive conducts by monopolies or oligopolies. In some jurisdictions, a competition rule regarding collective dominance is a useful legal technique to counteract the abuse of oligopolistic market dominance; such a rule is relatively popular in the EU. Legal provisions regarding collective dominance which are, in effect, similar to the EU rule on collective dominance also exist in Korea. In contrast to the EU, the relevant case law addressing collective dominance has not developed significantly in Korea. One of the main reasons for the lack of case law in Korea was the failure of the first collective dominance case, the so-called BC Card judgment in 2005. Since the courts’ judgments on collective dominance, there has been no challenge against abuses by oligopolistic or collectively dominant undertakings, although the Korean competition act provides a relevant provision. Therefore, this article aims to discuss the Korean legal provision regarding collective dominance through a comparative study. In addition, it suggests proposals for further development of the implementation of the Korean competition act to address collective dominance. In effect, there are a number of Korean works on this issue; however, it is time for another review of the overall problem with the relevant case law and for improvement in the application of the law. In conclusion, although there have been a number of failures in the courtroom in important competition law cases, the Korean competition agency needs to enthusiastically implement competition law by developing the necessary criteria and tests for scrutiny, which will eventually be tested in the courts and settled as the assessment standards.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • 원문 PDF 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일