잇솔질, 양치액 사용, 껌씹기 등이 구취의 감소에 미치는 영향을 연구하고자 전남대학교 재학생으로서 비인후부질환과 구취 발생과 관련된 전신질환에 이환되지 아니하고, 정상이거나 경도의 치은염과 치아우식증 보다 심하지 않은 구강내 비정상 상태를 가지는, 22세에서 28세까지의 ...
잇솔질, 양치액 사용, 껌씹기 등이 구취의 감소에 미치는 영향을 연구하고자 전남대학교 재학생으로서 비인후부질환과 구취 발생과 관련된 전신질환에 이환되지 아니하고, 정상이거나 경도의 치은염과 치아우식증 보다 심하지 않은 구강내 비정상 상태를 가지는, 22세에서 28세까지의 남여 84명 (남자 60명, 여자 24명)을 대상으로 구취를 발생시키는 주요 성분인 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도를 점심식사 전후와 잇솔질, 양치액, 껌을 사용한 구취제거법을 시행한 3시간 후에 측정하여 구취제거법을 시행하지 않은 대조군과 비교분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 구강내 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도는 점심식사전이 1.79ppm, 점심식사후는 2.02ppm으로, 점심식사후 12.9% 증가하였다. 2. 각 구취제거법 시행 3시간후 구강내 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도는 잇솔질군이 0.61ppm, 양치액 사용군은 1.15ppm, 껌씹기군은 1.64ppm으로서, 점심식사 직후에 비해 잇솔질군은 69.5%, 양치액 사용군은 43.8%, 껌씹기군은 18.4% 감소하였고, 대조군은 1.92ppm으로 5.4% 감소하였으며, 잇솔질군과 양치액 사용군에서 유의한 감소를 나타내었다(P<0.05). 3. 구취제거법 사용후 구강내 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도는 잇솔질군은 껌씹기군과 대조군에 비해 유의한 차이를 나타내었고, 양치액 사용군은 대조군과 유의한 차이를 나타내었다(P<0.05). 이상과 같은 결과에 따라 잇솔질, 양치액 사용, 껌씹기 중 잇솔질과 양치액 사용이 구취를 감소 시키는데 효과적이었다.
잇솔질, 양치액 사용, 껌씹기 등이 구취의 감소에 미치는 영향을 연구하고자 전남대학교 재학생으로서 비인후부질환과 구취 발생과 관련된 전신질환에 이환되지 아니하고, 정상이거나 경도의 치은염과 치아우식증 보다 심하지 않은 구강내 비정상 상태를 가지는, 22세에서 28세까지의 남여 84명 (남자 60명, 여자 24명)을 대상으로 구취를 발생시키는 주요 성분인 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도를 점심식사 전후와 잇솔질, 양치액, 껌을 사용한 구취제거법을 시행한 3시간 후에 측정하여 구취제거법을 시행하지 않은 대조군과 비교분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 구강내 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도는 점심식사전이 1.79ppm, 점심식사후는 2.02ppm으로, 점심식사후 12.9% 증가하였다. 2. 각 구취제거법 시행 3시간후 구강내 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도는 잇솔질군이 0.61ppm, 양치액 사용군은 1.15ppm, 껌씹기군은 1.64ppm으로서, 점심식사 직후에 비해 잇솔질군은 69.5%, 양치액 사용군은 43.8%, 껌씹기군은 18.4% 감소하였고, 대조군은 1.92ppm으로 5.4% 감소하였으며, 잇솔질군과 양치액 사용군에서 유의한 감소를 나타내었다(P<0.05). 3. 구취제거법 사용후 구강내 휘발성 메틸머캅탄의 농도는 잇솔질군은 껌씹기군과 대조군에 비해 유의한 차이를 나타내었고, 양치액 사용군은 대조군과 유의한 차이를 나타내었다(P<0.05). 이상과 같은 결과에 따라 잇솔질, 양치액 사용, 껌씹기 중 잇솔질과 양치액 사용이 구취를 감소 시키는데 효과적이었다.
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of tooth brushing, mouth gargling and gum chewing in reducing halitosis, 84 individuals ranging in age from 22 to 28 years old were examined. These individuals had no gross oral abnormalities, other than mild gingival inflammation, dental caries, nasopharyngeal...
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of tooth brushing, mouth gargling and gum chewing in reducing halitosis, 84 individuals ranging in age from 22 to 28 years old were examined. These individuals had no gross oral abnormalities, other than mild gingival inflammation, dental caries, nasopharyngeal disorder, or systemic diseases that were associated with halitosis. They were divided into a tooth brushing group, a mouth gargling group, a gum chewing group and a control group that did not use any halitosis removing method. Each of the groups included 21 persons. B.B. Checker (Tokuyama Soda Co., LTD., Japan) was used to measure the concentrations of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan of each group. The concentrations of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan were measured before and after lunch, and after removing halitosis by tooth brushing, mouth gargling and gum chewing. The obtained results were as follows; 1. The average concentration of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan before lunch was 1.79ppm and after lunch it was 2.02ppm, an increase of 12.9%. 2. In the tooth brushing group the average concentration of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan was 0.61ppm, in the mouth gargling group it was 1.15ppm, in the gum chewing group it was 1.64ppm and in the control group it was 1.92ppm. It decreased 69.5% in the tooth brushing group, 43.8% in the mouth gargling group, 18.4% in the gum chewing group and 5.4% in the control group(P<0.05). 3. There were significant differences between the tooth brushing and control group, tooth brushing and gum chewing group and between mouth gargling and control group in concentrations of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan after using the halitosis removing methods(P<0.05). According to the above results, tooth brushing and mouth gargling are effective ways to reduce halitosis.
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of tooth brushing, mouth gargling and gum chewing in reducing halitosis, 84 individuals ranging in age from 22 to 28 years old were examined. These individuals had no gross oral abnormalities, other than mild gingival inflammation, dental caries, nasopharyngeal disorder, or systemic diseases that were associated with halitosis. They were divided into a tooth brushing group, a mouth gargling group, a gum chewing group and a control group that did not use any halitosis removing method. Each of the groups included 21 persons. B.B. Checker (Tokuyama Soda Co., LTD., Japan) was used to measure the concentrations of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan of each group. The concentrations of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan were measured before and after lunch, and after removing halitosis by tooth brushing, mouth gargling and gum chewing. The obtained results were as follows; 1. The average concentration of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan before lunch was 1.79ppm and after lunch it was 2.02ppm, an increase of 12.9%. 2. In the tooth brushing group the average concentration of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan was 0.61ppm, in the mouth gargling group it was 1.15ppm, in the gum chewing group it was 1.64ppm and in the control group it was 1.92ppm. It decreased 69.5% in the tooth brushing group, 43.8% in the mouth gargling group, 18.4% in the gum chewing group and 5.4% in the control group(P<0.05). 3. There were significant differences between the tooth brushing and control group, tooth brushing and gum chewing group and between mouth gargling and control group in concentrations of intraoral volatile methyl mercaptan after using the halitosis removing methods(P<0.05). According to the above results, tooth brushing and mouth gargling are effective ways to reduce halitosis.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.