The main point of this study is on the understanding of human being through Sigmund Freud's and Blaise Pascal's understanding of religion. On the base of that study, this thesis searches for a possible model of the dialogue between theology and psychoanalysis. I have developed this study as follows....
The main point of this study is on the understanding of human being through Sigmund Freud's and Blaise Pascal's understanding of religion. On the base of that study, this thesis searches for a possible model of the dialogue between theology and psychoanalysis. I have developed this study as follows. In the first part, I described Freud's psychoanalytical understanding of human being. According to Freud, the mental dimension of human being is divided into the two realms, the consciousness and the unconscious. He thought that the unconscious world is the source of the human life. Later, this dimension is changed into the three realms, id, ego and super-ego. Freud explains that the origin of the religion is caused by the early childhood traumatic experience of life in relation to father, oedipus complex. According to Freud, religion is the projection the early experience of father. I articulated this point in the first chapter. In the second part, this study clarified Pascal's understanding of human being in relation to religion. According to Pascal, the essential human problem, original sin, is solved only through the grace of Jesus Christ. In the third part, this thesis compared Freud's understanding of human being with Pascal's. There are some similarities between them. First, although Freud and Pascal lived in different times, there were similar situations. Freud showed the oppressed unconscious world. Likewise Pascal showed the human nature that is restrained by the authority of religion. Second, Freud and Pascal understood the essential dimension of human being through the analysis of religion. They both thought over the dank side of human beings, the original sin and the unconscious. Freud found the oppressed desires in the unconscious world. Pascal thought that human being should accept the fragility and corruption of the human. The differences between Freud and Pascal are as follows. First, they had different method of study. Freud though of human reason as a ultimate reference. But Pascal needed the grace of God. Second, they had different opinion on religion. Freud stressed the negative functions of religion. He thought that religion gave people anxiety, guiltness and even neuroses. However Pascal emphasized the positive functions of religion, inspiration, creativity, liberation and so on. Through my comparative study, I could discover three problems in Freud's and Pascal's human understandings in contemporary society. First, Freud's study of human being revealed only the patriarchal understanding of human being. Second, he regarded religion as the result of regressed human life. Third, on the other hand, Pascal's understanding of human being did not concern much about the historical, cultural and social situation of religious pluralism.
The main point of this study is on the understanding of human being through Sigmund Freud's and Blaise Pascal's understanding of religion. On the base of that study, this thesis searches for a possible model of the dialogue between theology and psychoanalysis. I have developed this study as follows. In the first part, I described Freud's psychoanalytical understanding of human being. According to Freud, the mental dimension of human being is divided into the two realms, the consciousness and the unconscious. He thought that the unconscious world is the source of the human life. Later, this dimension is changed into the three realms, id, ego and super-ego. Freud explains that the origin of the religion is caused by the early childhood traumatic experience of life in relation to father, oedipus complex. According to Freud, religion is the projection the early experience of father. I articulated this point in the first chapter. In the second part, this study clarified Pascal's understanding of human being in relation to religion. According to Pascal, the essential human problem, original sin, is solved only through the grace of Jesus Christ. In the third part, this thesis compared Freud's understanding of human being with Pascal's. There are some similarities between them. First, although Freud and Pascal lived in different times, there were similar situations. Freud showed the oppressed unconscious world. Likewise Pascal showed the human nature that is restrained by the authority of religion. Second, Freud and Pascal understood the essential dimension of human being through the analysis of religion. They both thought over the dank side of human beings, the original sin and the unconscious. Freud found the oppressed desires in the unconscious world. Pascal thought that human being should accept the fragility and corruption of the human. The differences between Freud and Pascal are as follows. First, they had different method of study. Freud though of human reason as a ultimate reference. But Pascal needed the grace of God. Second, they had different opinion on religion. Freud stressed the negative functions of religion. He thought that religion gave people anxiety, guiltness and even neuroses. However Pascal emphasized the positive functions of religion, inspiration, creativity, liberation and so on. Through my comparative study, I could discover three problems in Freud's and Pascal's human understandings in contemporary society. First, Freud's study of human being revealed only the patriarchal understanding of human being. Second, he regarded religion as the result of regressed human life. Third, on the other hand, Pascal's understanding of human being did not concern much about the historical, cultural and social situation of religious pluralism.
주제어
#인간관 지그문트 프로이트 블레즈 파스칼 종교 이해
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.