The purpose of this thesis produce that Condemnation of Nestorius is reflected politic connection of church that time. So I will consider his Christology and progress of Ephesus Council. This thesis is consist of seven part. In the first chapter, the aims, scope and method of this are delineated. Al...
The purpose of this thesis produce that Condemnation of Nestorius is reflected politic connection of church that time. So I will consider his Christology and progress of Ephesus Council. This thesis is consist of seven part. In the first chapter, the aims, scope and method of this are delineated. Also recent discussions of Nestorius's assessment are introduced. New studies about Nestorius began only in the seventeenth century. With the end of the nineteenth and the early of the twentieth century a new phase in the study of Nestorius begins. This is concerned with two fields of research: One is the editions of the text(F. Loofs, Luise Abramowski, Paul Bedjan, F. Nau), the other is the new description of Nestorius' teaching(J. B. Bethune-Baker, J. B. Junglas, L. Rucker). The second chapter deals with the christology until four century. This chapter consist of three section of the christology of the second century, christology of Alexandria and Antioch. In the third chapter, Writer look into the background of Nestorius' christology. Diodore of Tarsus and Theodore of Mopsuestia gave Nestorius theological influence. The fourth chapter, we can review Nestorius' Christology. His thought is not different from orthodox christology. Actually, those days people have misunderstanding about Nestorius' thought. The fifth chapter, I view Nestorius and the council of Ephesus(431). In this chapter, I introduce Cyril's wrong politic plan. Nestorius is condemned by His politic power. In conclusion, we find that Nestorius' condemnation based upon not only politic understanding connection, but also social, theological, liturgic factors, geographical positon. we need to have apostolic tradition, sufficient discussion of churches and bisops in theological controversy.
The purpose of this thesis produce that Condemnation of Nestorius is reflected politic connection of church that time. So I will consider his Christology and progress of Ephesus Council. This thesis is consist of seven part. In the first chapter, the aims, scope and method of this are delineated. Also recent discussions of Nestorius's assessment are introduced. New studies about Nestorius began only in the seventeenth century. With the end of the nineteenth and the early of the twentieth century a new phase in the study of Nestorius begins. This is concerned with two fields of research: One is the editions of the text(F. Loofs, Luise Abramowski, Paul Bedjan, F. Nau), the other is the new description of Nestorius' teaching(J. B. Bethune-Baker, J. B. Junglas, L. Rucker). The second chapter deals with the christology until four century. This chapter consist of three section of the christology of the second century, christology of Alexandria and Antioch. In the third chapter, Writer look into the background of Nestorius' christology. Diodore of Tarsus and Theodore of Mopsuestia gave Nestorius theological influence. The fourth chapter, we can review Nestorius' Christology. His thought is not different from orthodox christology. Actually, those days people have misunderstanding about Nestorius' thought. The fifth chapter, I view Nestorius and the council of Ephesus(431). In this chapter, I introduce Cyril's wrong politic plan. Nestorius is condemned by His politic power. In conclusion, we find that Nestorius' condemnation based upon not only politic understanding connection, but also social, theological, liturgic factors, geographical positon. we need to have apostolic tradition, sufficient discussion of churches and bisops in theological controversy.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.