The purpose of the thesis is to analyze the ambivalence of the national discourse that is revealed connecting with Japanese colonial discourse in Lee Guang-su's literatures. His national discourse wasn't subsumed by Japanese colonialism. That fulfilled its function as microscopic differences in the colonial discourse by means of diverse cultures in the colonized place. His national discourse was made up through repeating of the mimicry about Japanese imperialism. The aspect of the national discourse, however, was transfigured according to mutations in situation of circumstances with the change of the times on account of the colonial discourse in Japan couldn't be accord with the discourse in the colonized Chosun. When Japanese imperialism discourse was performed in the colony, it showed duplicate aspects. Spontaneously the performative discourse of colonized people showed the ambivalence that was transfigured and occurred a crack. Especially The Japan Empire had made changes their policy about colonized Chosun meeting the contemporary needs for their profits. The national discourse of colonized people, therefore, could not help being changed. Lee Guang-su's national discourse showed the ambivalence of "preparation argument" monopolizing the discourse of civilization that was the colonial policy early in colonized era in the 1910's. It was revealed to duplicity of "the assimilative policy" and "the civilized argument" by Japan Empire. The performative phase of the civilized discourse in the Lee Guang-su's works didn't just stay the place where pursue to "the theory of the social evolution" and "the civilization argument" of Japan Empire. It showed the differences from the various cultures in the colonized place. Besides, the discourse of the enlightenment through “Chung(情)” function as an new meaningful discourse. His first full-lenth novel, was made in ...
The purpose of the thesis is to analyze the ambivalence of the national discourse that is revealed connecting with Japanese colonial discourse in Lee Guang-su's literatures. His national discourse wasn't subsumed by Japanese colonialism. That fulfilled its function as microscopic differences in the colonial discourse by means of diverse cultures in the colonized place. His national discourse was made up through repeating of the mimicry about Japanese imperialism. The aspect of the national discourse, however, was transfigured according to mutations in situation of circumstances with the change of the times on account of the colonial discourse in Japan couldn't be accord with the discourse in the colonized Chosun. When Japanese imperialism discourse was performed in the colony, it showed duplicate aspects. Spontaneously the performative discourse of colonized people showed the ambivalence that was transfigured and occurred a crack. Especially The Japan Empire had made changes their policy about colonized Chosun meeting the contemporary needs for their profits. The national discourse of colonized people, therefore, could not help being changed. Lee Guang-su's national discourse showed the ambivalence of "preparation argument" monopolizing the discourse of civilization that was the colonial policy early in colonized era in the 1910's. It was revealed to duplicity of "the assimilative policy" and "the civilized argument" by Japan Empire. The performative phase of the civilized discourse in the Lee Guang-su's works didn't just stay the place where pursue to "the theory of the social evolution" and "the civilization argument" of Japan Empire. It showed the differences from the various cultures in the colonized place. Besides, the discourse of the enlightenment through “Chung(情)” function as an new meaningful discourse. His first full-lenth novel, was made in narrative that Hyung-shik have trouble between Young-che who was a cord of symbol of the savage and Sun-hyung who represented as the cord of the civilization. The author slided the narrative plot down in the process of the narrative that showed differences from colonial discourse through Young-che who was denied as a lack of the civilization and other characters. The narrative in Lee Guang-su's short novels in 1910's imitated "the civilization argument". Concurrently it showed gliding in the language process. It is the aspect of Hybridities that was produced by difference from in-between Lee Guang-su's intentional mimicry to colonial discourse. Lee Guang-su's national discourse in 1920's and 1930's was formed so called under the Culture policy of Japan Empire. The colonial discourse revealed an irony that strengthened rigid disciplines under the good name of freeing of the culture in the colonized Chosun. His representative dissertation, written by Lee Guang-su in 1920's showed the aspect that regarded with Japanese colonial discourse. Although searching from the relation with published by (독립신문) at Shanghai city in China, the different figures were exposed in the process of the writing performance. Meanwhile, the meaning of "the multitude" in the cultural nationalism showed as the hybridity. His multitude nationalism was showed in ≪resuscitation≫(재생), ≪a leader≫(선도자), ≪the soil≫(흙), ≪Sangbongi's home≫(상봉이네 집) in 1920's. His multitude were not social class characters but general farmers. The cultural nationalism formed from the viewpoint of organic nationalism in 1920's had an influence on the original nationalism in late 1930's. Japanese colonial discourse was based on, so called, the "Beyond Modernity" argument in 1940. Japanese Empire carried a conscription regime of colony Chosun into effect, so called, by the policy of "Huanminhwa"(to be national people in Japan) and "Naesunilche"(to be one between Japan and Chosun). The colonial discourse, however, could not help exposing the differences and the cracks because it had an ironic duplicity of itself in the colonial field. Lee Guang-su's acceped Japanese "Nasunilche"(to be one between Japan and Chosun) as an extension of the ethnic viewpoint, a base of the cultural nationalism. His works imitates the logic of the cooperation between Japan and Chosun by Japanese colonialsm in 1940's. The differences against Japanese colonial discourse had broken out in the narrative process of the articles, though. The colonial discourse as Japanese national literature were also written in Lee Guang-Su's novels. For example, ≪Indeed, sincere hearts meet each other≫(진정 마음이 만나서야 말로), ≪Their love≫(그들의 사랑) showed the emphasis that the policy of "Nasunilche"(Be one between Japan and Chosun) couldn't have been come true if Japanese people had not change their prejudice for Chosun people. Namely, the narrative of an enlightenment went into reverse. Further, ≪The fly≫(파리) should the aspect that the subject who had to be enlightened became a laughstock by showing the overreaction pursuing Japanese colonial discourse in the narrative process. The ambivalence of the national discourse in Lee Guang-su's literatures showed the process that his national discourse was recomposed to new discourse in modern literatures in colonized era. The national discourse was the activate hibridity related with a articulation and a clash in the colonized place. His national discourse showed the ambivalence relation with changed colonial discourse : the preparation argument in 1910's, the multitude nationalism in 1920's and 1930's, the original nationalism in 1940's. The opportunity of resistances in the colonized people can be passed over when the colonial discourse is analyzed by a definite form as of old. The difference as a resistance can analyze in the microscopic viewpoint in the colonized. It can go into operation not just as a cooperation, but as a opportunity looking for new meaning of the national discourse.
The purpose of the thesis is to analyze the ambivalence of the national discourse that is revealed connecting with Japanese colonial discourse in Lee Guang-su's literatures. His national discourse wasn't subsumed by Japanese colonialism. That fulfilled its function as microscopic differences in the colonial discourse by means of diverse cultures in the colonized place. His national discourse was made up through repeating of the mimicry about Japanese imperialism. The aspect of the national discourse, however, was transfigured according to mutations in situation of circumstances with the change of the times on account of the colonial discourse in Japan couldn't be accord with the discourse in the colonized Chosun. When Japanese imperialism discourse was performed in the colony, it showed duplicate aspects. Spontaneously the performative discourse of colonized people showed the ambivalence that was transfigured and occurred a crack. Especially The Japan Empire had made changes their policy about colonized Chosun meeting the contemporary needs for their profits. The national discourse of colonized people, therefore, could not help being changed. Lee Guang-su's national discourse showed the ambivalence of "preparation argument" monopolizing the discourse of civilization that was the colonial policy early in colonized era in the 1910's. It was revealed to duplicity of "the assimilative policy" and "the civilized argument" by Japan Empire. The performative phase of the civilized discourse in the Lee Guang-su's works didn't just stay the place where pursue to "the theory of the social evolution" and "the civilization argument" of Japan Empire. It showed the differences from the various cultures in the colonized place. Besides, the discourse of the enlightenment through “Chung(情)” function as an new meaningful discourse. His first full-lenth novel, was made in narrative that Hyung-shik have trouble between Young-che who was a cord of symbol of the savage and Sun-hyung who represented as the cord of the civilization. The author slided the narrative plot down in the process of the narrative that showed differences from colonial discourse through Young-che who was denied as a lack of the civilization and other characters. The narrative in Lee Guang-su's short novels in 1910's imitated "the civilization argument". Concurrently it showed gliding in the language process. It is the aspect of Hybridities that was produced by difference from in-between Lee Guang-su's intentional mimicry to colonial discourse. Lee Guang-su's national discourse in 1920's and 1930's was formed so called under the Culture policy of Japan Empire. The colonial discourse revealed an irony that strengthened rigid disciplines under the good name of freeing of the culture in the colonized Chosun. His representative dissertation, written by Lee Guang-su in 1920's showed the aspect that regarded with Japanese colonial discourse. Although searching from the relation with published by (독립신문) at Shanghai city in China, the different figures were exposed in the process of the writing performance. Meanwhile, the meaning of "the multitude" in the cultural nationalism showed as the hybridity. His multitude nationalism was showed in ≪resuscitation≫(재생), ≪a leader≫(선도자), ≪the soil≫(흙), ≪Sangbongi's home≫(상봉이네 집) in 1920's. His multitude were not social class characters but general farmers. The cultural nationalism formed from the viewpoint of organic nationalism in 1920's had an influence on the original nationalism in late 1930's. Japanese colonial discourse was based on, so called, the "Beyond Modernity" argument in 1940. Japanese Empire carried a conscription regime of colony Chosun into effect, so called, by the policy of "Huanminhwa"(to be national people in Japan) and "Naesunilche"(to be one between Japan and Chosun). The colonial discourse, however, could not help exposing the differences and the cracks because it had an ironic duplicity of itself in the colonial field. Lee Guang-su's acceped Japanese "Nasunilche"(to be one between Japan and Chosun) as an extension of the ethnic viewpoint, a base of the cultural nationalism. His works imitates the logic of the cooperation between Japan and Chosun by Japanese colonialsm in 1940's. The differences against Japanese colonial discourse had broken out in the narrative process of the articles, though. The colonial discourse as Japanese national literature were also written in Lee Guang-Su's novels. For example, ≪Indeed, sincere hearts meet each other≫(진정 마음이 만나서야 말로), ≪Their love≫(그들의 사랑) showed the emphasis that the policy of "Nasunilche"(Be one between Japan and Chosun) couldn't have been come true if Japanese people had not change their prejudice for Chosun people. Namely, the narrative of an enlightenment went into reverse. Further, ≪The fly≫(파리) should the aspect that the subject who had to be enlightened became a laughstock by showing the overreaction pursuing Japanese colonial discourse in the narrative process. The ambivalence of the national discourse in Lee Guang-su's literatures showed the process that his national discourse was recomposed to new discourse in modern literatures in colonized era. The national discourse was the activate hibridity related with a articulation and a clash in the colonized place. His national discourse showed the ambivalence relation with changed colonial discourse : the preparation argument in 1910's, the multitude nationalism in 1920's and 1930's, the original nationalism in 1940's. The opportunity of resistances in the colonized people can be passed over when the colonial discourse is analyzed by a definite form as of old. The difference as a resistance can analyze in the microscopic viewpoint in the colonized. It can go into operation not just as a cooperation, but as a opportunity looking for new meaning of the national discourse.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.