본 연구는 국내 17개 대학원의 미술치료 교과과정과 미국 7개 대학의 교과과정을 비교함으로서 양국 미술치료 교과과정 및 교육의 차이점을 간파하고 한국의 미술치료전공이 미래지향적인 교과과정을 개설할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 미술치료분야를 수학하고 있는 대학원생이나 이미 졸업하고 예술치료사로 활동하고 있는 전문 예술치료사들에게도 미술치료사가 되기 위하여 어떠한 교과과정이 요구되는가를 간파함으로서 개인별로 부족한 부분의 지식을 보충할 수 있을 것이다. 한국의 대학원 과정의 특성은 미술치료 관련과목이 미국에 비하여 적게 개설되어 있으며 전...
본 연구는 국내 17개 대학원의 미술치료 교과과정과 미국 7개 대학의 교과과정을 비교함으로서 양국 미술치료 교과과정 및 교육의 차이점을 간파하고 한국의 미술치료전공이 미래지향적인 교과과정을 개설할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 미술치료분야를 수학하고 있는 대학원생이나 이미 졸업하고 예술치료사로 활동하고 있는 전문 예술치료사들에게도 미술치료사가 되기 위하여 어떠한 교과과정이 요구되는가를 간파함으로서 개인별로 부족한 부분의 지식을 보충할 수 있을 것이다. 한국의 대학원 과정의 특성은 미술치료 관련과목이 미국에 비하여 적게 개설되어 있으며 전반적으로 30학점 미만을 운영하고 있어 미술치료사의 질적 향상에 새로운 교과과정과 교육제도의 개선이 시급한 상태이다. 최소 50학점 이상의 교과과정을 운영하여야 현실적으로 미술치료사의 질적 향상을 추구할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 미국과 같이 기본적으로 미술실기과정을 12-18학점 이상 수강한 자와 12학점 이상의 심리학 과정을 학부에서 수강한 자로 입학자격을 규정지을 필요성이 있다. 그러나 현실적으로 입학자격을 미국과 같이 규정 하기에는 어려움이 많이 따르기 때문에 결국 대학원에 입학하여 심리학 과목과 미술실기 과목을 수학하여야 하기 때문에 학점수를 늘려야 할 것이다. 현행 30학점 정도로는 양질의 미술치료사를 양성하기에는 너무나 부족한 교과과정을 운영하고 있는 것이다. 한국의 대학원 과정이 학점도 미국의 대학원과정에 비하여 1/2 수준임에도 심리학이나 미술실기과정을 병행하여 수강하여야 하는 한국의 경우는 미술치료사의 자질이 많이 떨어져 있는 현실이다. 미술치료를 석사과정에서 수학하기 위하여 당연히 미술실기과정을 학부에서 수강한 자가 대학원에 입학하여 심리학과정을 병행하면서 미술치료사 양성과정을 수학할 수는 있지만 국내 대학원의 경우 미술대학 출신이 아닌 인문학 계열이나 사회복지 학사학위를 마치고 석사과정에 입학하여 미술치료사가 되는 경우가 많다. 결국 미술의 기본을 이해하지 못한 상태로 미술치료사 양성과정을 거쳐 미술치료사가 되는 악순환을 반복하고 있다. 그나마 대학원 과정에서의 수학과정은 체계적으로 진행한다고 볼 수 있지만 문제는 대학원외의 단기교육과정에서 양성되는 무자격자들이 미술치료사로 활동하고 있는 현실이다. 이 부분은 절대적으로 시급하게 국가 공인자격증 제도의 도입으로 정리되어 지기를 희망한다.
본 연구는 국내 17개 대학원의 미술치료 교과과정과 미국 7개 대학의 교과과정을 비교함으로서 양국 미술치료 교과과정 및 교육의 차이점을 간파하고 한국의 미술치료전공이 미래지향적인 교과과정을 개설할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 미술치료분야를 수학하고 있는 대학원생이나 이미 졸업하고 예술치료사로 활동하고 있는 전문 예술치료사들에게도 미술치료사가 되기 위하여 어떠한 교과과정이 요구되는가를 간파함으로서 개인별로 부족한 부분의 지식을 보충할 수 있을 것이다. 한국의 대학원 과정의 특성은 미술치료 관련과목이 미국에 비하여 적게 개설되어 있으며 전반적으로 30학점 미만을 운영하고 있어 미술치료사의 질적 향상에 새로운 교과과정과 교육제도의 개선이 시급한 상태이다. 최소 50학점 이상의 교과과정을 운영하여야 현실적으로 미술치료사의 질적 향상을 추구할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 미국과 같이 기본적으로 미술실기과정을 12-18학점 이상 수강한 자와 12학점 이상의 심리학 과정을 학부에서 수강한 자로 입학자격을 규정지을 필요성이 있다. 그러나 현실적으로 입학자격을 미국과 같이 규정 하기에는 어려움이 많이 따르기 때문에 결국 대학원에 입학하여 심리학 과목과 미술실기 과목을 수학하여야 하기 때문에 학점수를 늘려야 할 것이다. 현행 30학점 정도로는 양질의 미술치료사를 양성하기에는 너무나 부족한 교과과정을 운영하고 있는 것이다. 한국의 대학원 과정이 학점도 미국의 대학원과정에 비하여 1/2 수준임에도 심리학이나 미술실기과정을 병행하여 수강하여야 하는 한국의 경우는 미술치료사의 자질이 많이 떨어져 있는 현실이다. 미술치료를 석사과정에서 수학하기 위하여 당연히 미술실기과정을 학부에서 수강한 자가 대학원에 입학하여 심리학과정을 병행하면서 미술치료사 양성과정을 수학할 수는 있지만 국내 대학원의 경우 미술대학 출신이 아닌 인문학 계열이나 사회복지 학사학위를 마치고 석사과정에 입학하여 미술치료사가 되는 경우가 많다. 결국 미술의 기본을 이해하지 못한 상태로 미술치료사 양성과정을 거쳐 미술치료사가 되는 악순환을 반복하고 있다. 그나마 대학원 과정에서의 수학과정은 체계적으로 진행한다고 볼 수 있지만 문제는 대학원외의 단기교육과정에서 양성되는 무자격자들이 미술치료사로 활동하고 있는 현실이다. 이 부분은 절대적으로 시급하게 국가 공인자격증 제도의 도입으로 정리되어 지기를 희망한다.
The present study deals with a comparison of curricula for art therapy of 17 graduate schools in Korea and 7 universities in the USA with a view to identify the difference in the curricula as well as education for art therapy of both countries and, by thus, to help domestic institutions establish a ...
The present study deals with a comparison of curricula for art therapy of 17 graduate schools in Korea and 7 universities in the USA with a view to identify the difference in the curricula as well as education for art therapy of both countries and, by thus, to help domestic institutions establish a future-oriented curriculum for art therapy. This study will also do much for the graduate students who are currently studying art therapy as a major to find what is required of to become an art therapist and for the professional art therapists who are practicing art therapy upon finishing the graduate course to fill up their weakness that has come to forefront in their career. The graduate course for art therapy in Korea may be characterized by the fact that small number of subjects related to art therapy are set up at the graduate schools compared to those of the USA and they are providing less than 30 credits in general, which makes it urgent to introduce new curricula in a move to enhance competence of art therapists and improve the related educational systems. More than 50 credits at least should be available to ensure better qualification of art therapists in reality. Moreover, it is also necessary to stipulate the qualification for admittance to graduate schools to be furnished only to those who have completed and acquired basically more than 12-18 credits in the practice course of art and more than 12 credits in the course of psychology at college, as most universities and colleges do in the USA. Since, however, it is actually impossible to specify qualification for admittance in Korea as is done in the USA, it should be requested to increase the number of credits at graduate schools for those who have to take courses in psychology and art practice which they can't take at college. The current level of around 30 credits must be far behind from the requirements for training high-quality art therapists. Art therapists in the USA shall be regarded in fact as very superior to those of Korea who have to take courses in psychology as well as in practice at graduate schools in parallel with other subjects that are almost half in number of those in the USA. Although it is possible for those students who have completed the course of art practice at college to advance to graduate school to attend the class training art therapists in parallel with psychology, most students in Korea who have attained bachelor's degree at the college of humanity and social science, not at the fine arts college, take the master's degree program at graduate school to become art therapists. In other word, they become art therapists having just completed the training course for art therapists without understanding to fundamentals of fine arts, causing a vicious cycle eventually. The program for art therapy at graduate school may be considered to be systematically operated, to say the least, but the problem is that lots of people who have only been trained by the short-term courses at other than graduate schools and are therefore not qualified are actively engaged in practice in the name of art therapists. This, above all, should be rectified definitely and urgently by introducing the national qualification system for art therapists. It is encouraging to see that handicapped persons have come to greatly benefit from various policies including the activated boucher project that was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Surely, however, now is the time to take bold measures to straighten out the actual situation of Korea in which unqualified art therapists are actively practicing art therapy in the process of implementing the voucher project. It is also suggested to revise the curricular for art therapy in the master's degree program in Korea since the present study found that even those who have successfully completed mater's degree programs are far behind from being regarded as properly qualified for practicing art therapy in the field due to exceedingly short number of credits and clinical practice hours according to the curricula compared to those of the USA. In case of the USA, qualification for art therapy is imparted only to those who are awarded with mater's degree for art therapy from 27 universities that have been accredited by the American Society of Art Therapy. Whereas, in Korea, there is no official organization yet recognized to provide qualification for art therapy but several academic societies and private organizations are doing the job loosely. The data concerning the license for art therapy issued by 4 domestic academic societies and regulations of ATR qualification of the USA are enclosed in this study in an attempt to make them serve as basic data for comparison and review before introducing a national qualification system for art therapists in Korea.
The present study deals with a comparison of curricula for art therapy of 17 graduate schools in Korea and 7 universities in the USA with a view to identify the difference in the curricula as well as education for art therapy of both countries and, by thus, to help domestic institutions establish a future-oriented curriculum for art therapy. This study will also do much for the graduate students who are currently studying art therapy as a major to find what is required of to become an art therapist and for the professional art therapists who are practicing art therapy upon finishing the graduate course to fill up their weakness that has come to forefront in their career. The graduate course for art therapy in Korea may be characterized by the fact that small number of subjects related to art therapy are set up at the graduate schools compared to those of the USA and they are providing less than 30 credits in general, which makes it urgent to introduce new curricula in a move to enhance competence of art therapists and improve the related educational systems. More than 50 credits at least should be available to ensure better qualification of art therapists in reality. Moreover, it is also necessary to stipulate the qualification for admittance to graduate schools to be furnished only to those who have completed and acquired basically more than 12-18 credits in the practice course of art and more than 12 credits in the course of psychology at college, as most universities and colleges do in the USA. Since, however, it is actually impossible to specify qualification for admittance in Korea as is done in the USA, it should be requested to increase the number of credits at graduate schools for those who have to take courses in psychology and art practice which they can't take at college. The current level of around 30 credits must be far behind from the requirements for training high-quality art therapists. Art therapists in the USA shall be regarded in fact as very superior to those of Korea who have to take courses in psychology as well as in practice at graduate schools in parallel with other subjects that are almost half in number of those in the USA. Although it is possible for those students who have completed the course of art practice at college to advance to graduate school to attend the class training art therapists in parallel with psychology, most students in Korea who have attained bachelor's degree at the college of humanity and social science, not at the fine arts college, take the master's degree program at graduate school to become art therapists. In other word, they become art therapists having just completed the training course for art therapists without understanding to fundamentals of fine arts, causing a vicious cycle eventually. The program for art therapy at graduate school may be considered to be systematically operated, to say the least, but the problem is that lots of people who have only been trained by the short-term courses at other than graduate schools and are therefore not qualified are actively engaged in practice in the name of art therapists. This, above all, should be rectified definitely and urgently by introducing the national qualification system for art therapists. It is encouraging to see that handicapped persons have come to greatly benefit from various policies including the activated boucher project that was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Surely, however, now is the time to take bold measures to straighten out the actual situation of Korea in which unqualified art therapists are actively practicing art therapy in the process of implementing the voucher project. It is also suggested to revise the curricular for art therapy in the master's degree program in Korea since the present study found that even those who have successfully completed mater's degree programs are far behind from being regarded as properly qualified for practicing art therapy in the field due to exceedingly short number of credits and clinical practice hours according to the curricula compared to those of the USA. In case of the USA, qualification for art therapy is imparted only to those who are awarded with mater's degree for art therapy from 27 universities that have been accredited by the American Society of Art Therapy. Whereas, in Korea, there is no official organization yet recognized to provide qualification for art therapy but several academic societies and private organizations are doing the job loosely. The data concerning the license for art therapy issued by 4 domestic academic societies and regulations of ATR qualification of the USA are enclosed in this study in an attempt to make them serve as basic data for comparison and review before introducing a national qualification system for art therapists in Korea.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.