이 연구의 목적은 축구 경기 중 골키퍼 행동 기술을 체계적이고 과학적인 분석을 통하여 경기 중 골키퍼가 사용하는 모든 기술과 주로 사용되는 기술별 유형과 전술적 기술을 분석하여 각 기술요인 비중을 규명하는데 있다. 이와 같은 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 2013년 K리그 클래식 5경기의 양쪽 팀 경기와 국가대표 10경기를 대상으로 고화질 영상의 편집·저장 기능이 탁월한 HD(고해상도 영상) 캡처 장비인 '에버미디어 HD 캡처 스테이션과 Soccer ...
이 연구의 목적은 축구 경기 중 골키퍼 행동 기술을 체계적이고 과학적인 분석을 통하여 경기 중 골키퍼가 사용하는 모든 기술과 주로 사용되는 기술별 유형과 전술적 기술을 분석하여 각 기술요인 비중을 규명하는데 있다. 이와 같은 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 2013년 K리그 클래식 5경기의 양쪽 팀 경기와 국가대표 10경기를 대상으로 고화질 영상의 편집·저장 기능이 탁월한 HD(고해상도 영상) 캡처 장비인 '에버미디어 HD 캡처 스테이션과 Soccer Data Analysis Program을 이용하였으며, 자료처리 방법은 SPSS Version 21.0 통계분석프로그램을 이용하여 설정된 연구문제 순으로 통계처리 하였다. 각 요인 및 집단간의 차이를 검증하기 위하여 t-test 및 ANOVA 검증을 실시하였고 요인내 집단간의 유의한 차이를 규명하고자 사후검증으로 scheffe‘s test를 실시하였으며, 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 첫째, 골키퍼 행동 기술 하위 요인의 활용빈도는 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 살펴보면, 골키퍼의 캐칭 기술요인의 활용빈도는 골키퍼의 캐칭 기술 요인에서 세이빙 캐칭과 스탠드 캐칭간 그리고 크로싱 캐칭과 세이빙 캐칭에서 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 경기 중에 골키퍼가 사용하는 펀칭 기술은 크로싱이 세이빙 보다 높게 나타났다. 그리고, 골키퍼의 킥 기술요인의 가장 활용빈도가 높은 기술은 골 킥, 백패스 킥, 그라운드 킥, 발리 킥, 프리킥 순으로 나타났다. 하위 요인 간에는 백패스 킥과 그라운드 킥, 발리 킥, 프리킥 기술 간 활용빈도는 유의한 차이가 있었으며 그라운드 킥과 발리킥, 프리킥과도 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또 다른 결과로, 골키퍼의 전술 기술 요인의 활용빈도는 빌드업 기술이 스로윙 기술보다 사용빈도가 높게 나타났다. 둘째, K리그와 국가대표 골키퍼의 행동 기술 요인간 차이를 검증한 결과, 크로스 캐칭과 크로스 펀칭에서는 K리그 골키퍼가 국가대표보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 백패스킥과 빌드업에서는 국가대표 골키퍼가 K리그 골키퍼보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높았다. 셋째, 경기결과(승․무․패)에 따른 골키퍼의 행동기술 요인의 차이를 검증한 결과, 캐칭(크로스캐칭, 세이빙캐칭, 스탠드캐칭), 펀칭(크로스펀칭, 세이빙펀칭), 킥(골킥, 발리킥, 백패스킥, 프리킥), 전술(스로윙, 빌드업)요인에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 전반적으로 캐칭, 펀칭, 킥의 골킥, 발리킥 요인에서는 패배․무승부 결과가 높게 나타났고, 킥의 그라운드킥, 백패스킥 전술 요인에서는 승리․무승부 결과가 높게 나타났다.
이 연구의 목적은 축구 경기 중 골키퍼 행동 기술을 체계적이고 과학적인 분석을 통하여 경기 중 골키퍼가 사용하는 모든 기술과 주로 사용되는 기술별 유형과 전술적 기술을 분석하여 각 기술요인 비중을 규명하는데 있다. 이와 같은 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 2013년 K리그 클래식 5경기의 양쪽 팀 경기와 국가대표 10경기를 대상으로 고화질 영상의 편집·저장 기능이 탁월한 HD(고해상도 영상) 캡처 장비인 '에버미디어 HD 캡처 스테이션과 Soccer Data Analysis Program을 이용하였으며, 자료처리 방법은 SPSS Version 21.0 통계분석프로그램을 이용하여 설정된 연구문제 순으로 통계처리 하였다. 각 요인 및 집단간의 차이를 검증하기 위하여 t-test 및 ANOVA 검증을 실시하였고 요인내 집단간의 유의한 차이를 규명하고자 사후검증으로 scheffe‘s test를 실시하였으며, 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 첫째, 골키퍼 행동 기술 하위 요인의 활용빈도는 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 살펴보면, 골키퍼의 캐칭 기술요인의 활용빈도는 골키퍼의 캐칭 기술 요인에서 세이빙 캐칭과 스탠드 캐칭간 그리고 크로싱 캐칭과 세이빙 캐칭에서 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 경기 중에 골키퍼가 사용하는 펀칭 기술은 크로싱이 세이빙 보다 높게 나타났다. 그리고, 골키퍼의 킥 기술요인의 가장 활용빈도가 높은 기술은 골 킥, 백패스 킥, 그라운드 킥, 발리 킥, 프리킥 순으로 나타났다. 하위 요인 간에는 백패스 킥과 그라운드 킥, 발리 킥, 프리킥 기술 간 활용빈도는 유의한 차이가 있었으며 그라운드 킥과 발리킥, 프리킥과도 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또 다른 결과로, 골키퍼의 전술 기술 요인의 활용빈도는 빌드업 기술이 스로윙 기술보다 사용빈도가 높게 나타났다. 둘째, K리그와 국가대표 골키퍼의 행동 기술 요인간 차이를 검증한 결과, 크로스 캐칭과 크로스 펀칭에서는 K리그 골키퍼가 국가대표보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 백패스킥과 빌드업에서는 국가대표 골키퍼가 K리그 골키퍼보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높았다. 셋째, 경기결과(승․무․패)에 따른 골키퍼의 행동기술 요인의 차이를 검증한 결과, 캐칭(크로스캐칭, 세이빙캐칭, 스탠드캐칭), 펀칭(크로스펀칭, 세이빙펀칭), 킥(골킥, 발리킥, 백패스킥, 프리킥), 전술(스로윙, 빌드업)요인에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 전반적으로 캐칭, 펀칭, 킥의 골킥, 발리킥 요인에서는 패배․무승부 결과가 높게 나타났고, 킥의 그라운드킥, 백패스킥 전술 요인에서는 승리․무승부 결과가 높게 나타났다.
The purpose of the present study was to analyze all the skills used by goalkeeper during soccer match and the types of skills and tactical skills mainly used in order to identify the importance each skill factor through a systematic and scientific analysis of the behavioral skills of goalkeeper duri...
The purpose of the present study was to analyze all the skills used by goalkeeper during soccer match and the types of skills and tactical skills mainly used in order to identify the importance each skill factor through a systematic and scientific analysis of the behavioral skills of goalkeeper during soccer match. In order to achieve the purpose of research, 5 games of K-League Classic and 10 A matches of the national team in 2013 were analyzed by using Soccer Data Analysis Program and ‘Evermedia HD Capture Station’, which is an HD capture equipment with excellent functions of editing and storage of high-definition video. For data process, data analysis program of SPSS Version 21.0 was used for statistical process according to the order of research questions established. To verify differences between the factors, t-test and ANOVA were carried out. To identify significant differences between groups within factors, Scheffe’s test and t-test of independent samples between 2 groups were carried out as posteriori tests. The results of analysis were as follows: 1. There were differences in the frequency of use of sub-factors of behavioral skills of goalkeeper. Firstly. The frequency of use of the catching skill factor of goalkeeper showed significant differences between crossing, saving, and stand factors among catching skill factors of goalkeeper. And there were significant differences between saving catching and stand catching, and between crossing caching and saving catching. Secondly. The frequency of use of the punching skill factor of goalkeeper showed significant differences between crossing punching and saving punching. And as for the punching skills used by goalkeeper during the match, crossing was higher than saving. Thirdly. In the frequency of use of the kick skill factor of goalkeeper, kick skill factor of goalkeeper during the match showed significant differences between groups. The skills of the highest frequency of use were in the order of goal kick, back pass kick, ground kick, volley kick, and free kick. Between sub-factors, there were significant differences in the frequency of use among back pass kick, ground kick, volley kick, free kick skills. And there were significant differences among ground kick, volley kick, and free kick skills. Fourthly. As for the frequency of use of tactical skill factor of goalkeeper, there were significant differences between throwing and build-up skills. And as for the frequency of use during the match, build-up skill showed a higher frequency than throwing skill. 2. The differences among behavioral skills of goalkeeper of K-League and national team were higher in the order of catching factor, kick factor, strategy factor, punching factor. The differences among the specific sub-factors of behavioral skills factors was the highest in crossing catching to be followed by cross punching. And goalkeepers of K-League were higher than those of the national team. In back pass kick factor in kick factor and build-up factor in strategy factor, goalkeepers of the national team were higher than those of K-League. In kick factor, there were significant differences in goal kick (out of play), back pass kick (in play), cross punching, and build-up factors. But there were no significant differences among the skills factors of ground kick, volley kick, free kick, throwing, stand catching, saving catching, and saving punching. 3. As for behavioral skills factors of goalkeeper according to the result of match, there were significant differences in catching factor, punching factor, and strategy factor; there were no significant differences in ground kick factor among kick factors; there were significant differences in factors of goal kick, volley kick, and free kick.
The purpose of the present study was to analyze all the skills used by goalkeeper during soccer match and the types of skills and tactical skills mainly used in order to identify the importance each skill factor through a systematic and scientific analysis of the behavioral skills of goalkeeper during soccer match. In order to achieve the purpose of research, 5 games of K-League Classic and 10 A matches of the national team in 2013 were analyzed by using Soccer Data Analysis Program and ‘Evermedia HD Capture Station’, which is an HD capture equipment with excellent functions of editing and storage of high-definition video. For data process, data analysis program of SPSS Version 21.0 was used for statistical process according to the order of research questions established. To verify differences between the factors, t-test and ANOVA were carried out. To identify significant differences between groups within factors, Scheffe’s test and t-test of independent samples between 2 groups were carried out as posteriori tests. The results of analysis were as follows: 1. There were differences in the frequency of use of sub-factors of behavioral skills of goalkeeper. Firstly. The frequency of use of the catching skill factor of goalkeeper showed significant differences between crossing, saving, and stand factors among catching skill factors of goalkeeper. And there were significant differences between saving catching and stand catching, and between crossing caching and saving catching. Secondly. The frequency of use of the punching skill factor of goalkeeper showed significant differences between crossing punching and saving punching. And as for the punching skills used by goalkeeper during the match, crossing was higher than saving. Thirdly. In the frequency of use of the kick skill factor of goalkeeper, kick skill factor of goalkeeper during the match showed significant differences between groups. The skills of the highest frequency of use were in the order of goal kick, back pass kick, ground kick, volley kick, and free kick. Between sub-factors, there were significant differences in the frequency of use among back pass kick, ground kick, volley kick, free kick skills. And there were significant differences among ground kick, volley kick, and free kick skills. Fourthly. As for the frequency of use of tactical skill factor of goalkeeper, there were significant differences between throwing and build-up skills. And as for the frequency of use during the match, build-up skill showed a higher frequency than throwing skill. 2. The differences among behavioral skills of goalkeeper of K-League and national team were higher in the order of catching factor, kick factor, strategy factor, punching factor. The differences among the specific sub-factors of behavioral skills factors was the highest in crossing catching to be followed by cross punching. And goalkeepers of K-League were higher than those of the national team. In back pass kick factor in kick factor and build-up factor in strategy factor, goalkeepers of the national team were higher than those of K-League. In kick factor, there were significant differences in goal kick (out of play), back pass kick (in play), cross punching, and build-up factors. But there were no significant differences among the skills factors of ground kick, volley kick, free kick, throwing, stand catching, saving catching, and saving punching. 3. As for behavioral skills factors of goalkeeper according to the result of match, there were significant differences in catching factor, punching factor, and strategy factor; there were no significant differences in ground kick factor among kick factors; there were significant differences in factors of goal kick, volley kick, and free kick.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.