본 연구는 가트맨(Gottman)의 부부치료 이론을 기반로 이혼위기 부부의 관계성 회복을 위한 집단프로그램 개발 및 효과성을 검증하기 위하여 양적 연구와 질적 연구를 병행하여 수행하였다. 이를 바탕으로 이혼예방 집단프로그램 활성화를 위한 실천적 함의를 도출하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 이혼위기 부부 5쌍을 대상으로 2013년 1월 4일부터 2월 10일까지 매주 1회씩 총 6회기 동안 매회 150분씩 집단프로그램으로 실시하였다. 집단프로그램의 효과성 검증을 위하여 첫째, 양적 연구로는 가트맨 부부정밀검사(Gotmann ...
본 연구는 가트맨(Gottman)의 부부치료 이론을 기반로 이혼위기 부부의 관계성 회복을 위한 집단프로그램 개발 및 효과성을 검증하기 위하여 양적 연구와 질적 연구를 병행하여 수행하였다. 이를 바탕으로 이혼예방 집단프로그램 활성화를 위한 실천적 함의를 도출하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 이혼위기 부부 5쌍을 대상으로 2013년 1월 4일부터 2월 10일까지 매주 1회씩 총 6회기 동안 매회 150분씩 집단프로그램으로 실시하였다. 집단프로그램의 효과성 검증을 위하여 첫째, 양적 연구로는 가트맨 부부정밀검사(Gotmann SRH Questionaires), 와이스-세레토 결혼위기도 검사, 결혼만족도(K-MSI) 측정도구를 사용하여 각 부부별 사전․사후․ 추후검사를 실시하였다. 집단별 차이를 알아보기 위해서는 평균과 표준편차를 산출하였으며, 사전검사 동질성과 추후검사 동질성을 파악하기 위해서는 Mann-Whitney U Test와 집단의 사전, 사후, 추후(3개월 후)에 (+), (-) 방향에 따른 크기를 고려한 차이 검증을 위해 Wilcoxon signed rank test를 실시하였다. 둘째, 심층면접분석방법을 통하여 질적 연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과는 다음과 같이 연구내용이 검증되었다. 첫째, 이혼위기를 경험하고 있는 부부는 본 프로그램을 통하여 결혼만족도가 향상되었으며, 결혼위기도가 감소되었다. 둘째, 이혼위기를 경험하고 있는 부부는 긍정적 감정이 향상되었으며, 의사소통 악화요인이 긍정적으로 변화되었다. 셋째, 이혼위기를 경험하고 있는 부부는 갈등조정방식이 긍정적으로 변화되었다. 통제집단과 실험집단의 프로그램 실시 후 추후변화를 검증하기 위하여 프로그램 시행 직후 검사를 실시하고 3개월 후에도 각 집단에 어떠한 변화가 있었는지, 특히 실험집단에 나타난 프로그램의 효과성이 지속되는지를 Wilcoxen 검증을 통하여 확인하였다. 그 결과, 실험집단의 아내는 결혼위기도, 결혼만족도, 사랑의 지도, 호감과 존중, 다가가기 또는 멀어지기, 의사소통 악화요인, 거칠게 시작하기, 배우자의 영향 수용하기 등은 프로그램 실시 후 향상된 프로그램의 효과가 3개월 후에도 그대로 유지되고 있음을 보여주었다. 그러나 실험집단에서 아내의 “회복 시작하기”는 유의한 차이가 나타나 프로그램 실시 후 향상된 프로그램의 효과는 추후검사에서는 나타나지 않았다. 실험집단의 남편은 결혼위기도, 결혼만족도, 사랑의 지도, 호감과 존중, 다가가기 또는 멀어지기, 의사소통 악화요인, 거칠게 시작하기, 회복 시도하기, 배우자의 영향 수용하기 등은 사후점수보다 추후점수가 낮게 나타났지만 유의한 차이는 보이지 않아 프로그램 실시 후 향상된 프로그램의 효과는 추후검사에서도 그대로 유지되고 있음을 보여준다. 질적연구 분석을 통한 부부치료 효과를 분석한 결과는 양적연구에서 검증된 결혼만족도향상, 결혼위기도 감소에 직접적인 영향을 가져다 줄 수 있는 긍정적 감정이 향상되었고, 의사소통 악화요인이 긍정적으로 변화되었으며, 갈등조정방식이 긍정적으로 변화되었다. 따라서 본 연구는 이혼위기 부부를 대상으로 관계회복을 위한 집단프로그램을 실시하여 효과성을 검증하였고 본 집단프로그램을 통하여 많은 이혼위기 부부의 관계회복을 위한 집단프로그램으로서 실천적 개입방법을 개발하였다는데 의의가 있다.
본 연구는 가트맨(Gottman)의 부부치료 이론을 기반로 이혼위기 부부의 관계성 회복을 위한 집단프로그램 개발 및 효과성을 검증하기 위하여 양적 연구와 질적 연구를 병행하여 수행하였다. 이를 바탕으로 이혼예방 집단프로그램 활성화를 위한 실천적 함의를 도출하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 이혼위기 부부 5쌍을 대상으로 2013년 1월 4일부터 2월 10일까지 매주 1회씩 총 6회기 동안 매회 150분씩 집단프로그램으로 실시하였다. 집단프로그램의 효과성 검증을 위하여 첫째, 양적 연구로는 가트맨 부부정밀검사(Gotmann SRH Questionaires), 와이스-세레토 결혼위기도 검사, 결혼만족도(K-MSI) 측정도구를 사용하여 각 부부별 사전․사후․ 추후검사를 실시하였다. 집단별 차이를 알아보기 위해서는 평균과 표준편차를 산출하였으며, 사전검사 동질성과 추후검사 동질성을 파악하기 위해서는 Mann-Whitney U Test와 집단의 사전, 사후, 추후(3개월 후)에 (+), (-) 방향에 따른 크기를 고려한 차이 검증을 위해 Wilcoxon signed rank test를 실시하였다. 둘째, 심층면접분석방법을 통하여 질적 연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과는 다음과 같이 연구내용이 검증되었다. 첫째, 이혼위기를 경험하고 있는 부부는 본 프로그램을 통하여 결혼만족도가 향상되었으며, 결혼위기도가 감소되었다. 둘째, 이혼위기를 경험하고 있는 부부는 긍정적 감정이 향상되었으며, 의사소통 악화요인이 긍정적으로 변화되었다. 셋째, 이혼위기를 경험하고 있는 부부는 갈등조정방식이 긍정적으로 변화되었다. 통제집단과 실험집단의 프로그램 실시 후 추후변화를 검증하기 위하여 프로그램 시행 직후 검사를 실시하고 3개월 후에도 각 집단에 어떠한 변화가 있었는지, 특히 실험집단에 나타난 프로그램의 효과성이 지속되는지를 Wilcoxen 검증을 통하여 확인하였다. 그 결과, 실험집단의 아내는 결혼위기도, 결혼만족도, 사랑의 지도, 호감과 존중, 다가가기 또는 멀어지기, 의사소통 악화요인, 거칠게 시작하기, 배우자의 영향 수용하기 등은 프로그램 실시 후 향상된 프로그램의 효과가 3개월 후에도 그대로 유지되고 있음을 보여주었다. 그러나 실험집단에서 아내의 “회복 시작하기”는 유의한 차이가 나타나 프로그램 실시 후 향상된 프로그램의 효과는 추후검사에서는 나타나지 않았다. 실험집단의 남편은 결혼위기도, 결혼만족도, 사랑의 지도, 호감과 존중, 다가가기 또는 멀어지기, 의사소통 악화요인, 거칠게 시작하기, 회복 시도하기, 배우자의 영향 수용하기 등은 사후점수보다 추후점수가 낮게 나타났지만 유의한 차이는 보이지 않아 프로그램 실시 후 향상된 프로그램의 효과는 추후검사에서도 그대로 유지되고 있음을 보여준다. 질적연구 분석을 통한 부부치료 효과를 분석한 결과는 양적연구에서 검증된 결혼만족도향상, 결혼위기도 감소에 직접적인 영향을 가져다 줄 수 있는 긍정적 감정이 향상되었고, 의사소통 악화요인이 긍정적으로 변화되었으며, 갈등조정방식이 긍정적으로 변화되었다. 따라서 본 연구는 이혼위기 부부를 대상으로 관계회복을 위한 집단프로그램을 실시하여 효과성을 검증하였고 본 집단프로그램을 통하여 많은 이혼위기 부부의 관계회복을 위한 집단프로그램으로서 실천적 개입방법을 개발하였다는데 의의가 있다.
This study aims to develop more effective group counseling program as well as to examine the effectiveness of the afore-mentioned program that is assumed to play a positive role in helping couples who are subject to divorce recover relations with their spouses from unhappy ones based on Gottman's Re...
This study aims to develop more effective group counseling program as well as to examine the effectiveness of the afore-mentioned program that is assumed to play a positive role in helping couples who are subject to divorce recover relations with their spouses from unhappy ones based on Gottman's Research and Couple's counseling. To examine the effectiveness of the group counseling program previously mentioned here in this article, both quantitative and qualitative studies were conducted. This study also ultimately aims to draw feasible implications that can lead couples to use the group counseling program to help them not to divorce based on findings of this study. A total of five(5) couples where were at risk for divorce participated in the group counseling program, and the group counseling program was administered on them over a total period of six(6) sessions, one(1) session per week, from Jan. 4th, 2013 to Feb. 10th, 2014. Each session was designed to be 150 minutes. To examine the effectiveness of the group counseling program, first, measurement tools such as Gotmann SRH Questionaires, Weiss-Ceretto Marital Status Inventory Conflict Tactics, and K-MSI were used to administer pre, post, and follow-up. To examine differences between groups, mean and standard deviations were computed. To determine whether the results of pre-test and those of follow-up test are homogeneous, Mann-Whitney U Test was employed, and to examine differences in accordance with the directions (+), (-), during pre-group test, post-group test, and at follow-up test (after three months), Wilcoxon signed rank test was administered. Second, qualitative study was administered through in-depth interview approach. The findings show that, First, the group counseling program improved the participants' marriage satisfaction while reducing their possibilities of getting divorced even though they were at risk for divorce. Second, the program also helps them change their negative emotions to positive ones towards their spouses while reducing causes that hinder their well-rounded communications with their spouses. Third, the program also helps them change their usual methods of controlling conflicts to positive methods from negative ones. Tests were also administered immediately after conducting the program on both the control group and experiment group so as to check if there any changes in their attitudes towards their spouses, and Wilcoxen was also used to check if there any changes in their attitudes towards their spouses three months after they joined the program, particularly the effectiveness of the program in which they participated continues later on. It shows that the wives of the male participants who had been assigned to experiment group were found to show the effects of their participation in the program were the same even three months after they joined the program, in the survey items such as their crisis levels of divorce, marriage satisfaction levels, their maps of love, whether they have a favourable impression on their spouses, whether they respect their spouses, whether they try to be friendly with their spouses or they try to keep distance from their spouses, how hard they try to get rid of factors that hinder their communication with their spouses, whether they try to speak to the spouses by using rough words, and whether they try to accept their spouses's requests and opinions. However, there were significant differences in the wives of the male participants who had been assigned to experiment group, because they did not show improved relationships with their spouses at follow-up tests. For husbands who were assigned to experiment group, they show lower scores in the survey items such as their crisis levels of divorce, marriage satisfaction levels, their maps of love, whether they have a favourable impression on their spouses, whether they respect their spouses, whether they try to be friendly with their spouses or they try to keep distance from their spouses, how hard they try to get rid of factors that hinder their communication with their spouses, whether they attempt to start relation recovery, and whether they try to accept their spouses's requests and opinions at follow-up test than at post-test, but these differences in scores were not significant which means that the improved effects of the program on the participants showed after the program implemented are the same in the follow-up tests. Analysis of the results of the couple counseling program through qualitative study shows that the subjects' positive emotions toward their spouses improved that might directly affect their improved marriage satisfaction and decreased possibility of they being placed in marriage crisis, the factors that play negative roles in making communications between couples hard changed for the positive manner, and their usual methods of alleviating conflicts with their spouses also changed for the positive manner. Their improved marriage satisfaction and decreased possibility of they being placed in marriage crisis were also shown in the quantitative study. These findings show that this study is significant in that the effectiveness of the group counseling program administered on couples who were at risk for divorces was examined, which was designed to help them recover the relations with their spouses from unhappy ones, and also in that feasible intervention methods as part of group counseling program was developed to the afore-mentioned effect.
This study aims to develop more effective group counseling program as well as to examine the effectiveness of the afore-mentioned program that is assumed to play a positive role in helping couples who are subject to divorce recover relations with their spouses from unhappy ones based on Gottman's Research and Couple's counseling. To examine the effectiveness of the group counseling program previously mentioned here in this article, both quantitative and qualitative studies were conducted. This study also ultimately aims to draw feasible implications that can lead couples to use the group counseling program to help them not to divorce based on findings of this study. A total of five(5) couples where were at risk for divorce participated in the group counseling program, and the group counseling program was administered on them over a total period of six(6) sessions, one(1) session per week, from Jan. 4th, 2013 to Feb. 10th, 2014. Each session was designed to be 150 minutes. To examine the effectiveness of the group counseling program, first, measurement tools such as Gotmann SRH Questionaires, Weiss-Ceretto Marital Status Inventory Conflict Tactics, and K-MSI were used to administer pre, post, and follow-up. To examine differences between groups, mean and standard deviations were computed. To determine whether the results of pre-test and those of follow-up test are homogeneous, Mann-Whitney U Test was employed, and to examine differences in accordance with the directions (+), (-), during pre-group test, post-group test, and at follow-up test (after three months), Wilcoxon signed rank test was administered. Second, qualitative study was administered through in-depth interview approach. The findings show that, First, the group counseling program improved the participants' marriage satisfaction while reducing their possibilities of getting divorced even though they were at risk for divorce. Second, the program also helps them change their negative emotions to positive ones towards their spouses while reducing causes that hinder their well-rounded communications with their spouses. Third, the program also helps them change their usual methods of controlling conflicts to positive methods from negative ones. Tests were also administered immediately after conducting the program on both the control group and experiment group so as to check if there any changes in their attitudes towards their spouses, and Wilcoxen was also used to check if there any changes in their attitudes towards their spouses three months after they joined the program, particularly the effectiveness of the program in which they participated continues later on. It shows that the wives of the male participants who had been assigned to experiment group were found to show the effects of their participation in the program were the same even three months after they joined the program, in the survey items such as their crisis levels of divorce, marriage satisfaction levels, their maps of love, whether they have a favourable impression on their spouses, whether they respect their spouses, whether they try to be friendly with their spouses or they try to keep distance from their spouses, how hard they try to get rid of factors that hinder their communication with their spouses, whether they try to speak to the spouses by using rough words, and whether they try to accept their spouses's requests and opinions. However, there were significant differences in the wives of the male participants who had been assigned to experiment group, because they did not show improved relationships with their spouses at follow-up tests. For husbands who were assigned to experiment group, they show lower scores in the survey items such as their crisis levels of divorce, marriage satisfaction levels, their maps of love, whether they have a favourable impression on their spouses, whether they respect their spouses, whether they try to be friendly with their spouses or they try to keep distance from their spouses, how hard they try to get rid of factors that hinder their communication with their spouses, whether they attempt to start relation recovery, and whether they try to accept their spouses's requests and opinions at follow-up test than at post-test, but these differences in scores were not significant which means that the improved effects of the program on the participants showed after the program implemented are the same in the follow-up tests. Analysis of the results of the couple counseling program through qualitative study shows that the subjects' positive emotions toward their spouses improved that might directly affect their improved marriage satisfaction and decreased possibility of they being placed in marriage crisis, the factors that play negative roles in making communications between couples hard changed for the positive manner, and their usual methods of alleviating conflicts with their spouses also changed for the positive manner. Their improved marriage satisfaction and decreased possibility of they being placed in marriage crisis were also shown in the quantitative study. These findings show that this study is significant in that the effectiveness of the group counseling program administered on couples who were at risk for divorces was examined, which was designed to help them recover the relations with their spouses from unhappy ones, and also in that feasible intervention methods as part of group counseling program was developed to the afore-mentioned effect.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.