This study examined previous literature regarding the leisure constraint models and negotiation processes and hypothesized the relationships among leisure constraints, leisure motivations, leisure negotiation and behavioral intentions for casino employees. Using total 291 responses obtained, explora...
This study examined previous literature regarding the leisure constraint models and negotiation processes and hypothesized the relationships among leisure constraints, leisure motivations, leisure negotiation and behavioral intentions for casino employees. Using total 291 responses obtained, exploratory factor analysis categorized three factors in leisure constraints, including intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural constraints, which were in line with previous literature. Leisure motivations were composed with three factors including togetherness, escape, and accomplishment. Negotiations were identified with four factors including organizational harmony, socialization, exploration, and systematization. The level of behavioral intentions were interpreted as leisure participation. Based upon the thirteen factors, confirmatory factor analysis was processed to evaluate reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, followed by identifying factor loadings of each item. Structural Equation Modelling was followed by examining the model fitness. After that, differences between the constrained model and free model were verified to figure out whether the Perceived Leisure Support controls the leisure constraints-negotiation process. Using the information gained from the analyses, leisure constraint model for casino employees were defined and it enabled to attain several conclusions. First, among leisure constraints, only intrapersonal constraints were proven to be influential to the negotiation process but the impact of intrapersonal constraints was proven to be negative on leisure negotiation. Second, among leisure motivations, both escape and accomplishment made significant positive impacts on negotiation processes. Third, the level of leisure negotiation improved the behavioral intention on leisure activities. As a conclusion, it was clear for casino employees that motivations were more powerful drives for the leisure participation rather than constrains, and it had potentials to make respondents actually be a part of leisure. For casino organizations, strategies focusing on encouraging leisure motivation for employees will refresh the working environment, giving a way of reducing stress successfully. For the tourism businesses, marketing messages will be more effectively delivered when triggering the leisure motivations for company workers.
This study examined previous literature regarding the leisure constraint models and negotiation processes and hypothesized the relationships among leisure constraints, leisure motivations, leisure negotiation and behavioral intentions for casino employees. Using total 291 responses obtained, exploratory factor analysis categorized three factors in leisure constraints, including intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural constraints, which were in line with previous literature. Leisure motivations were composed with three factors including togetherness, escape, and accomplishment. Negotiations were identified with four factors including organizational harmony, socialization, exploration, and systematization. The level of behavioral intentions were interpreted as leisure participation. Based upon the thirteen factors, confirmatory factor analysis was processed to evaluate reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, followed by identifying factor loadings of each item. Structural Equation Modelling was followed by examining the model fitness. After that, differences between the constrained model and free model were verified to figure out whether the Perceived Leisure Support controls the leisure constraints-negotiation process. Using the information gained from the analyses, leisure constraint model for casino employees were defined and it enabled to attain several conclusions. First, among leisure constraints, only intrapersonal constraints were proven to be influential to the negotiation process but the impact of intrapersonal constraints was proven to be negative on leisure negotiation. Second, among leisure motivations, both escape and accomplishment made significant positive impacts on negotiation processes. Third, the level of leisure negotiation improved the behavioral intention on leisure activities. As a conclusion, it was clear for casino employees that motivations were more powerful drives for the leisure participation rather than constrains, and it had potentials to make respondents actually be a part of leisure. For casino organizations, strategies focusing on encouraging leisure motivation for employees will refresh the working environment, giving a way of reducing stress successfully. For the tourism businesses, marketing messages will be more effectively delivered when triggering the leisure motivations for company workers.
주제어
#여가제약, 여가동기, 여가협상, 여가제약협상모델, 카지노, Casino Employees, Leisure Constraints, Leisure Motivation, Constraints Negotiation Processes, Constraint Models
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.