$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

Development of the Numerical Guide for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Occupational Radiation Exposure In the Korean Next Generation Reactor

Abstract

The specific purpose of this study is to develop the numerical guide for the cost-benefit analysis of ORE ($/person-Sv reduction) to meet the criterion of ALARA in the design stage of the KNGR. In deriving the guide, the risk factor which is defined by the risk to unit collective radiation exposure dose (deaths/person-Sv) and the monetary value of human life ($/death) are required. The risk factor has been estimated from various clinical data accumulated for a number of years and continuously modified. And the monetary value of human life is usually quantified using the human capital approach. In this study, the risk to radiation exposure perceived by a group of people is investigated through an extensive poll survey conducted among university students in order to modify the existing risk factor for radiation exposure. And in evaluating the monetary value of human life, the QOL factor is introduced in order to incorporate the degree of public welfare or quality of life. As a result of study, a value within the range of 151, 000~172, 000 dollars per person-Sv reduction is recommended as the appropriate interim numerical guide for cost-benefit analysis of ORE to meet the criterion of ALARA in the design stage of the KNGR. A poll survey was also conducted in order to see whether the public acceptance cost of nuclear power should be incorporated in developing the guide, and the result of study shooed that such a cost does not need to be considered.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (10)

  1. Thomas M. Power , The Economic Value of the Quality of Life / v.,pp., 1980
  2. Study of the System of Dose Limitation : Long Term Variation of the αo Value in Japan, IAEA-SM-285/06 , Y. Nakashima;M. Doi , Proceedings of a Symposium, Vienna, 10-14 March 1986 jointly organized by IAEA and OECD/NEA, IAEA / v.,pp., 1986
  3. KEPRI , Research & Development on Next Generation Reactor ( PhaseⅠ) : Design of Radiation Protection / v.,pp., 1994
  4. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , International Commission on Radiological Protection , ICRP Publication 60 / v.,pp., 1991
  5. Radiation Protection : ALARA from Theory towards Practice , Commission of the European Communities , EUR 13796EN / v.,pp., 1991
  6. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , International Commission on Radiological Protection , ICRP Publication 26 / v.,pp., 1977
  7. Facts and Fears : Understanding Perceived Risk , Paul Slovic(et al.);R. Schwing(ed.);W.A. Albers, Jr.(ed.) , Societal Risk Assessment : How Safe Is Safe Enough? / v.,pp., 1980
  8. Risk Perception Among Nuclear Power Plant Personnel : A Survey , Mika Kivim ki;Raija Kalimo , Risk Analysis / v.13,pp., 1993
  9. A Study on the Radiation and Environmental Safety : Development of Radiation Protection and Measurement Technology , KAERI/RR-1328/93 / v.,pp., 1994
  10. World Bank , Social Indicators of Development / v.,pp., 1993

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일