선택한 단어 수는 입니다.
최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
선택한 단어 수는 30입니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
제안 방법
- To clarify the reliability of LLLT, 39 subjects, 19 patients and 20 controls, took part in the second study. All of the subjects were randomly classified into four various groups; 10 in the LLLT-patient group, 9 in the sham LLLT-patient group, 10 in the LLLT-control group and 10 in the sham LLLT-control group. We used the same apparatus and the method was identical to the previous study.
- For reliability, the measurements were taken three times at each marked trigger point and the mean value of the three measurements was accepted. Before treatment, on the 2nd week and after treatment, the PPT was taken on both the LLLT and the sham LLLT group, both two patient and two control groups.
- The same unit was used for the placebo treatment, for which no laser beam was emitted. Each subject was treated twice at the first weeks and once a week during the following three weeks. A total treatment was 5 times during 4weeks.
- All measurements in each group were averaged. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the increase of the PPT values. Differences in the PPT between the LLLT and sham LLLT group, patient and control groups, inter-patient and inter-control groups before treatment were analyzed with the unpaired t-test.
- The electronic algometer type I used in this study consists of a gun shaped application handle with a round rubber tip (diameter = 11mm) and a main body that has a digital display panel, calibration knob, control knob of application rate slope, and a patient-operated switch(Fig. 1).
- We performed two steps in this double-blind study. The first study was to evaluate the effect of LLLT within patient groups, and the second study was mainly to compare the effects of actual laser therapy with placebo treatment between the patient and control groups. In the first study, 69 dental students, 39 males and 30 females, at Pusan National University, were studied by pressure algometer after laser application.
- In this double blind study, one of the popular 820nm GaAlAs diode laser was used at the sensitive trigger points. The therapeutic effect in both the LLLT and sham LLLT group and the comparison between laser treatment and placebo in both patient and control groups were assessed by pressure pain threshold measurements. In the first study, A significant increase of the PPT values was found in the LLLT group from the third day of laser exposure (P<0.
- To clarify the reliability of LLLT, 39 subjects, 19 patients and 20 controls, took part in the second study. All of the subjects were randomly classified into four various groups; 10 in the LLLT-patient group, 9 in the sham LLLT-patient group, 10 in the LLLT-control group and 10 in the sham LLLT-control group.
대상 데이터
- The first study was to evaluate the effect of LLLT within patient groups, and the second study was mainly to compare the effects of actual laser therapy with placebo treatment between the patient and control groups. In the first study, 69 dental students, 39 males and 30 females, at Pusan National University, were studied by pressure algometer after laser application. The mean age of male subjects was 23.
- The laser apparatus is a handylaser 50-SLⓇ class B which is fitted with a 820nm, 50mW, GaAlAs diode(Fig. 2). The power output can be regulated with ease and precision using the handylaser; In 40 seconds, 2 Joules are emitted with continuous beam and when the frequency modulation is in operation, 1 Joule is emitted.
- They were randomly assigned to either a LLLT group or a sham LLLT group. To clarify the reliability of LLLT, 39 subjects, 19 patients and 20 controls subjects, were randomly classified into four various groups; 10 in the LLLT-patient group, 9 in the sham LLLT-patient group, 10 in the LLLT-control group and 10 in the sham LLLT-control group.
데이터처리
- Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the increase of the PPT values. Differences in the PPT between the LLLT and sham LLLT group, patient and control groups, inter-patient and inter-control groups before treatment were analyzed with the unpaired t-test. The repeated-measure ANOVA was performed to analyze the treatment and time effect for the PPT changes within each muscle.
- Differences in the PPT between the LLLT and sham LLLT group, patient and control groups, inter-patient and inter-control groups before treatment were analyzed with the unpaired t-test. The repeated-measure ANOVA was performed to analyze the treatment and time effect for the PPT changes within each muscle. The statistical comparison of P-values of the LLLT and sham LLLT group, inter-patient and inter-control groups was carried out with the paired t-test separately at each session.
- The repeated-measure ANOVA was performed to analyze the treatment and time effect for the PPT changes within each muscle. The statistical comparison of P-values of the LLLT and sham LLLT group, inter-patient and inter-control groups was carried out with the paired t-test separately at each session. P-values of less than 0.
이론/모형
- The intermuscle regional differences in both temporalis and masseter muscles have been reported21). Therefore, this study was designed to obtain the reliability and reproducibility of the algometer by using specific marked trigger point detected from Travell and Simmons' technique.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.