골중납 측정의 시료 전처리 (산분해법과 마이크로웨이브 분해법)와 측정 방법 (유도결합 플라즈마 질량분석법과 흑연로 원자 흡수 분광 광도법)의 비교 Comparisons of sample preparation (acid digestion and microwave digestion) and measurement (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry) in the determination of bone lead원문보기
본 연구는 인체의 골중 납 농도를 측정하는데 필요한 시료 전처리법과 기기 분석법을 평가하기 위하여 수행되었다. 절단한 인간 사체 다리의 뼈를 상온에서의 산 분해법과 마이크로웨이브 분해법 (microwave oven method)을이용하여 납을 추출하였으며, 유도결합 플라즈마 질량분석법 (ICP-MS)과 흑연로 원자 흡수 분광 광도법 (GF-AAS)으로 납 농도를 측정하였다. 표준시료를 이용하여 회수율을 조사한 결과, 산분해 후 ICP-MS로 측정한 경우 높은 회수율을 보였으나, 산분해 후 GF-AAS로 측정한 것은 표준 농도보다 낮은 값을 보였으며, 마이크로웨이브 분해한 경우는 두 측정기기 모두 표준 농도보다 높은 값을 보였다. 뼈 시료의 경우, 산분해 후 ICP-MS로 측정한 납 농도는 GF-AAS의 값과 높은 상관성을 보였으나 (상관계수 = 0.983), GF-AAS가 ICP-MS보다 계통적으로 높은 값을 측정하였다. 마이크로웨이브 분해 역시 두 분석방법이 높은 상관성을 보였으나 (상관계수 = 0.950), 대체로 산분해에 의한 값보다 높은 농도를 보였다. 결론적으로, 상온에서 질산으로 분해 후 ICP-MS를 이용하여 측정한 것이 골중 납 농도를 결정하는데 편이성과 정확성 면에서 가장 효율적인 방법으로 보인다.
본 연구는 인체의 골중 납 농도를 측정하는데 필요한 시료 전처리법과 기기 분석법을 평가하기 위하여 수행되었다. 절단한 인간 사체 다리의 뼈를 상온에서의 산 분해법과 마이크로웨이브 분해법 (microwave oven method)을이용하여 납을 추출하였으며, 유도결합 플라즈마 질량분석법 (ICP-MS)과 흑연로 원자 흡수 분광 광도법 (GF-AAS)으로 납 농도를 측정하였다. 표준시료를 이용하여 회수율을 조사한 결과, 산분해 후 ICP-MS로 측정한 경우 높은 회수율을 보였으나, 산분해 후 GF-AAS로 측정한 것은 표준 농도보다 낮은 값을 보였으며, 마이크로웨이브 분해한 경우는 두 측정기기 모두 표준 농도보다 높은 값을 보였다. 뼈 시료의 경우, 산분해 후 ICP-MS로 측정한 납 농도는 GF-AAS의 값과 높은 상관성을 보였으나 (상관계수 = 0.983), GF-AAS가 ICP-MS보다 계통적으로 높은 값을 측정하였다. 마이크로웨이브 분해 역시 두 분석방법이 높은 상관성을 보였으나 (상관계수 = 0.950), 대체로 산분해에 의한 값보다 높은 농도를 보였다. 결론적으로, 상온에서 질산으로 분해 후 ICP-MS를 이용하여 측정한 것이 골중 납 농도를 결정하는데 편이성과 정확성 면에서 가장 효율적인 방법으로 보인다.
This study was conducted to evaluate two sample digestion procedures and instrumental determination parameters for analysis of lead in bone. Amputated human legs were treated by acid digestion or microwave dissolution prior to spectrometric analysis. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP...
This study was conducted to evaluate two sample digestion procedures and instrumental determination parameters for analysis of lead in bone. Amputated human legs were treated by acid digestion or microwave dissolution prior to spectrometric analysis. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS) were used for determining bone lead levels. Recovery efficiencies using standard reference material from acid digestion measured by ICP-MS were in good agreement with those of the certified value, but in cases of acid digestion by GF-AAS and microwave digestion by both two methods, recovery underestimated and overestimated, respectively. For the bone samples, the lead concentrations obtained by ICP-MS after acid digestionwere in good agreement with those by GF-AAS (correlation coefficient = 0.983), but GF-AAS gave systematically higher values than ICP-MS. While a good agreement between two analytical methods after microwave digestion was also obtained (correlation coefficient = 0.950), bone lead concentrations from microwave were relatively higher than those from acid digestion. In conclusion, the use of the simple nitric acid digestion procedure at an ambient temperature coupled to ICP-MS seems to be efficient for the determination of lead in bone in consideration for both the convenience and validity.
This study was conducted to evaluate two sample digestion procedures and instrumental determination parameters for analysis of lead in bone. Amputated human legs were treated by acid digestion or microwave dissolution prior to spectrometric analysis. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS) were used for determining bone lead levels. Recovery efficiencies using standard reference material from acid digestion measured by ICP-MS were in good agreement with those of the certified value, but in cases of acid digestion by GF-AAS and microwave digestion by both two methods, recovery underestimated and overestimated, respectively. For the bone samples, the lead concentrations obtained by ICP-MS after acid digestionwere in good agreement with those by GF-AAS (correlation coefficient = 0.983), but GF-AAS gave systematically higher values than ICP-MS. While a good agreement between two analytical methods after microwave digestion was also obtained (correlation coefficient = 0.950), bone lead concentrations from microwave were relatively higher than those from acid digestion. In conclusion, the use of the simple nitric acid digestion procedure at an ambient temperature coupled to ICP-MS seems to be efficient for the determination of lead in bone in consideration for both the convenience and validity.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable and accurate analytical method of digestion for the determination of lead in bone using concentrated nitric acid and microwave by ICP-MS and GF-AAS. Accuracy of the method here has been demonstrated by comparison of the results obtained with those of the National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1400 bone ash and 1486 bone meal.
제안 방법
4. Determination of lead by ICP-MS and GF-AAS Samples were analyzed using ICP-MS and GF-AAS.
The overall accuracy of the ICP-MS and GF-AAS measurements by means of digestion methods was evaluated by analysis of bone meal standard reference material (NIST SRM 1486), which underwent exactly the same sample preparation as the bone samples. We also analyzed bone ash standard reference material (NIST SRM 1400), which assured the accuracy of the ICP-MS and GF-AAS without digestion step.
대상 데이터
The tibia bone samples, amputated around the knee were obtained from the Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Seoul National University. They had some overlying tissue and had been preserved with formalin to avoid decomposition.
성능/효과
On the other hand, the microwave digestion method at both ICP-MS and GF-AAS overestimated lead concentration. Recovery by both analytical methods was more than 120% but there was no statistical significance between ICP-MS and GF-AAS (126.86% vs. 126.85%, p>0.05).
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.