[논문]임프란트 고정체와 지대주 직경의 차이가 응력분포에 미치는 영향

정종원; 이청희

임프란트 고정체와 지대주 직경의 차이가 응력분포에 미치는 영향
THE EFFECT OF THE DIFFERENCE OF THE IMPLANT FIXTURE AND ABUTMENT DIAMETER FOR STRESS DISTRIBUTION 원문보기

대한치과보철학회지 = The journal of Korean academy of prosthodontics, v.42 no.5, 2004년, pp.583 - 596

정종원 (경북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) , 이청희 (경북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Statement of problem : Stress concentration on the neck bone affects the bone resorption, and finally the implant survival. Purpose: In order to examine the stress distribution on the neck bone and prosthesis abutment for implants, decreasing abutment sizes were used. Material and methods : Axisymmetric models were used to obtain the data required. These models were composed of 4mm implants with 3.4mm and 4mm abutments, 5mm implants with 3.4mm and 5mm abutments and 6mm implants with 3.4mm and 6mm abutments. All abutments were designed to received a 10mm high by 10mm diameter gold crown. Functional element analysis was used to obtain these results using data that consisted of 50 N vertical and 45 degree inclination forces. Results : 1. Changing the diameter of the abutment on the implant affects the effect of the inclination forces more than the effect of the vortical forces. 2. Changing the diameter of the abutment on the implant affect the effect of the inclination forces more than the effect of the vertical forces. 3. Experimentation showed that the larger diameter implants provided a decreased neck bone stress, whereas a larger diameter abutment provided a decrease marginal abutment stress. 4. Experimentation showed that the neck bone and abutment received more stress from inclination forces than vertical forces, Conclusions: By decreasing the size of the abutment on the implant we were able to diminishneck bone stress.

주제어

참고문헌 (29)

Tuncelli B, Poyrazoglu E, Koyluoflu AM, Tezcan S. Comparison of load transfer by implant abutments of various diameters. Eur J of Prosthodont Res Den 1997; 5:79-83
Lee JW, Lee CH, Jo KH. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with load transfer characteristics of the implant/bone interface. J Korean Academy of Implant Dentistry 2003;22:48-56
Eric P Holmgren, Robert J Seckinger, Leslie M Kilgren. Evaluating parameters of osseointergated dental implant using finite element analysis a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantology 1998;24:80-88

상세보기
ES Jung. A finite element stress analysis of the bone around implant following cervical bone resorption. J Korean Academy of Implant Dentistry 2003;22(1):38-48
Chun HJ, Cheong et al. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2002; 29:565-574

상세보기
Zarb GA, Lekholm D. Patient selection and preparation. In Branemark PI., Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, Tissue-intergrated proshtheses. Chicago: Quintessence Pub C Inc 1985; 199-209
Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;67(6):633-640
DY Park. Stress analysis around implant system using an axiosymmetric modelling approach. 2002
Brunski JB; Puleo DA. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:15-46
Hoshaw, SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modelling and remodelling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-360
Lindquist, LW, RockIer B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue - integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:59-63

상세보기
LeGeros RZ, Craig RG. Strategies to affect bone remodelling. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:583-593

상세보기
Borchers L, Raeichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dental Res 1983;62:155-159

상세보기
Adell R. Lekholm D, RockIer B. A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416

상세보기
Han CH, Chun HJ, Jung SY et al. Studies of osseointegrated implant-models on stress distribution. J Korean Academy Protho 2000;38:526-542
Matsushita, Y., Kithoh, M., Mizuta, K et al. Two dimensional FEM analysis of hy droxyapatite implants: Diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:6-11

상세보기
Rieger MR, Adams WK. Kinzel GI. Finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(4):457-465

상세보기
Langer B, Langer L, Bimbenet OC, Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone availables fQf a loaded implant. J. Prosthet Dent 1993;2:183-189
Misch CE. Implant design consideration for the posterior regions of the mouth. Implant Dentistry 1999;8(4);376-385
Misch CEo Bone dentistry, A key derterminant for clinical success in contcmporory implant dentistry. St. Louis MO. Mosby yearbook. Inc. 1999;109-118
Branemark PI. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-intergrated proshtheses. Chicago, Quintessence Pub C. Inc. PP. 1985:214-215
Manz MC. Radiographic assessment of peri-implant vertical bone loss, DICRG interim report No 9, J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55(5):62-71
Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW, Nalluri P. Functional surface area: thread form and diameter optimization for implant body design. Compendium 1998;19:4-9
KM Chung, CH Chung, SM Jeong. Finite element stress analysis of implant prosthesis according to platform width of fixture. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2003;41(5):674-688
MR Rieger, K Fareed, WK Adams, RA Tanquist. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989:61(2):223-228
Renouard F, Arnoux JP, Sarment DP. Five-rum-diameter implants without a smooth surface collar: Report on 98 consecutive placements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:101-107
Gross M, Abramovich I. Wesis EI. Microleakage at the abutment-implant interface of osseointergrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:94-100
Kinni ME, Hokama SN, Caputo AA. Force transfer by osseointegration implants devices. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1987;1:11-14
Hassler CR, Rybicki EF, Cummings KD, Clark LC. Quanification of compressive stresses and it s effects on bone remodelling, Bull. hosp. Bone Joint Res 1977;38:90-3

저자의 다른 논문 :

원문 URL 링크

대한치과보철학회 : 저널
Korea Open Access Journals : 저널

*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.

ScienceON TREND 미세플라스틱

내보내기 메뉴

내보내기 구분

파일저장
인쇄
메일전송

구성항목

기본정보
상세정보

관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관

저장형식

Text(ASCII format)
Excel format
RefWorks Direct Export
RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley

메일정보

받는사람 (필수): @
보내는사람 (선택): @
제목
내용: KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스

안내

총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다.

다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000)

검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다.

데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요)

다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다.
파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오.

Text(ASCII format)
Excel format

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper

안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

연합인증