$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

수종Ceromer의 변연적합도와 파절강도에 관한 비교연구

A STUDY ON THE MARGINAL FIDELITY AND THE FRACTURE STRENGTH OF CEROMERS

Abstract

Statement of problem: The use of Ceromer is increasing in dentistry. But, the research of Ceromer has not been conducted much. Purpose : This study was to evaluate the marginal fidelity and internal adaptation according to marginal position. Materials and Methods: In this study 60 resin crowns were fabricated. The measurements of the marginal fidelity were carried out using stereomicroscope $SZ-40^{(R)}$ (Olympus, Japan) and the measurements of fracture strength were done using Instron $8871^{(R)}$ (Instron Co., U.S.A.) at a cross head speed of 1mm/min. All of the measurements were statistically analyzed by ANOVA test, multiple range test and Weibull analysis. Statistical significance was set in advance at the probability level of less than 0.05. All of the measurements were analyzed with Window $SPSS^{(R)}$ Version 10.0 soft ware for the personal computer. Results : 1. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, but difference between these two and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 2. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each maerial and with/without fiber group in the marginal fidelity 3. There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Tescera^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ but no statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 4 There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each material and with/without fiber group in the fracture strength. 5. When comparing the fracture surface, no fiber group showed the resin which were fractured at the labial surface and separated from the adhesion surface. In fiber group, the fractures took a place in resin compartments. Conclusion. The marginal fidelity and the fracture strength were clinically acceptable. From these results, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$ were superior than $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ in the marginal fidelity But, when applying these resin crowns in clinic, more careful consideration is needed and further study is recommended.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Land CH. A new system of restoring badly decayed teeth by means of an enamelled metallic coating. Independent Practitioner 1886:7:407 
  2. McLean JW. Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965:119:251-267 
  3. Rosentiel SF. Porter SS. Apparent fracture toughness of dental porcelain with a metal substructure. Dent Mater 1988;4: 1897-1990 
  4. Sadoun, M. All ceramic bridges with the slip casting technique. present ed at the 7th International Symposium on Ceramics. Paris, 1988. September 
  5. Russel Giordano II. Fiber reinforced composite resin systems. General Dentistry 2000:May/June:244-249 
  6. Kim SJ. Shin SW. Han JS. Suh KW. Marginal Fitness and marginal leakage of fiber-reinforced composite crowns depending upon luting cements. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000:38:618-630 
  7. Jeong CS. Kim KS. A study on the marginal fidelity and fracture strength of Artglass and Targis. Collected papers of Dankook University 1998 
  8. Ku CW, Park SW, Yang HS. Comparison of the fracture strengths of metal-ceramic crowns and three ceromer crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2002: 88: 170-175 
  9. Cho LR, Song HY, Koak JY, Heo SJ. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: Effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002: 88: 388-395 
  10. Lisa A. Knobloch, Ronald E. Kerby, Robert Seghi, Meade van Putten. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion labo- ratory-processed composite materials. Int J Prosthodont 1999:12:432-438 
  11. Suh BI. New concepts and technology for processing of indirect composites. Compendium sup 2003: 24 :40-42 
  12. J. Robert Holmes. William D. Sulik. Gene A. Holland. Stephen C. Bayne. Marginal fit of casable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992:67:594-599 
  13. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby: 1996. p56 
  14. Kern M. Schaller HG. Strub JR. Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation in FiFO. Int J Prosthodont 1993: 6:585-591 
  15. Lee HK, Cho IH. Study on the marginal fidelity and the fracture strength of AllCeramic crowns. Collected papers of Dankook University 2002 
  16. Joo YJ, Cho IH. On the marginal fidelity of All-Ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM method. Collected papers of Dankook University 2003 
  17. Shinohara N, Minesaki Y, Mukoyoshi N, Moriyama, Jimi T. The effect of the cementing material on the strength of the all ceramic crown. J Jpn Prosthodont 1989: 33:416 
  18. Shane N. White. Zhaokun Yu. Victor Kipnis. Effect of seating force on film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992:68:476-481 
  19. John A. Sorensen. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Presthet Dent 1990:64: 18-24 
  20. Ryu JH. Kim YC. Kang DW. Study on the marginal fidelity and the fracture strength of IPS-Empress. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000:38:606-617 
  21. Lim JH. Study on the marginal fidelity and the fracture strength of In-Coram crown according to luting cements. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998: 36: 888-898 
  22. Jorgensen KD. Factors affecting the film thickness of zinc phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scan 1960: 18:479-490 
  23. ADA specification No 8, Council on dental material and devices. J Am Dent Assoc 1978. p96 
  24. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay casting. J Prosthet Dent 1966: 16: 297-305 
  25. May KB, Russel MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision fit : the Procera All-Ceramic Crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998:80:394-404 
  26. Marc Loose, Martin Rosentritt, Alexander Leibrock. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Res Dent 1998:6:55-62 
  27. Michael Behr, M. Rosentritt, D. Latzel, T. Kreisler. Comparison of three of fiberreinforced composite molar crowns on their resistance and mar ginal adaptation. J Dent 2001:29: 187-196 
  28. T. Nakamura, T. Ohyama, A. Imanishi, S. lshigaki. Fracture resistance of pressable glass-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabilitation 2002:29:951-955 
  29. Lee SH, Lee YG, Lim BS, Kim CW. Change in the optical properties of laboratory resin composites after thermocycling. Dental Materials Jounal SNU. 2002:12:517 
  30. Derand T. Stress analysis of cemented or resin-bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1999:7:21-24 
  31. Carola Kolbeck, Martin Rosentritt, Michael Behr, Reinhold Lang, Gerhard Handel. In vitro examination of the fracture strength of 3 different fiber-reinforced composite and 1 all-ceramic posterior inlay fixed partial denture systems. J Prosthodont 2002: 11: 248-253 
  32. Robert W. Loney, M. Brent Moulding, Ron G. Ritsco. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. lnt J Prostho 1995:8:247-251 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. Lee, Jong-Hyuk 2009. "Dimensional Changes of Ceromer Crown by Water Absorption" 대한치과보철학회지 = The journal of Korean academy of prosthodontics, 47(2): 119~124 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :
  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일