복합복원기술 개발을 위한 설계안 : 중금속 오염토양을 위한 토양세척과 토양파쇄의 통합 사례 연구 Design Scheme to Develop Integrated Remediation Technology: Case Study of Integration of Soil Flushing and Pneumatic Fracturing for Metal Contaminated Soil원문보기
중금속으로 오염된 농경지 토양을 효과적으로 보권하기 위해서는 토양 매체내에서 반응과정을 거치는 중금속의 동태와 이동성에 따라 한 가지 이상의 복원기술이 선택되어야 한다. 오염토양 복원 시 중요한 토양의 물질적 수리적 요인은 투수성, 공극성, 토성과 토양조직, 오염물질의 형태와 농도, 오염물질의 동태와 이동특성이다. 따라서 중금속으로 오염된 농경지 토양에 적용할 수 있는 복합복원기술 개발 방법을 기존의 사용하고 있는 적용 가능한 화학적 기술과 물리적 기술을 중심으로 검토하여 보았다. 심층토내 중금속을 제거하는 화학적 기술로서 토양세척이 있으나 이러한 단일 기술로는 효과적 복원이 어렵다. 따라서 토양세척기술이 가지고 있는 단점을 보완하기 위한 물리적 기술로 토양파쇄 기술이 있다. 그러나 토양세척과 토양파쇄 기술은 혼용하여 오염토양에 적용할 지라도 오염물질제거율은 높은 이류 흐름 지역에서는 확산유동에 의해 비율제한적으로 된다. 그러므로 선택된 두 가지 기술을 현장에서 효과적으로 적용하기 위해서는 오염토양 복원 시 공정별로 각각의 기술이 가지는 장단점을 파악하기 위해서는 기존 현장에서 기술 적용 시 발견된 문제점과 요인들을 검토하여야 한다. 또한 복원의 효율을 예측하기 위해서는 오염물질의 역학적 탈착, 유동과 이동을 포함하는 예상수학모형을 통해 오염토양의 이질성과 복합 반응에 의한 실질 심층토내에서의 유동 경로 정확한 특성을 파악하여야 한다.
중금속으로 오염된 농경지 토양을 효과적으로 보권하기 위해서는 토양 매체내에서 반응과정을 거치는 중금속의 동태와 이동성에 따라 한 가지 이상의 복원기술이 선택되어야 한다. 오염토양 복원 시 중요한 토양의 물질적 수리적 요인은 투수성, 공극성, 토성과 토양조직, 오염물질의 형태와 농도, 오염물질의 동태와 이동특성이다. 따라서 중금속으로 오염된 농경지 토양에 적용할 수 있는 복합복원기술 개발 방법을 기존의 사용하고 있는 적용 가능한 화학적 기술과 물리적 기술을 중심으로 검토하여 보았다. 심층토내 중금속을 제거하는 화학적 기술로서 토양세척이 있으나 이러한 단일 기술로는 효과적 복원이 어렵다. 따라서 토양세척기술이 가지고 있는 단점을 보완하기 위한 물리적 기술로 토양파쇄 기술이 있다. 그러나 토양세척과 토양파쇄 기술은 혼용하여 오염토양에 적용할 지라도 오염물질제거율은 높은 이류 흐름 지역에서는 확산유동에 의해 비율제한적으로 된다. 그러므로 선택된 두 가지 기술을 현장에서 효과적으로 적용하기 위해서는 오염토양 복원 시 공정별로 각각의 기술이 가지는 장단점을 파악하기 위해서는 기존 현장에서 기술 적용 시 발견된 문제점과 요인들을 검토하여야 한다. 또한 복원의 효율을 예측하기 위해서는 오염물질의 역학적 탈착, 유동과 이동을 포함하는 예상수학모형을 통해 오염토양의 이질성과 복합 반응에 의한 실질 심층토내에서의 유동 경로 정확한 특성을 파악하여야 한다.
In remediation of the contaminated soil, it requires to select at least more than two remediation technologies depending on the fate and transport phenomena through complicated reactions in soil matrix. Therefore, methodologies related to develop the integrated remediation technology were reviewed f...
In remediation of the contaminated soil, it requires to select at least more than two remediation technologies depending on the fate and transport phenomena through complicated reactions in soil matrix. Therefore, methodologies related to develop the integrated remediation technology were reviewed for agricultural soils contaminated with heavy metals. Pneumatic fracturing is necessary to implement deficiency because soil washing is not effective to remove heavy metals in the subsurface soil. But it needs to evaluate the characteristics such as essential data and factors of designated technology in order to effectively apply them in the site. In the remediation site, the important soil physical and chemical factors to be considered are hydrology, porosity, soil texture and structure, types and concentrations of the contaminants, and fate and its transport properties. However, the integrated technology can be restrictive by advective flux in the area which remediation is highly effective although both soil washing and pneumatic fracturing were applied simultaneously in the site. Therefore, we need to understand flow pathways of the target contaminants in the subsurface soils, that includes kinetic desorption and flux, predictive simulation modeling, and complicated reaction in heterogenous soil.
In remediation of the contaminated soil, it requires to select at least more than two remediation technologies depending on the fate and transport phenomena through complicated reactions in soil matrix. Therefore, methodologies related to develop the integrated remediation technology were reviewed for agricultural soils contaminated with heavy metals. Pneumatic fracturing is necessary to implement deficiency because soil washing is not effective to remove heavy metals in the subsurface soil. But it needs to evaluate the characteristics such as essential data and factors of designated technology in order to effectively apply them in the site. In the remediation site, the important soil physical and chemical factors to be considered are hydrology, porosity, soil texture and structure, types and concentrations of the contaminants, and fate and its transport properties. However, the integrated technology can be restrictive by advective flux in the area which remediation is highly effective although both soil washing and pneumatic fracturing were applied simultaneously in the site. Therefore, we need to understand flow pathways of the target contaminants in the subsurface soils, that includes kinetic desorption and flux, predictive simulation modeling, and complicated reaction in heterogenous soil.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
The primary objectives of this review were to provide information about the intrinsic design scheme and relevant factors needed for developing the integrated remediation scheme which was focused on incorporation of pneumatic fracturing (hereafter PF) into in situ soil flushing (hereafter SF) for heavy metal contaminated soil, as of the effective and cost-saving physical-chemical remediation technologies.
Design of the remediation technology is conducted in parallel with the other continuing design process rather than in series about the various cleanup technologies, the design requirements, and procurement and planning needs. The tasks involved in this procedures are project planning and support, data acquisition, analytical support and data validation, data usability evaluation, treatability study and pilot testing, preliminary design, intermediate design, prefinal design, and post remedial design support. Generally to develop the new remediation technology, it requires the following procedures as shown in Fig.
And a pilot demonstration of pneumatic fracturing was sponsored by DOE at Tinker AFB in 1993 pneumatic fracturing increased the average monthly removal rate by 15 times. Therefore, the general concept is to use SF to displace and transport heavy metals from the soil into treatment zones where the heavy metals are removed from the pore water and soil particle surfaces by exchange and miscible displacement after fracturing is completed by PF. Briefly, it consists of the following components:
성능/효과
Successful fracturing of a geologic formation with a gas requires that two basic operational conditions be met (Hubbert and Willis, 1957; King, 1993). First, the gas that can not be dissolve in the soil subsurface must be injected at a flow rate that exceeds the ability of the formation to receive the air, i.e., the flow rate must be greater than the native permeability of the formation. Second, the gas must be injected at a pressure that equals or exceeds the in situ geostatic stresses at the depth of injection.
참고문헌 (24)
AATDF, 1997. Technology Practices Manual for Surfactants and Cosolvents, Technical Report, Document No. TR-97-2
Allen, J.P. and I.G. Torres. 1991. Physical Separation Techniques for Contaminated Sediment, in Recent Developments in Separation Science, N.N. Li, Ed., CRC Press, West Palm Beach, FL
Andreas V., K. Barmettler, and R Kretzschmar. 2003. Heavy Metal Release from Contaminated Soils : Comparison of Column Leaching and Batch Extraction Results. JEQ. 32:865-875
Bohler, J. B., H. Hotzl, and M. Nahold. 1990. Air injection and soil air extraction as a combined method for cleaning contaminated sites-observations from test sites in sediments and solid rocks, in Contaminated Soil, Arendt, F., Hinsevelt, M., and van der Brink, W. J., Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin
DOE. 1995. Development of an Integrated in-situ Remediation Technology, DOE Contract Number: DE-AR21-94MC31185, Monsanto Company
Gale, J. E. 1982. Assessing the Permeability Characteristics of Fractured Rock, Geological Society of America, Special Paper 189
EPA. 1995. In Situ Remediation Technology Status Report: Hydraulic and HPF, EPA/542/K-94/005
EPA. 1998. Guidance for scoping the remedial deign. Engineering Bulletin. EPA, OERR and ORD. Washington, DC. EPA-540/R95/025
EPA. 2004. Best Management Practices for Soil Treatment Technologies: Suggested Operational Guidelines to Prevent Crossmedia Transfer of Contaminants During Clean-UP Activities, EPA OSWER, EPA/530/R-97/007
Hubbert, M. K. and D. G. Willis. 1957. 'Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing,' Trans. AIME, Vol. 210, pp. 153-166
King, T. C. 1993. 'Mechanism of HPF,' M.S. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ
Lundegard, P. D. and G. Andersen. 1993. Numerical simulation of air sparging performance, Proc. Petroleum Hydrocarbons Organ Chem. Groundwater: Prevention, Detection, Restoration, Houston, TX
Manceau, A., B. Lanson, M.L. Schlegel, J.C. Harge, M. Musso, L.E. Berard, J.L. Hazemann, D. Chateigner, and G.M. Lambie. 2000. Quantitative Zn speciation in smelter-contaminated soils by EXAFS spectroscopy. Am. J. Sci. 300:289-343
McBride, M. B. 1994. Environmental chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press. New York
McBride, M.B. 1999. Chemisorption and precipitation reactions. p. B265 B302. In Sumner, M.E. (ed.) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Morin, G., J.D. Ostergren, F. Juillot, P. Ildefonse, G. Calas, and G.E. Brown, Jr. 1999. XAFS determination of the chemical form of lead in smelter-contaminated soils and mine tailings: Importance of adsorption processes. Am. Mineral. 84:420-434
Murdoch, L. C., G. Losonsky, P. Cluxton, B. Patterson, I. Klich, and B. Braswell. 1991. The feasibility of hydraulic fracturing of soil to improve remedial actions. Final report. EPA/600/2-91/012 (NTIS PB9l-181818)
Schuring, J. R., 1994. Pneumatic fracturing to remove soil contaminants, NJIT Res., 2, Spring
Sparks, D. L., L. W. Zelazny, and D. A. Martens. 1980. Kinetics of potassium desorption in soil using miscible displacement. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:1205-1208
Suthersan, S. S. 1999. 'IN SITU Air SPARGING' Remediation engineering: design concepts. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC
Testa, S. M. 1994. Geological Aspects of Hazardous Waste Management, CRC Press / Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla., 537p
Testa, S. M., and D. L. Winegardner. 2000. Restoration of Contaminated Aquifers, 2nd edition, CRC Press / Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla., 446 p
van Genuchten M. Th., and P. J. Wierenga. 1976. Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media: I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40:473-48
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.