최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국육수학회지 = Korean journal of limnology, v.40 no.1, 2007년, pp.130 - 142
김자현 (충남대학교 생명과학부) , 서진원 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원) , 나영언 (충남대학교 생물공학연구소) , 안광국 (충남대학교 생명과학부)
This study was to examine impacts of turbid water on fish community in the downstream of Yongdam Dam during the period from June to October 2006. For the research, we selected six sampling sites in the field: two sites were controls with no influences of turbid water from the dam and other remaining...
공동수. 2002. 생물학적 수질기준 설정 필요성 및 접근방안, 환경생물 20: 38-49
김범철, 김윤희. 2004. 아시아 몬순지역의 대형댐(소양호)에서의 인순환과 2차원모델의 적용, 육수지 37(2): 205-212
김익수. 1997. 한국동식물도감 동물편(담수어류). 교육부
김익수, 강종언. 1993. 원색한국어류도감. 아카데미서적
김익수, 박종영. 2002. 원색도감 한국의 민물고기. 교학사
박구성, 황순진, 김호섭, 공동수, 신재기. 2006. 하수처리수를 이용한 인공수로에서 사상성 부착조류의 성장에 영향을 미치는 요인들, 육수지 39(1): 100-109
박재충, 박정원, 신재기, 이희무. 2005. 인공호에서 몬순과 태풍강우에 의한 고탁수층의 이동과 소멸특성, 육수지 38(1): 105-117
배대열, 안광국. 2006. 생물학적 다변수 모델 적용 및 수화학분석에 의거한 갑천생태계 평가, 육수지 39(2): 198-208
신재기, 조경제. 1998. 대청천에서 부착조류의 1차 생산성, 육수지 31: 294-302
안광국, 김자현. 2005. 물리적 서식지평가기법 및 어류 다변수 평가모델에 의거한 대전천의 생태학적 건강도 진단, 육수지 83(3): 361-391
안광국, 김자현, 배대열, 이재연. 2006. 생태 지표종을 이용한 해부학적 건강성 평가지수(HAI) 적용을 위한 예비실험, 육수지 39(1): 62-72
안광국, 신인철. 2005. 산간 계류성 하천의 계절적 수질변동에 대한 몬순강우의 영향, 육수지 38(1): 54-62
안광국, 이재연. 2005. 유등천에서의 생태학적 건강도 평가 및 수질 양상, 육수지 38(3): 341-451
안광국, 정승현, 최신석. 2001. 생물보전지수(Index of Biological Integrity) 및 서식지평가지수(Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index)를 이용한 평창강의 수환경평가, 육수지 34: 153-165
안광국, 최지웅. 2006. 초강의 통합적 생태건강성 평가, 육수지 39(3): 320-330
우효섭. 2004. 국내하천사업의 진화와 전망-청계천 사업의 좌표, 한국수자원학회지 37(1): 41-46
환경부. 2004. 자연형 하천 정화사업 추진사례 보고서
환경부. 2005. 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구(I) 보고서
해양수산부. 2005. 내수면 잠재력 조사 및 발전 방안 연구 보고서
허우명, 김범철, 김윤희, 최광순. 1998. 소양호 유역에서 비점오염원의 홍수유출과 오염수괴의 호수내 이동, 육수지 31(1): 1-8
Adams, S.M., A.M. Brown and R.W. Goede. 1993. A quantitative health assessment index for rapid evaluation of fish condition in the field. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122: 63-73
Akan, A.O. and R.J. Houghtalen. 2003. Urban hydrology, hydraulics and stormwater quality. Hoboken (NJ)7 Wiley. p. 373
An, K.G. and D.S. Kim. 2003. Response oflake water quality to nutrient inputs from various streams and in-lake fishfarms. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 149(1-4): 27-49
An, K.G. and J.R. Jones. 2000. Temporal and spatial patterns in ionic salinity and suspended solids in a reservoir influenced by the Asian monsoon. Hydrobiologia 436: 179-189
Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C
Blazer, V.S. 2000. The necropsy-based fish health assessment. Information and technology report USGS/BRD/ITR 2000-0005. p. 18-22
Bloesch, J.P., P. Stadelman and H. Buhrer. 1977. Primary production and sedimentation in the euphotic zone of two Swiss lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22: 511-526
Didier, J., D. Kestemont and J.C. Micha. 1996. Indice-Biotique d'Integrite piscicole pour evaluer la qualite ecologique des ecosystemes aquatiques. la Paix, Namur, Belgium
Ganasan, V. and R.M. Hughes. 1998. Application of index of biological integrity (IBI) to fish assemblages of the rivers Khan and Kshipra (Madhya Pradesh), India. Freshwater Biology 40(2): 55-59
Goldman, C.R. 1978. The use of natural phytoplankton populations in bioassay. Mitt. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 21: 364-371
Gutierrez, M.A.R. 1994. Utilizacion de la ictiofauna como indicadora de la integridad biotica de los rios guachey Guanare, Estado Portuguesa, Venezuela., M.S. thesis, Universidad Nacional Experimental de los Llanos
Harris, J.H. 1995. The use offish in ecological assessments. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 65-80
Hellawell, J.M. 1986. Biological Indicator of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers LTD. p. 78-79
Hocutt, C.H., P.N. Johnson, C. Hay and B.J. VanZyl. 1994. Biological basis of water quality assessment: the Kavango River, Namibia. Reviews Hydrobiologie Tropical 27: 361-384
Horton, R.E. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin 56: 275-370
Horne, A.J. and C.R. Goldman. 1994. Limnology, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc. p. 576
Hugueny, B, S. Camara, B. Samoura and M. Magassouba. 1996. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on communities in a west african river. Hydrobiologia 331: 71-78
Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fishieries 6: 21-27
Kim, B., J.H. Park, G. Hwang and K. Choi. 1997. Eutrophication of Large Freshwater Ecosystem in Korea. Korean. J. Limnol. 30: 512-517
Koizumi, N. and Y. Matsumiya. 1997. Assessment of stream fish habitat based on Index of Biotic Integrity. Bull. Japan. Soc. Oceanogr. 61: 144-156
Kotai, J., T. Krogh and O.M. Skullberg. 1978. The fertility of some Norwegian inland waters assayed by algal cultures. Mitt. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 21: 413-436
Lyons, J.S., P.A. Navarro-Perez, E. Cochran, C. Santana, and M. Guzman-Arroyo. 1995. Index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages for the conservation of streams and rivers in west-central Mexico. Conservation Biology 9: 569-584
Macan, T.T. 1963. Freshwater Ecology. Longmans, London, England, UK & John Wiley, New York, USA. p. 338
Miller, W.E., T.E. Maloney and J.C. Greene. 1974. Algal productivity in 49 lake waters as determined by algal assays. Wat. Res. 8: 667-679
Nelson, J.S. 1994. Fishes of the world (3th ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York
Oberdorff, T. and R.M. Hughes. 1992. Modification of an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine Basin, France. Hydrobiologia 228: 117-130
OECD. 1982. Eutrophication of Waters: Monitoring, Assessment and Control. OECD, Paris
Ohio EPA. 1989. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Vol. III, Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory method for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities. U.S.A
Plafkin, J.L., M.T. Barbour, K.D. Porter, S.K Gross and R.M. Hughes. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrate and fish. EPA/444/4-89-001. Office of water regulations and standards. US EPA. Washington. DC, USA
Shin, J.Y., K.G. An and S.S. Park. 2004. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus using dominant riparian plants in a hydroponic culture system. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 39(3): 821-834
Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. American Geophysical Union Transactions 38: 913-920
Stroud, R.H. and R.G. Martin. 1973. Influence of reservoir discharge location on the water quality, biology, and sport fisheries of reservoirs and tail waters. p. 540-548 in Ackerman, W.C., G.F. White and E.B. Worthington eds: Man-made lakes: Their problems and environmental effects. Geophys. Mono. 17. Am. Geophys. Union, Wasington, DC
Thomas, D.F. and G.N. David. 1983. Characteristics of epiphyte communities on natural and artificial submersed lotic plants: Substrate effects. Arch. Hydrobiol. 3: 293-301
U.S. EPA. 1993. Fish field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters. EPA 600-R-92-11l. Environmental Monitoring systems Laboratory-cincinnati office of Modeling, Monitoring systems, and quality assurance Office of Research Development, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, USA
U.S. EPA. 2002. Summary of biological assessment programs and biocriteria development for states, tribes, territories, and interstate commissions: streams and wadable rivers. EPA-822-R-02-048. U.S. EPA, USA
Vanous, R.D., P.E. Larson and C.C. Hach. 1982. The theory and measurement of turbidity and residue. In: Minear RA, Keith LHWater analysis. New York Academic Press. p. 163-234
Wiedenfeld, R.C. 1980. The limnology of Canyon Reservoir during years of contrasting flows, M.S. Thesis, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos, TX. p. 58
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.