$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we analyzed and compared the anatomical position of the mandibular canal in normal occlusion and mandibular prognathism patients. Patients and Methods: Computed tomography image from 58 patients were divided into normal occlusion group and mandibular prognathism group, and each measurement were taken in the each measuring points(2nd premolar, 1st molar, 2nd molar, 3rd molar, ramus). Measurements were statistically analyzed by student's t-test. Results: BC (Thickness of the buccal cortex) value was 2.3~2.7 mm, CB (Distance from the canal to the lingual aspect of the buccal cortex) value was 1.3~4.3 mm, MC (Diameter of the canal) value was 3.2~3.8 mm, LI (Distance from the canal to the lingual aspect of the lingual cortex) value was 2.0~3.7 mm, TM (Thickness of the total mandible) value was 9.5~12.9 mm and CM (Distance from the canal to the inferior border of the mandible) value was 6.9~17.5 mm. Conclusion: In the comparison between two groups, there was statistically significant difference in CB value of 2nd, 3rd molar between normal occlusion and mandibular prognathism, and other value in the rest of the measuring points didn't show statistically significant difference.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Wofford DT, Miller RI : Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral maxillofac Surg 45 : 15, 1987 
  2. Jung YH, Nah KS, Cho BH : The location of the mandibular canal in prognathic patients compared to subjects with normal occlusion. Kor J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 37 : 217, 2007 
  3. Trauner R, Obwegeser H : The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10 : 677, 1957 
  4. Dal Pont G : Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 19 : 42, 1961 
  5. Epker BN : Modification in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg 35 : 157, 1977 
  6. Nishioka GJ, Zysset MK, van Sickels JE : Neurosensory disturbance with rigid fixation of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45 : 20, 1987 
  7. Haug RH : The effects of screw number and length on two methods of tension band plating. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51 : 159, 1993 
  8. Yu IH, Wong YK : Evaluation of mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed tomography scan images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37 : 521, 2008 
  9. Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R et al : Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 6 : 14, 1978 
  10. Van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C et al : The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism : A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 272, 1990 
  11. Hallikainen D, Iizuka T, Lindqvist C : Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 : 1269, 1992 
  12. Levine MH, Goddard AL, Dodson TB : Inferior alveolar nerve canal position: A clinical and radiographic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65 : 470, 2007 
  13. Koranyi E, Bowman CE, Knecht CD et al : Holding power of orthopedic screws in bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 72 : 283, 1970 
  14. Rajchel J, Ellis III E, Fonseca RJ : The anatomical location of the mandibular canal: its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1 : 37, 1986 
  15. Robert RC, Bacchetti P, Pogrel MA : Frequency of trigeminal nerve injuries following third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 732, 2005 
  16. Hunsuck EE : A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 26 : 250, 1968 
  17. Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B : Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1 : 79, 1973 
  18. Kim MK : Clinical anatomy of the head and neck, 3rd ed. Seoul, Med. & Dent. Publication Co., 1999, p62 
  19. Kim HJ, Lee HY, Chung IH et al : Mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy in Koreans. Yonsei med J 38 : 19, 1997 
  20. Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L : Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36 : 425, 1998 
  21. Gim HH, Cho BO : The anatomical location of the mandibular canal by computed tomogram. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Recon Surg 14 : 135, 1992 
  22. Shin HS, Hwang SJ : Study on the relationship of the inferior alveolar nerve position between buccal and lingual side using CT and orthopantomogram. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 28 : 1, 2002 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

  • 한국학술정보 : 저널
  • 대한악안면성형재건외과학회 : 저널

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일