$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Internal Consistency and Concurrent Validity of Korean Language Version of WHODAS 2.0: 12 Item-Self Administered 원문보기

대한물리치료학회지 = The journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy, v.23 no.6, 2011년, pp.23 - 29  

Lee, Hae-Jung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical and Life Science, Silla University) ,  Kim, Da-Jeong (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical and Life Science, Silla University)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Purpose: The aim of this study was to validate the Korean version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (KWHODAS 2.0) in 12 item-self administered version (12-self). Methods: The KWHODAS 2.0 and Korean Functional Rating index (KFRI) were tested for internal consistency, cei...

주제어

#WHODAS 2   #0   #Functional Rating Index   #Validity   #Low back pain   #Neck pain  

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • The aim of the study was to test the psychometric properties of the Korean version of WHODAS 2.0: 12-self version in patients with spinal pain.
  • 24,25,26 Validation of translated versions for existing questionnaires is able for both clinicians and researchers to share the clinical outcomes of interventions, and to increase the statistical power of clinical studies. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the disability from patients with low back pain and/or neck pain using both the instruments. The objectives of this study were: (1) to examine the internal consistency of the KWHODAS 2.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Thayer R, Measurement of activation through self-report. Psychol Rep. 1967;20(2):663-678. 

  2. Korean National Statistical Office. Korean Statistical Information System. 2010. 

  3. Fordyce W. Back pain in the workplace: Management of disability in nonspecific conditions: a report of the task force pain in the workplace of the international association for the study of pain. Seattle, IASP-Press, 1995:1-71. 

  4. Cote P, Cassidy J, Carroll L. The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey: The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. 1998;23(15):1689-1698. 

  5. Picavet H, Schpouten J. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequence and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain. 2008;33(4):s39-s51. 

  6. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll L et al. The burden and determine of neck pain in the general population: results of the bone and joint decade 2000-2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine. 2008;33(4):473-477. 

  7. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. Spine. 1995;20(4):437-477. 

  8. Moya F, Grau M, Riesco N et al. Chronic low back pain: multispecialty assessment of 100 patients. Aten Primaria. 2000;26(4):239-244. 

  9. Vernon H, Mior s. The Neck Disability Index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991; 14(7):409-415. 

  10. Wheeler A, Gookasian P, Baird A et al. Development of the neck pain and disability scale. Item analysis, face, and criterionrelated validity. Spine. 1999;24(13):1290. 

  11. Jordan A, Manniche C, Mosdal C et al. The Copenhagen neck functional disability scale: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21(8):520-527. 

  12. BenDebba M, Heller J, Ducker T et al. Cervical spine outcomes questionnaires: Its development and psychometric properties. Spine. 2002;27(19):2116-2123. 

    상세보기

  13. Roland M, Morris R A study of the natural history of low back pain. part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measures of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141-144. 

  14. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davier J et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271-273. 

    상세보기

  15. Kopec J, Esdaile J. Abrahamowiez M. et al. The Quebec back pain disability scale: measurement properties. Spine. 1995;20(3):341-352. 

  16. Feise R, Menke J. Functional Rating Index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal condition. Spine, 2001;26(1):78-86. 

    상세보기

  17. Kim D, Lee S, Lee H et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine. 2005;30(5):E123-127. 

  18. Lee H, Nicholson L, Adams R, Maher C et al. Development and psychometric testing of Korean language versions of 4 neck pain and disability questionnaires. Spine. 2006;31(16): 1841-1845. 

    상세보기

  19. Shin S, Choi. JEffects of specific exercise on chronic neck pain in elderly women. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(3):1-8. 

  20. Lee M, Song J, Kim J. The effects of neck exercise on neck and shoulder posture and pain in high school students. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2011;23(1):29-35. 

  21. Park S, Kim C, Lee D et al. The short term effects of the decompression ( $KNX 7000^{(r)}$ ) and traction device on pain with chronic low back pain with or without radicular pain. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2011;23(5):29-34. 

  22. Ustun T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S et al. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). World Health Organization. 2009. 

  23. Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun T et al. The definition of disability: what is in a name? Lancet. 2008;368(9543): 1219-1221. 

  24. Chwastiak L, Korf M. Disability in depression and back pain: Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(6):507-514. 

    상세보기

  25. Noonan V, Kopec J, Noreau L et al. Comparing the validity of five participation instruments in persons with spinal condition. J Rehabili. 2011;42:724-734. 

  26. Noonan V, Kopec J, Noreau L et al. Comparing the reliability of five participation instruments in persons with spinal condition. J Rehabili. 2010;42(8):735-743. 

  27. McHorney C, Tarlov A. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status survey adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293-307. 

    상세보기

  28. Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M et al. Quality criteria are proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. 

    상세보기

  29. Baron M, Schieir O, Hudson M et al. The clinimetric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in early inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(3):382-390. 

  30. Bayar B, Bayar K, Yakut E et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Rating Index in older people with low back pain: preliminary report. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(1):49-52. 

  31. Childs J, Piva S. Psychometric properties of the functional rating index in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(10):1008-1012. 

  32. Ustun T, Chatterji S, Konstanjsek N et al. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11);815-823. 

    상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로