This experiment was conducted as a part of Asia collaborative study on purpose of verifying the difference between CM6 and CM7 including 3R4F for reference. It carried out using various analytical categories for example, main stream, sidestream and Av. smoke. Additional analysis such as physical pro...
This experiment was conducted as a part of Asia collaborative study on purpose of verifying the difference between CM6 and CM7 including 3R4F for reference. It carried out using various analytical categories for example, main stream, sidestream and Av. smoke. Additional analysis such as physical properties, blending ratio, combustibility and general leaf component analysis also implemented in order to investigate the difference. We complied with ISO standard and CORESTA recommended method during analytical operating procedures. In this study, we described that comparative analytical result for CM6 and CM7 known as reference or monitoring cigarettes including 3R4F for reference. All sample cigarettes were conditioned at $22^{\circ}C$, 60% relative humidity for 48 hours. Av. Smoke, MS and SS smoke analysis were performed over five times with two smoking condition, ISO and Health Canada with the exception of Av. smoke analysis. We complied with ISO standard method during analytical operating procedures. And, we conducted additional analysis, such as physical properties, blending ratio, combustibility and leaf component analysis also in order to investigate the difference. In conclusion, we found out some differences between CORESTA monitoring cigarette No. 6 and No 7. The smoke components such as total particulate matters, NFDPM, nicotine and carbon monoxide contents of CM7 were a little lower than CM6. And, these phenomena were the same as not only main stream smoke but also side stream smoke and Av. smoke. This tendency was consistent with ISO and Health Canada smoking condition. Besides, leaf constituents' color of CM7 was darker than CM6. In case of combustibility, it showed short combustion time approximately 30 seconds.
This experiment was conducted as a part of Asia collaborative study on purpose of verifying the difference between CM6 and CM7 including 3R4F for reference. It carried out using various analytical categories for example, main stream, sidestream and Av. smoke. Additional analysis such as physical properties, blending ratio, combustibility and general leaf component analysis also implemented in order to investigate the difference. We complied with ISO standard and CORESTA recommended method during analytical operating procedures. In this study, we described that comparative analytical result for CM6 and CM7 known as reference or monitoring cigarettes including 3R4F for reference. All sample cigarettes were conditioned at $22^{\circ}C$, 60% relative humidity for 48 hours. Av. Smoke, MS and SS smoke analysis were performed over five times with two smoking condition, ISO and Health Canada with the exception of Av. smoke analysis. We complied with ISO standard method during analytical operating procedures. And, we conducted additional analysis, such as physical properties, blending ratio, combustibility and leaf component analysis also in order to investigate the difference. In conclusion, we found out some differences between CORESTA monitoring cigarette No. 6 and No 7. The smoke components such as total particulate matters, NFDPM, nicotine and carbon monoxide contents of CM7 were a little lower than CM6. And, these phenomena were the same as not only main stream smoke but also side stream smoke and Av. smoke. This tendency was consistent with ISO and Health Canada smoking condition. Besides, leaf constituents' color of CM7 was darker than CM6. In case of combustibility, it showed short combustion time approximately 30 seconds.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
6 and No 7. This experiment was conducted as a part of Asia collaborative study on purpose of verifying the difference between CM6 and CM7 including 3R4F for reference. It carried out using various analytical categories for example, main stream, sidestream and Av.
제안 방법
Additional analysis such as physical properties, blending ratio, combustibility and general leaf component analysis also implemented in order to investigate the difference. Av.
All sample cigarettes were selected randomly and were conditioned at twenty-two plus minus one degrees Celsius, sixty plus minus two percent relative humidity for forty eight hours in accordance with ISO and CORESTA recommended method. And then, smoke analyses were carried out. Atmospheric conditions and sample regime specification were showed in table 1.
참고문헌 (10)
CORESTA Recommended Method No.21 (1991) Atmosphere for Conditioning and Testing Tobacco and Tobacco Products
CORESTA Recommended Method No.54 (2002) Determination of nicotine and NFDPM in sidestream smoke using a fishtail chimney and a routine analytical / linear smoking machine
CORESTA Recommended Method No.55 (2002) Determination of carbon monoxide in the vapor phase of cigarette sidestream smoke using a fishtail chimney and a routine analytical / linear smoking machine
Health Canada Method T-115 paragraph 16.1 (1999) Ventilation zone blocking, puffing parameters and number of test pieces smoked.
ISO 10315 (2000) Cigarettes_determination of nicotine in smoke condensates_Gas chromatographic method
ISO 10362-1 (1999) Cigarettes_determination of water in smoke condensates_Part 1: Gas chromatographic method
ISO 3308 (2000) Routine analytical cigarette - smoking machine - definitions and standard conditions
ISO 3402 (1999) Tobacco and tobacco products - atmosphere for conditioning and testing
ISO 4387 (2000) Cigarettes_determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine
ISO 8454 (2007) Cigarettes_determination of carbon monoxide in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke_NDIR method
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.