참고문헌 (41)

1. Bae, J.T. and Bong, S.H., Development of a performance index in private company R&D activity. Journal of Technology Innovation, 1998, Vol. 12, p 45-69. 

2. Banker, R.D., Chanes, A., and Cooper, W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, p 1078-1092. 

   상세보기

3. Berchicci, L., Towards an open R&D system : Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 2012, Vol. 42, p 117-127. 

4. Bitman, W.R. and Sarif, N., A Conceptual Framework for Ranking R&D Projects. Engineering Management, 2008, Vol. 55, p 267-278. 

5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, Vol. 3, p 429-444. 

6. Chesbrough, H.W., Open Innovation : the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Massachusetts, USA : Harvard Business school press; 2006. 

7. Cho, K.T., Cho, Y.K., and Kang, H.S., Analytic Hierarchy Decision Making of Proceeding Leaders, Seoul, Korea : Donghyun, 2003, p 9-12. 

8. Cho, Y.G. and Cho, K.T., Development of an evaluation model in public R&D programmes-conceptual approach. The korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 2005, p 1045-1051. 

9. Choi, J.W., A study on the improvement of management outcomes in the start-up companies using AHP and DEA-Focusing on the tenant companies of business incubator center-. [dissertation]. [Seoul, Korea] : Ky. 

10. Choi, T.G., Strategic Design of the Government R&D Management System based on the Analysis of Relationship between R&D Program Types and their Outputs. [dissertation]. [Seoul, Korea] : Konkuk University; 2000. 

11. Ho, W., Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, Vol. 186, p 211-228. 

    상세보기

12. Hsu, P.M. and Hsueh, C.C., Measuring realtive efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects : A three- stage approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2009, Vol. 32, p 178-186. 

    상세보기

13. Jang, H.D. and Lee, J.H., An efficient selection of promising technology using DEA and AHP. Korean Corporation Management Review, 2011, Vol. 6, p 67-85. 

14. Jyoti, Banwet D.K. and Deshmukh, S.G., Evaluating performance of national R&D organizations using integrated DEA-AHP technique. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2008, Vol. 57, p 370-386. 

    상세보기

15. Kim, B.W. and Oh, H.S., An effective R&D performance measurement system : survey of Korean R&D researchers. Omega, 2002, Vol. 30, p 19-31. 

    상세보기

16. Kim, H.B., Yoon, J.H., Kim, J.S., and Kim, K.S., A Performance Indicator Roadmap Framework for evaluating Government R&D Programs. Proceeding of The Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers Spring Conference, 2009, p 1-9. 

17. Kim, M.S. and Jeong, H.J., Countstratgy Post catch-up in Mobile Phone industry. Korea Information Society Development Institute, 2010, Vol. 22, p 1-16. 

18. Kim, M.S., Internet shopping mall evaluation by AHP/ DEA. [dissertation] [Seoul, Korea] : Korea University, 2001. 

19. Kim, S.H., Jeong, B.H., and Kim, J.K., Analysis and Application of Decision making. 8th ed. Seoul, Korea : Youngchimunwhasa, 2009, p 379-401. 

20. Kim, Y.G., A Direction of Industrial Technology Policy for Open Innovation., Issue paper 2011-11. Seoul, Korea : KIAT, 2011. 

21. Lee, D.J., Bae, S.S., and Kang, J.S., Development of R&D project selection model and web-based R&D project selection system using hybrid DEA/AHP model. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2006, Vol. 32. 

22. Lee, J.J. and Lee, K.C. The Role of Government and The Strategy of Post Catch-up Science and Technology. Proceedings of Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference, 2010, p 223-239. 

23. Lee, K.W., Kim, H.B., and Jang, I.H., Implication and Analysis of Application system and management of Pubic R&D Performance. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning, 2012, Vol. 2, p 3-7. 

24. Lin, M.I., Lee, Y.D., and Ho, T.N., Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, Vol. 209, p 129-140. 

    상세보기

25. Liu, J.S. and Lu, W.-M., DEA and ranking with the network-based approach : a case of R&D performance. Omega, 2010, Vol. 38, p 453-464. 

    상세보기

26. Management Manual of R&D Performance in Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. Seoul, Korea : Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, National Research Foundation of Korea : 2009, p 50-51. 

27. Meng, W., Zhang, D., Qi, L., and Liu, W., Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation. Omega, 2008, Vol. 36, p 950-957. 

    상세보기

28. Park, S.J., Kim, K.H., and Jeong, S.K., The Study on the Analysis of Efficiency of Governmental R&D Programs Regarding to the S&T Outcomes. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2010, Vol. 14, p 205-222. 

29. Park, S.M., Khoe, K.I., and Sul, W.S., A Study on Performance Evaluation of Government-Funded R&D Projects with Composite Scores : Focussing on 'Supporting Project on Application Technology Development. Korean Journal. 

30. Park, S.M., Analysis of Congruence Between DEA Efficiency Scores and Normalization Indices of R&D Projects, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 2011, Vol. 24, p 1999-2014. 

31. Park, S.M., Two-staged DEA/AR-I Performance Evaluation Model for R&D Projects Efficiency Correlation Analysis and Programs Positioning Investigation. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 2010, Vol. 23, p 3285. 

32. Rhim, H.S., Yoo, S.C., and Kim, Y.S., A DEA/AHP hybrid model for evaluation and selection of R&D projects. The korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 1999, Vol. 24, p 1-12. 

33. Saaty, T.L., How to Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, Vol. 48, p 9-26. 

    상세보기

34. Shang, J. and Sueyoshi, T., A Unified Framework for the Selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, Vol. 85, p 297-315. 

    상세보기

35. Sohn, S.Y., Yong, G.J., and Hong, K.H., Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2007, Vol. 30, p 10-20. 

    상세보기

36. Wang, E.C. and Huang, W., Relative efficiency of R&D activities : A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36, p 260-273. 

    상세보기

37. Wang, Y.M., Liu, J., and Elhag, T.M.S., An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2009, Vol. 54, p 513-525. 

38. Yang, T. and Kuo, C., A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, Vol. 147, p 128-136. 

    상세보기

39. Yang, W.M., A study on the selection methodology of R&D projects using DEA/AHP with ordinal factors. [Master's thesis]. [Seoul, Korea] : Kyung Hee University, 2003. 

40. Yim, H., 2010 Technology Level Evaluation Report -95 Focued Science Technology-. 2011-031. Seoul, Korea : KISTEP, 2011. 

41. Yun, J.H., Kwon, O.J., Park, J.S., and Jeong, E.S., A Study on the Development and Adaption of Open Innovation Analysis Model. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2010, Vol. 13, p 99-123. 

    원문보기 상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

황승준 (26)